Re: conformance and organization

I have a slight preference to hold all conformance issues and terms at one place. There is problem in creating subsections to the 'standard' conformance heading, and then adding a subsection for terminologies that are relevant for a specific spec only. See, for example, the way it was done in the Annotation spec[1].

But it is only a preference, nothing more.

Ivan

[1] https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/#conformance <https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/#conformance>



> On 2 Aug 2017, at 15:44, Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com <mailto:matt.garrish@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> And a couple of additional notes on some shuffling and starter setup I've done:
>  
> ·       The "conformance" heading is already reserved for explaining normative/informative sections and RFC 2119 keywords. I've moved that section under the introduction along with the terminology.
> ·       Following a pattern I found in other W3C specs, I've renamed the WP/user agent conformance section to "Conformance Classes".[1] There are a few placeholder-type requirements there for now, but I expect these will change as we get more of the document written.
>  
> As always, comments welcome.
>  
> [1] https://w3c.github.io/wpub/#conformance-classes <https://w3c.github.io/wpub/#conformance-classes>
>  
> Matt


----
Ivan Herman, W3C 
Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ <http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/>
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 <http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704>

Received on Wednesday, 2 August 2017 13:50:28 UTC