public-prov-wg@w3.org from March 2013 by date

Saturday, 30 March 2013

Re: Internal Review Prov Dictionary Tom De Nies

Friday, 29 March 2013

Prov-DC ready for review Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-AQ blog post Paul Groth
RE: Internal Review Prov Dictionary Miles, Simon
Re: FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592) Khalid Belhajjame
Re: FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592) Paul Groth
Primer staged ready for review Miles, Simon
Re: dublin core to prov blog post up Daniel Garijo
dublin core to prov blog post up Paul Groth
Internal Review Prov Dictionary Sam Coppens Ugent

Thursday, 28 March 2013

Re: PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] Hua, Hook (388C)
Re: PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] Hua, Hook (388C)
Re: PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] Hua, Hook (388C)
Re: Changes to PROV-Dictionary XML schema Stephan Zednik
Re: Changes to PROV-Dictionary XML schema Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-ISSUE-643 (TomDN): Include additional constraint hadMember implies hadDictionaryMember with unknown key [PROV-DICTIONARY] Tom De Nies
Re: Changes to PROV-N grammar of PROV-Dictionary Luc Moreau
Changes to PROV-N grammar of PROV-Dictionary Tom De Nies
Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] Tom De Nies
Changes to PROV-Dictionary XML schema Tom De Nies
Re: PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] Luc Moreau
Minutes of 28 March 2013 Provenance Working Teleconference Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] Stephan Zednik
PROV-AQ blog post Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: PROV-ISSUE-640 (TomDN): Namespace and prefix in PROV Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY] Tom De Nies
Re: prov-links ready for review Graham Klyne
Re: prov-links ready for review Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-645 (TomDN): Should we add a new constraint on EmptyCollection and Dictionary? [PROV-DICTIONARY] Tom De Nies
Re: PROV-ISSUE-647 (TomDN): Make prov:pariValue a subproperty of prov:entity? [PROV-DICTIONARY] Tom De Nies
Re: PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-ISSUE-641 (TomDN): Should qualifiedInsertion/Removal imply qualifiedDerivation? [PROV-DICTIONARY] Tom De Nies
Re: PROV-ISSUE-638 (TomDN): Notation of set of key-value pairs in contraints of PROV Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY] Tom De Nies
Re: PROV-ISSUE-639 (TomDN): Notation of hadDictionaryMember [PROV-DICTIONARY] Tom De Nies
Re: PROV-ISSUE-638 (TomDN): Notation of set of key-value pairs in contraints of PROV Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY] Tom De Nies
prov-links ready for review Luc Moreau
new sotd paragraph and provbib.js Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] Hua, Hook (388C)

Wednesday, 27 March 2013

Re: Requesting reviews of Provenance Access and Query document. Graham Klyne
FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592) Miles, Simon
Re: Requesting reviews of Provenance Access and Query document. Graham Klyne
Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda March 27, 2013 Daniel Garijo
prov-wg Telcon Agenda March 27, 2013 Paul Groth

Tuesday, 26 March 2013

Re: [PROV-AQ] Editors' working copy updated Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-638 (TomDN): Notation of set of key-value pairs in contraints of PROV Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY] James Cheney
PROV-ISSUE-655 (overview-ducharme): Various comments on Overview from Bob DuCharme [PROV-OVERVIEW] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-654 (primer-ducharme): Various clarifications and comments (Bob DuCharme) [Primer] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

Monday, 25 March 2013

[PROV-AQ] Editors' working copy updated Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-647 (TomDN): Make prov:pariValue a subproperty of prov:entity? [PROV-DICTIONARY] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-647 (TomDN): Make prov:pariValue a subproperty of prov:entity? [PROV-DICTIONARY] Tom De Nies
PROV-ISSUE-653: typo in example [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-647 (TomDN): Make prov:pariValue a subproperty of prov:entity? [PROV-DICTIONARY] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-647 (TomDN): Make prov:pariValue a subproperty of prov:entity? [PROV-DICTIONARY] Tom De Nies
Re: PROV-ISSUE-647 (TomDN): Make prov:pariValue a subproperty of prov:entity? [PROV-DICTIONARY] Timothy Lebo
Re: ACTION-122 is complete Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: PROV-ISSUE-640 (TomDN): Namespace and prefix in PROV Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY] Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: PROV-ISSUE-643 (TomDN): Include additional constraint hadMember implies hadDictionaryMember with unknown key [PROV-DICTIONARY] Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: PROV-ISSUE-647 (TomDN): Make prov:pariValue a subproperty of prov:entity? [PROV-DICTIONARY] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-643 (TomDN): Include additional constraint hadMember implies hadDictionaryMember with unknown key [PROV-DICTIONARY] Tom De Nies
Re: PROV-ISSUE-643 (TomDN): Include additional constraint hadMember implies hadDictionaryMember with unknown key [PROV-DICTIONARY] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-641 (TomDN): Should qualifiedInsertion/Removal imply qualifiedDerivation? [PROV-DICTIONARY] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-639 (TomDN): Notation of hadDictionaryMember [PROV-DICTIONARY] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] Luc Moreau

Friday, 22 March 2013

Thursday, 21 March 2013

FAQ: "Can I infer Derivation from Usage and Generation?" Curt Tilmes
minutes of today's provenance teleconference Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] Stephan Zednik
today's call: scribe needed, please Luc Moreau
Re: provenance working group teleconference agenda: March 21, 2013 Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] Luc Moreau
Re: provenance working group teleconference agenda: March 21, 2013 Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] Hua, Hook (388C)
ACTION-122 is complete Luc Moreau
Re: provenance working group teleconference agenda: March 21, 2013 James Cheney
blog post on our last release of prov Paul Groth

Wednesday, 20 March 2013

Primer issue closed Miles, Simon
Re: provenance working group teleconference agenda: March 21, 2013 Graham Klyne
Proposed response to PROV-AQ comments from James Anderson (updated) Graham Klyne
RE: provenance working group teleconference agenda: March 21, 2013 Miles, Simon
provenance working group teleconference agenda: March 21, 2013 Luc Moreau
Re: [PROV-AQ] Response to James Anderson Stian Soiland-Reyes

Monday, 18 March 2013

Re: prov-overview - call for suggestions Timothy Lebo
Re: prov-overview - call for suggestions Graham Klyne
prov-wg Telcon Minutes March 14, 2013 Paul Groth

Sunday, 17 March 2013

prov-overview - call for suggestions Paul Groth

Thursday, 14 March 2013

PROV-ISSUE-652 (final-revision-actions): Actions for final review period [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] Curt Tilmes
[PROV-AQ] Response to James Anderson Graham Klyne
Requesting reviews of Provenance Access and Query document. Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] Tom De Nies
Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] Luc Moreau
Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda March 14, 2013 Tom De Nies
Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-ISSUE-651: 3 comments on prov-o (wasDerived, wasAttrib, actedOnBehalf) Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-651: 3 comments on prov-o (wasDerived, wasAttrib, actedOnBehalf) Timothy Lebo
RE: PROV-ISSUE-651: 3 comments on prov-o (wasDerived, wasAttrib, actedOnBehalf) Miles, Simon
Re: PROV-ISSUE-651: 3 comments on prov-o (wasDerived, wasAttrib, actedOnBehalf) Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-651: 3 comments on prov-o (wasDerived, wasAttrib, actedOnBehalf) Luc Moreau
Re: Three comments Timothy Lebo
PROV-ISSUE-651: 3 comments on prov-o (wasDerived, wasAttrib, actedOnBehalf) Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
[PROV-AQ] Fwd: RFC 6892 on The 'describes' Link Relation Type Graham Klyne
Re: [IANA #660606] Request for MIME media type Text/Standards Tree - provenance-notation Stian Soiland-Reyes
prov-wg telcon - Important time change for Europeans (1 hour earlier!) Paul Groth
Fwd: [IANA #660606] Request for MIME media type Text/Standards Tree - provenance-notation Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 13 March 2013

prov-wg Telcon Agenda March 14, 2013 Paul Groth
PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Fwd: Tracking media-type registration requests Graham Klyne
RE: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-618: Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? Miles, Simon
Re: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-618: Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? Ivan Herman
Re: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-428: should we recommend RDF for provenance; define other mimetypes for other serializations? Paul Groth
Re: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-618: Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? Paul Groth
prov-wg: core paq issues - please think/discuss before telcon Paul Groth

Tuesday, 12 March 2013

Fwd: Re: Publication request for 13 PROV Documents (March 12) Luc Moreau
Re: typo in the #alternateOf example? Timothy Lebo
Re: typo in the #alternateOf example? Paul Groth
PROV-ISSUE-649: typo in alternateOf example. [PROV-O HTML] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: typo in the #alternateOf example? Timothy Lebo
Re: typo in the #alternateOf example? Timothy Lebo
Re: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-618: Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? Timothy Lebo
Re: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-618: Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? Graham Klyne
Re: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-618: Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-428: should we recommend RDF for provenance; define other mimetypes for other serializations? Jim McCusker

Monday, 11 March 2013

Re: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-618: Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? Luc Moreau
Re: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-428: should we recommend RDF for provenance; define other mimetypes for other serializations? Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-AQ responses to Stian's review (part 2) Stian Soiland-Reyes
Proposed response to PROV-AQ comments from James Anderson (updated) Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-AQ responses to Stian's review (part 1) Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-428: should we recommend RDF for provenance; define other mimetypes for other serializations? Paul Groth
RE: PROV-AQ responses to Dong's review Huynh T.D.
Re: PROV-AQ response to Ivan's review Ivan Herman
Re: PROV-AQ responses to Tim's review Timothy Lebo
Re: Proposed response to PROV-AQ comments from James Anderson Luc Moreau
Re: Proposed response to PROV-AQ comments from James Anderson Paul Groth
Proposed response to PROV-AQ comments from James Anderson Graham Klyne
[PROV-AQ] ISSUE-632: Should PROV-AQ be renamed Graham Klyne
[PROV-AQ] ISSUE-618: Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? Graham Klyne
[PROV-AQ] ISSUE-428: should we recommend RDF for provenance; define other mimetypes for other serializations? Graham Klyne
RE: PROV-AQ responses to Simon's review Miles, Simon
PROV-AQ issues pending review Graham Klyne
PROV-AQ responses to Tim's review Graham Klyne
PROV-AQ responses to Luc's review Graham Klyne
PROV-AQ responses to Simon's review Graham Klyne
PROV-AQ response to Ivan's review Graham Klyne
PROV-AQ responses to Dong's review Graham Klyne
PROV-AQ responses to Stian's review (part 1) Graham Klyne
PROV-AQ responses to Stian's review (part 2) Graham Klyne
Proposed timetable for PROV-AQ completion Graham Klyne

Sunday, 10 March 2013

Re: PROV-ISSUE-635 (prov-sem-completeness): Completeness and scope of prov-sem [Formal Semantics] Paul Groth

Friday, 8 March 2013

PROV Dictionary Khalid Belhajjame
Re: congratulations to provenance working group Khalid Belhajjame
Re: congratulations to provenance working group Paul Groth
Re: congratulations to provenance working group Daniel Garijo
Re: congratulations to provenance working group Paolo Missier
RE: congratulations to provenance working group Miles, Simon
congratulations to provenance working group Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-579 (declarative-fol-specification): Suggestion to replace procedural specification with (equivalent, but shorter and less prescriptive) declarative theory in First-Order Logic [prov-dm-constraints] James Cheney
Re: PROV-ISSUE-635 (prov-sem-completeness): Completeness and scope of prov-sem [Formal Semantics] James Cheney
PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

Thursday, 7 March 2013

Important: workplan till publication date Luc Moreau
Provenance Working Group Teleconference: Minutes of 07 March 2013 Luc Moreau
Re: prov-wg Minutes of the Feb. 28, 2013 Telcon Paul Groth
RE: prov-wg Minutes of the Feb. 28, 2013 Telcon Miles, Simon
Re: PROV-ISSUE-638 (TomDN): Notation of set of key-value pairs in contraints of PROV Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY] Paolo Missier
prov-wg Minutes of the Feb. 28, 2013 Telcon Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-639 (TomDN): Notation of hadDictionaryMember [PROV-DICTIONARY] Paolo Missier
PROV-ISSUE-647 (TomDN): Make prov:pariValue a subproperty of prov:entity? [PROV-DICTIONARY] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-646 (TomDN): (Editorial) Layout of the document (and specifically Section 4) [PROV-DICTIONARY] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-645 (TomDN): Should we add a new constraint on EmptyCollection and Dictionary? [PROV-DICTIONARY] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-644 (TomDN): (Editorial) Make sure production rules in grammar are regular text instead of CSS [PROV-DICTIONARY] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-643 (TomDN): Include additional constraint hadMember implies hadDictionaryMember with unknown key [PROV-DICTIONARY] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary in the document [PROV-DICTIONARY] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-641 (TomDN): Should qualifiedInsertion/Removal imply qualifiedDerivation? [PROV-DICTIONARY] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-640 (TomDN): Namespace and prefix in PROV Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-639 (TomDN): Notation of hadDictionaryMember [PROV-DICTIONARY] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-638 (TomDN): Notation of set of key-value pairs in contraints of PROV Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

Wednesday, 6 March 2013

Fwd: [Pubrules] HTML5 ok for Recommendations Paul Groth

Tuesday, 5 March 2013

PROV-implementations missing submissions! Stian Soiland-Reyes
FW: Chaos ahead (for Europeans): DST starts the coming week-end in the US Miles, Simon
Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview Stephan Zednik
Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] James Cheney
Chaos ahead (for Europeans): DST starts the coming week-end in the US Ivan Herman
Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: paq embedded provenance Ivan Herman
Re: paq embedded provenance Paul Groth
Re: paq embedded provenance Ivan Herman
paq embedded provenance Paul Groth
Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview Stephan Zednik
Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview Stephan Zednik

Monday, 4 March 2013

Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview Paul Groth
Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview Luc Moreau
Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview Paul Groth
Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document Stephan Zednik
Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview Paul Groth
Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview Curt Tilmes
Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview Stephan Zednik
Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview Stephan Zednik
Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview Paul Groth
Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview Luc Moreau
Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview Curt Tilmes
Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview Curt Tilmes
Re: Semantics staged James Cheney
Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview Paul Groth
Re: prov-dictionary Tom De Nies
staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview Luc Moreau
Re: dc-prov note working draft staged Luc Moreau
Re: Primer staged Luc Moreau
Re: dc-prov note working draft staged Daniel Garijo
Re: Fwd: Fwd: [IANA #660606] Request for MIME media type Text/Standards Tree - provenance-notation Luc Moreau
RE: Primer staged Miles, Simon
Re: Primer staged Luc Moreau
Re: dc-prov note working draft staged Luc Moreau
Re: dc-prov note working draft staged Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-636 (PROV-DC has provenance): Include has_provenance in PROV-DC Graham Klyne
PROV-ISSUE-637 (resolve dct:references): Discuss dct:references [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
dc-prov note working draft staged Daniel Garijo

Sunday, 3 March 2013

PROV-ISSUE-636 (PROV-DC has provenance): Include has_provenance in PROV-DC Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Semantics staged James Cheney

Saturday, 2 March 2013

Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] James Cheney

Friday, 1 March 2013

Primer staged Miles, Simon
PROV-ISSUE-635 (prov-sem-completeness): Completeness and scope of prov-sem [Formal Semantics] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: review of prov-xml Luc Moreau
Re: review of prov-xml Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: review of prov-xml Luc Moreau
Re: FW: The wasQuotedFrom relationship Paul Groth
FW: The wasQuotedFrom relationship Miles, Simon
Re: review of prov-xml Luc Moreau
Re: review of prov-xml Stian Soiland-Reyes

Last message date: Saturday, 30 March 2013 11:50:06 UTC