- From: Christopher R. Maden <crism@maden.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 17:41:24 -0500
- To: public-publ-wg@w3.org
On 07/24/2017 12:17 PM, Johnson, Rick wrote: > In response to the word “MAY” in the definition of WP, I’m trying to > understand the use cases for a W3C specification for any WP that does > not present using OWP. I can put together a publication about which no one cares, so it never gets presented. If we said MUST be rendered, then my publication isn't conforming — until an OWP system visits it. We might instead say MUST be presentable using OWP tech, but I’m OK with the current language. +1 ~Chris -- Christopher R. Maden Visiting Research Programmer for Scholarly Communication and Publishing Illinois Open Publishing Network / Publishing Without Walls University Library, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign <URL: http://www.library.illinois.edu/scp/ >
Received on Monday, 24 July 2017 22:41:50 UTC