Tuesday, 30 April 2013
- Re: congratulations: PROV is a Recommendation
- Re: congratulations: PROV is a Recommendation
- Re: congratulations: PROV is a Recommendation
- Re: congratulations: PROV is a Recommendation
- Re: congratulations: PROV is a Recommendation
- Re: congratulations: PROV is a Recommendation
- Re: congratulations: PROV is a Recommendation
- Re: congratulations: PROV is a Recommendation
- congratulations: PROV is a Recommendation
- Re: updated prov-o provenance
- Re: updated prov-o provenance
- Re: updated prov-o provenance
- Re: updated prov-o provenance
- Re: updated prov-o provenance
- Re: provenance wg meeting minutes 2013-04-25
- Re: updated prov-o provenance
- provenance working teleconference 2013-05-02
- provenance wg meeting minutes 2013-04-25
- Re: updated prov-o provenance
- Re: prov-family is ready
Monday, 29 April 2013
- Re: prov-family is ready
- Re: prov-family is ready
- Re: prov-family is ready
- Re: prov-family is ready
- Re: prov-family is ready
- Re: prov-family is ready
- Re: prov-family is ready
- Re: prov-family is ready
- Re: prov-family is ready
- Re: prov-family is ready
- Re: updates of prov namespace
- Re: prov-family is ready
- Re: prov-family is ready
- Re: updates of prov namespace
- Re: prov-family is ready
- Re: prov-family is ready
- Re: Check list for the homestretch...
- Re: updates of prov namespace
- Re: prov-family is ready
- Re: Check list for the homestretch...
- Re: updates of prov namespace
- Re: Check list for the homestretch...
- Re: updates of prov namespace
- Re: prov-family is ready
- Re: prov-family is ready
- prov-family is ready
- Re: prov-family serializations
- Re: prov-family serializations
- Re: prov-family serializations
- Re: updated prov-o provenance
- Re: updated prov-o provenance
- Re: updates of prov namespace
- updated prov-o provenance
- Re: updates of prov namespace
- Re: updates of prov namespace
- Re: updates of prov namespace
- Re: updates of prov namespace
- Re: updates of prov namespace
- Re: prov-family serializations
- Re: updates of prov namespace
- updates of prov namespace
Saturday, 27 April 2013
- Re: where are we with the changes to documents regarding schemas/ontologies?
- Re: content of /ns
- Re: where are we with the changes to documents regarding schemas/ontologies?
- Re: [IANA #666222] Request for MIME media type Application/Standards Tree - provenance+xml
- Re: [IANA #666222] Request for MIME media type Application/Standards Tree - provenance+xml
Friday, 26 April 2013
- Re: [IANA #666222] Request for MIME media type Application/Standards Tree - provenance+xml
- Fwd: [IANA #666222] Request for MIME media type Application/Standards Tree - provenance+xml
- Re: prov-family serializations
- Re: For group review: the "namespace concatenation"
- Re: For group review: the "namespace concatenation"
- Re: For group review: the "namespace concatenation"
- Re: For group review: the "namespace concatenation"
- Re: For group review: the "namespace concatenation"
- Re: prov-aq - not RDF/XML
- Re: content of /ns
- Re: content of /ns
- For group review: the "namespace concatenation"
- Re: Change in repository location of 'staged' PROV-XML schemas
- prov-aq - not RDF/XML
- Re: Change in repository location of 'staged' PROV-XML schemas
- Re: where are we with the changes to documents regarding schemas/ontologies?
- Re: content of /ns
- Re: content of /ns
- Re: content of /ns
- Re: content of /ns
- Re: provenance of prov documents
- Re: provenance of prov documents
- Re: provenance of prov documents
- Re: content of /ns
- Re: content of /ns
- Re: content of /ns
- Re: namespace directory
- Re: content of /ns
- content of /ns
- Re: where are we with the changes to documents regarding schemas/ontologies?
- Re: update of prov-aq.ttl in namespace
- Re: where are we with the changes to documents regarding schemas/ontologies?
- Re: where are we with the changes to documents regarding schemas/ontologies?
- Re: where are we with the changes to documents regarding schemas/ontologies?
- where are we with the changes to documents regarding schemas/ontologies?
- prov-family serializations
- Re: Change in repository location of 'staged' PROV-XML schemas
Thursday, 25 April 2013
- Re: namespace directory
- Change in repository location of 'staged' PROV-XML schemas
- Re: prov-dictionary owl and xsd moved to NS + updates in staged document
- Re: namespace directory
- prov-dictionary owl and xsd moved to NS + updates in staged document
- namespace directory
- Re: Provenance of PROV documents
- Re: Provenance of PROV documents
- prov-wg Telcon Minutes of the April 18, 2013
- update of prov-aq.ttl in namespace
- Re: prov-xml mime type
- Re: prov-xml mime type
Wednesday, 24 April 2013
Tuesday, 23 April 2013
- Re: prov-dictionary title: biblio incorrect for all documents
- Re: prov-dictionary title: biblio incorrect for all documents
- Re: prov-dictionary title: biblio incorrect for all documents
- RE: prov-dictionary title: biblio incorrect for all documents
- Re: prov-dictionary title: biblio incorrect for all documents
- Re: prov-dictionary title: biblio incorrect for all documents
- Re: Final PROV-XML Staging
- Re: Final PROV-XML Staging
- Re: Final PROV-XML Staging
- prov-dictionary title: biblio incorrect for all documents
- Re: Final PROV-XML Staging
- prov-overview & prov-aq staged
- Re: Typos in PROV-N
- Re: dc review
Monday, 22 April 2013
- Re: provenance of prov documents
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary in the document [PROV-DICTIONARY]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-668 (TomDN): Disambiguated DBPedia URIs to QNames in XML example [PROV-DICTIONARY]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-660 (TomDN): Constraints of PROV-Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY]
Saturday, 20 April 2013
- Re: Check list for the homestretch...
- Check list for the homestretch...
- Re: Rec approval
- Rec approval
Friday, 19 April 2013
- Re: dc review
- Re: dc review
- Re: dc review
- Re: dc review
- Re: dc review
- Re: dc review
- Re: dc review
- Re: dc review
- Re: dc review
- Re: dc review
- Re: dc review
- Re: dc review
- Re: dc review
Thursday, 18 April 2013
- Re: dc review
- Re: Review of prov-dc
- Re: Late review of the PROV-DC mapping document
- Re: Review of prov-dc
- Re: Review of prov-dc
- Re: Review of prov-dc
- Re: Last-minute PROV-XML review/proofread
- Re: Review of prov-dc
- Re: Last-minute PROV-XML review/proofread
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-296 (TLebo): prov:Location rdfs:subClassOf wgs:SpatialThing ? [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-296 (TLebo): prov:Location rdfs:subClassOf wgs:SpatialThing ? [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-232 (TLebo): activity start/end: direct time upgrades to instantaneous events [Ontology]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-222 (used-objectproperty): Datatype property for used? [Ontology]
- Re: PROV-Dictionary staged for final vote
- Last-minute PROV-XML review/proofread
- Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda April 18, 2012
- Re: PROV-Overview review
- Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda April 18, 2012
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-665: PROV Identifier conventions clarification [XML Serialization]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-667: attribute/element/type usage conventions in note [XML Serialization]
- Re: Review of prov-dc
Wednesday, 17 April 2013
- Re: Typos in PROV-N
- Re: PROV-DM check
- Re: Typos in PROV-N
- Re: Revised PROV Overview
- Re: Revised PROV Overview
- Re: PROV-Overview review
- updated prov-overview for vote tomorrow
- Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda April 18, 2012
- PROV-Dictionary staged for final vote
- PROV-ISSUE-668 (TomDN): Disambiguated DBPedia URIs to QNames in XML example [PROV-DICTIONARY]
- Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda April 18, 2012
- Provenance of PROV documents
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-664: Use choice instead of sequence in document/bundle constructor
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-666: Valid namespaces for all PROV-XML Examples [XML Serialization]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-666: Valid namespaces for all PROV-XML Examples [XML Serialization]
- Re: {Disarmed} Re: PROV-XML staged, ready for review
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-667: attribute/element/type usage conventions in note [XML Serialization]
- PROV-ISSUE-667: attribute/element/type usage conventions in note [XML Serialization]
- PROV-ISSUE-666: Valid namespaces for all PROV-XML Examples [XML Serialization]
- PROV-ISSUE-665: PROV Identifier conventions clarification [XML Serialization]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-664: Use choice instead of sequence in document/bundle constructor
- PROV-ISSUE-664: Use choice instead of sequence in document/bundle constructor
Tuesday, 16 April 2013
- Re: Dagstuhl acknowledgement
- PROV-Overview review
- PROV-ISSUE-663 (Antoine-FB-DC): Antoine Isaac's Feedback on PROV-DC [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core]
- PROV-ISSUE-662 (stian-FB-DC): Stian's Feedback on PROV-DC [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core]
- Re: PROV-DC: dct:isVersionOf usage
- Re: comments on prov-xml
- Re: comments on prov-xml
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-661: schema appendix of PROV-XML Note [XML Serialization]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-661: schema appendix of PROV-XML Note [XML Serialization]
- Re: PROV-DC: dct:isVersionOf usage
- Re: PROV-DC: dct:isVersionOf usage
- Re: PROV-DC: dct:isVersionOf usage
- prov-wg Telcon Agenda April 18, 2012
- prov-wg April 11, 2013 Telcon Minutes
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-661: schema appendix of PROV-XML Note [XML Serialization]
- RE: link to ED's draft in final documents?
Monday, 15 April 2013
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-660 (TomDN): Constraints of PROV-Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary in the document [PROV-DICTIONARY]
- Typos in PROV-N
- PROV-DC: dct:isVersionOf usage
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary in the document [PROV-DICTIONARY]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary in the document [PROV-DICTIONARY]
- Re: link to ED's draft in final documents?
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary in the document [PROV-DICTIONARY]
- Re: link to ED's draft in final documents?
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary in the document [PROV-DICTIONARY]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary in the document [PROV-DICTIONARY]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-660 (TomDN): Constraints of PROV-Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY]
- Re: re-staged PROV-SEM
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary in the document [PROV-DICTIONARY]
- Re: re-staged PROV-SEM
- Re: re-staged PROV-SEM
- Re: typo in boilerplate
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-660 (TomDN): Constraints of PROV-Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY]
- Re: Late review of the PROV-DC mapping document
Sunday, 14 April 2013
Saturday, 13 April 2013
Friday, 12 April 2013
- re-staged PROV-SEM
- PROV-DM check part 1
- link to ED's draft in final documents?
- Re: prov-constraints is staged
- Re: [PROV-AQ] Editors' working copy updated (final pass?)
- Dagstuhl acknowledgement
- Re: prov-constraints is staged
- PROV-SEM acknowledgements/contributors
Thursday, 11 April 2013
- Re: Revised PROV Overview
- Re: typo in boilerplate
- Re: Revised PROV Overview
- typo in boilerplate
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-661: schema appendix of PROV-XML Note [XML Serialization]
- Re: {Disarmed} Re: PROV-XML staged, ready for review
- PROV-ISSUE-661: schema appendix of PROV-XML Note [XML Serialization]
- Re: {Disarmed} Re: PROV-XML staged, ready for review
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-635 (prov-sem-completeness): Completeness and scope of prov-sem [Formal Semantics]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-579 (declarative-fol-specification): Suggestion to replace procedural specification with (equivalent, but shorter and less prescriptive) declarative theory in First-Order Logic [prov-dm-constraints]
- Re: Review of PROV-AQ
- RE: today's call: scribe is needed, please
- comments on prov-xml
- today's call: scribe is needed, please
- Review of prov-dc
- Re: PROV-SEM staged, ready for review
- Re: PROV-SEM staged, ready for review
- Re: PROV-SEM staged, ready for review
- Re: PROV-SEM staged, ready for review
- Re: PROV-SEM staged, ready for review
- PROV-Dictionary update for telecon 4.11.2013
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-644 (TomDN): (Editorial) Make sure production rules in grammar are regular text instead of CSS [PROV-DICTIONARY]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-660 (TomDN): Constraints of PROV-Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY]
- PROV-ISSUE-660 (TomDN): Constraints of PROV-Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY]
- Re: PROV-SEM staged, ready for review
Wednesday, 10 April 2013
- Re: PROV-SEM staged, ready for review
- RE: Internal Review Prov Dictionary
- Re: Internal Review Prov Dictionary
- Revised PROV Overview
- Re: provenance working 2013.04.11 teleconference agenda
- Re: provenance working 2013.04.11 teleconference agenda
- Re: provenance working 2013.04.11 teleconference agenda
Tuesday, 9 April 2013
- PROV-ISSUE-659 (dc-prov-namespace): Namespace in DC Mapping Note, dereferenceability of URIs [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core]
- Re: Primer staged ready for review
- Fwd: Comments on "Dublin Core to PROV Mapping" - part 1 of 2
- Finalised primer staged
- Re: Primer staged ready for review
- Re: Primer staged ready for review
- RE: Primer staged ready for review
- RE: Primer staged ready for review
- RE: Primer staged ready for review
- provenance of prov documents
- Re: PROV-DM document
- Re: PROV-SEM staged, ready for review
- Re: Prov-DC ready for review
- provenance working 2013.04.11 teleconference agenda
- Re: Prov-DC ready for review
- Re: [PROV-AQ] Editors' working copy updated
- Re: mentionOf representation in RDF
- Re: PROV-XML staged, ready for review
- RE: PROV-SEM staged, ready for review
- Re: mentionOf representation in RDF (was: prov-links ready for review)
- mentionOf representation in RDF (was: prov-links ready for review)
- prov-constraints is staged
- Re: PROV-DM document
Monday, 8 April 2013
- PROV-DM document
- Re: prov-n is staged
- prov-n is staged
- Re: prov-links ready for review
- Re: prov-links ready for review
- Re: prov-links ready for review
- Re: prov-links ready for review
- Re: PROV-SEM staged, ready for review
- {Disarmed} Re: PROV-XML staged, ready for review
- prov-wg Telcon Minutes April 4, 2013
- Re: Review Prov-AQ
Friday, 5 April 2013
- Re: Review of PROV-AQ
- Re: [PROV-AQ] Editors' working copy updated
- PROV-AQ working copy updated
- PROV-SEM staged, ready for review
- RE: FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592)
- PROV-ISSUE-658 (rehgister-html5-link-relation-types): Register link relation types for use with HTML5 [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Review Prov-AQ
Thursday, 4 April 2013
- prov-implementations staged
- Re: reviews
- Re: prov-links ready for review
- Re: PROV-XML staged, ready for review
- RE: PROV-XML staged, ready for review
- Re: PROV-XML staged, ready for review
- PROV-XML staged, ready for review
- Re: ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly?
- Re: ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly?
- Re: ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly?
- Re: ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly?
- Re: ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly?
- Re: Primer staged ready for review
Wednesday, 3 April 2013
- Re: Primer staged ready for review
- Re: ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly?
- blog post on PROV tutorial at EDBT up
- Re: Prov-DC ready for review
- PROV-ISSUE-657 (PG DC review): Review from DC Note- Paul Groth [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-654 (primer-ducharme): Various clarifications and comments (Bob DuCharme) [Primer]
- Re: Prov-DC ready for review
- Re: ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly?
- Re: ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly?
- Review of PROV-AQ
- Re: reviews
- Re: Primer staged ready for review
- prov-wg Telcon Agenda April 4, 2013
- Re: Typo in bibliography (for all documents)
- Re: Primer staged ready for review
- Re: [PROV-AQ] Editors' working copy updated
- Re: Internal Review Prov Dictionary
- Re: ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly?
Tuesday, 2 April 2013
- Re: ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly?
- Re: ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly?
- ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly?
- Re: prov-links ready for review
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-654 (primer-ducharme): Various clarifications and comments (Bob DuCharme) [Primer]
- Typo in bibliography (for all documents)
- RE: Internal Review Prov Dictionary
- Re: Primer staged ready for review
Monday, 1 April 2013
- RE: prov-links ready for review
- Re: Primer staged ready for review
- Re: FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592)
- RE: FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592)
- Re: FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592)
- RE: FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592)
- Re: FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592)
- RE: FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592)
- Re: FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592)
- PROV-ISSUE-656 (TB review): Tom Baker's review on PROV-DC [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core]
- RE: FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592)
- Re: FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592)
- RE: FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592)