- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 15:50:20 +0200
- To: Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <700C803D-3315-4B0A-B961-935C87B0D274@w3.org>
I have a slight preference to hold all conformance issues and terms at one place. There is problem in creating subsections to the 'standard' conformance heading, and then adding a subsection for terminologies that are relevant for a specific spec only. See, for example, the way it was done in the Annotation spec[1]. But it is only a preference, nothing more. Ivan [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/#conformance <https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/#conformance> > On 2 Aug 2017, at 15:44, Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com <mailto:matt.garrish@gmail.com>> wrote: > > And a couple of additional notes on some shuffling and starter setup I've done: > > · The "conformance" heading is already reserved for explaining normative/informative sections and RFC 2119 keywords. I've moved that section under the introduction along with the terminology. > · Following a pattern I found in other W3C specs, I've renamed the WP/user agent conformance section to "Conformance Classes".[1] There are a few placeholder-type requirements there for now, but I expect these will change as we get more of the document written. > > As always, comments welcome. > > [1] https://w3c.github.io/wpub/#conformance-classes <https://w3c.github.io/wpub/#conformance-classes> > > Matt ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Publishing@W3C Technical Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ <http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/> mobile: +31-641044153 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 <http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704>
Received on Wednesday, 2 August 2017 13:50:28 UTC