public-prov-wg@w3.org from October 2012 by date

Wednesday, 31 October 2012

Re: Comments on the Prov Primer Ivan Herman
Re: Reminder: Review of responses to PROV-CONSTRAINTS public comments James Cheney
Re: Reminder: Review of responses to PROV-CONSTRAINTS public comments Luc Moreau
Reminder: Review of responses to PROV-CONSTRAINTS public comments James Cheney
PROV WG Telecon 2012.11.01 Luc Moreau

Monday, 29 October 2012

Re: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria Craig M Trim

Tuesday, 30 October 2012

RE: PROV-ISSUE-410 (prov-primer-review): Feedback on Primer document [Primer] Miles, Simon
Re: Provenance Example for TriG Spec Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-573 (mime-type): mime type registration feedback [prov-n] Ivan Herman
Re: PROV-ISSUE-573 (mime-type): mime type registration feedback [prov-n] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-475: Request to drop "mention" and related elements [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-462 (entity-definition-precision): Definition o entity may be too liberal [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: Updates to PROV-XML Note draft. Hua, Hook (388C)
Updates to PROV-XML Note draft. Stephan Zednik
Re: pairs of implementations? Stephan Zednik

Monday, 29 October 2012

Re: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria Curt Tilmes
RE: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria Miles, Simon
Re: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria James Cheney
Re: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria Daniel Garijo
Re: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria Khalid Belhajjame
Re: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria Reza B'far
Re: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria Satya Sahoo
RE: Comments on the Prov Primer Miles, Simon
Re: Review of PROV-CONSTRAINTS issues (ISSUE-582, ISSUE-579, ISSUE-585, ISSUE-583) Paolo Missier
Re: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria Paolo Missier
Re: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria Tom De Nies
prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-560: type overlap question [prov-dm-constraints] James Cheney
Re: PROV-ISSUE-490 (prov-constraints-lc-editorial): PROV-CONSTRAINTS pre-Last Call editorial issues [prov-dm-constraints] James Cheney
Review of PROV-CONSTRAINTS issues (ISSUE-576, ISSUE-580, ISSUE-577, ISSUE-578, ISSUE-581) James Cheney
Re: PROV-ISSUE-472 (Feedback_IH): Review of the DC-NOTE by Ivan Herman [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] Ivan Herman

Sunday, 28 October 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-472 (Feedback_IH): Review of the DC-NOTE by Ivan Herman [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] Daniel Garijo

Saturday, 27 October 2012

Re: confirmation on changes to prov-n Paul Groth
Re: confirmation on changes to prov-n Luc Moreau
prov-wg draft agenda F2F4 Paul Groth
confirmation on changes to prov-n Paul Groth
prov-wg Minutes of the October 25, 2012 Telcon Paul Groth

Friday, 26 October 2012

Re: typo "addiition" in prov-o 3.1 editor's draft Timothy Lebo
Review of PROV-CONSTRAINTS issues (ISSUE-582, ISSUE-579, ISSUE-585, ISSUE-583) James Cheney
Re: PROV-ISSUE-556 (time-qualification): public comment: should qualfied and unqualified versions the same [prov-dm-constraints] Paul Groth
further responses and closed issues in prov-dm Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-556 (time-qualification): public comment: should qualfied and unqualified versions the same [prov-dm-constraints] James Cheney
Re: PROV-ISSUE-560: type overlap question [prov-dm-constraints] James Cheney
Re: PROV-ISSUE-559: For delegation, two agents need to have some overlap in their lifetime. [prov-dm-constraints] James Cheney
Re: PROV-ISSUE-575: identifier field [prov-dm-constraints] James Cheney
Re: PROV-ISSUE-575: identifier field [prov-dm-constraints] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-575: identifier field [prov-dm-constraints] James Cheney
Review of PROV_CONSTRAINTS issues (ISSUE-582, ISSUE-586, ISSUE-587, ISSUE-588) James Cheney

Thursday, 25 October 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-490 (prov-constraints-lc-editorial): PROV-CONSTRAINTS pre-Last Call editorial issues [prov-dm-constraints] James Cheney
PROV-ISSUE-588 (strictly-precedes-irreflexive): It is never specified explicitly that "strictly-precedes" is irreflexive [prov-dm-constraints] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-587 (rdf-analogies): Concerns about analogies to RDF blank nodes/semantics [prov-dm-constraints] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-586 (toplevel-bundle-description): The description of 'toplevel bundle' as 'set of statements not appearing in a named bundle' is unclear [prov-dm-constraints] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-585 (applying-satisfying-constraints): Suggestion to avoid discussing how to 'apply' constraints; clarify what it means to 'satisfy' constraints [prov-dm-constraints] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-584 (merging): The nonstandard/procedurally defined 'merging' operation on terms [prov-dm-constraints] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-583 (equivalent-instances-in-bundles): Questions concerning what it means for applications to treat equivalent instances 'in the same way', particularly in bundles. [prov-dm-constraints] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-582 (document-instance): 'of their respective documents.' should be '... of their respective instances.' [prov-dm-constraints] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-581 (avoid-specifying-algorithm): Suggestion to avoid wording that 'almost requires' using normalization to implement constraints [prov-dm-constraints] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-580 (drop-syntactic-sugar-definitions): Suggestion to drop definitions in section 4.1 since they are not needed if the semantics is defined more abstractly [prov-dm-constraints] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-579 (declarative-fol-specification): Suggestion to replace procedural specification with (equivalent, but shorter and less prescriptive) declarative theory in First-Order Logic [prov-dm-constraints] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-578 (equivalence): Use of "equivalent" incompatible with common uses of the term in logic/mathematics [prov-dm-constraints] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-577 (valid-vs-consistent): Terminology: valid vs. consistent [prov-dm-constraints] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
RE: PROV-ISSUE-402 (Feedback_SM): Feedback on the feedback from Simon Miles [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] Miles, Simon
Re: Syntax checking Turtle examples (ACTION-117) Paul Groth
Syntax checking Turtle examples (ACTION-117) Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: PROV-ISSUE-472 (Feedback_IH): Review of the DC-NOTE by Ivan Herman [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] Ivan Herman
Re: Provenance specs: have we lost sight of the goal? Daniel Garijo
Re: Provenance specs: have we lost sight of the goal? Paul Groth
Re: acknowledging PROV responses (ISSUE-516) Timothy Lebo
Re: on specialization/alternate/membership (ISSUE-525) Timothy Lebo
Re: Provenance specs: have we lost sight of the goal? Timothy Lebo
Re: Provenance specs: have we lost sight of the goal? Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: PROV-ISSUE-576: logical definition and comments on prov-constratins [prov-dm-constraints] James Cheney
Re: PROV-ISSUE-472 (Feedback_IH): Review of the DC-NOTE by Ivan Herman [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] Daniel Garijo
Fwd: activity delegation (ISSUE-522) Luc Moreau
Re: acknowledging PROV responses (ISSUE-516) Daniel Garijo
Re: acknowledging PROV responses (ISSUE-516) Paul Groth
Re: acknowledging PROV responses (ISSUE-516) Luc Moreau
Re: on specialization/alternate/membership (ISSUE-525) James Cheney
Re: on specialization/alternate/membership (ISSUE-525) Paul Groth
on specialization/alternate/membership (ISSUE-525) Luc Moreau
closing some prov-dm issues Luc Moreau
Re: Presentation on Prov yesterday Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 24 October 2012

Re: Presentation on Prov yesterday Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-568 (hadRole-domain): domain of prov:hadRole [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-472 (Feedback_IH): Review of the DC-NOTE by Ivan Herman [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] Ivan Herman
Re: PROV-ISSUE-472 (Feedback_IH): Review of the DC-NOTE by Ivan Herman [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] Daniel Garijo
prov-wg: Telcon Agenda October 25, 2012 Paul Groth

Tuesday, 23 October 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-472 (Feedback_IH): Review of the DC-NOTE by Ivan Herman [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-568 (hadRole-domain): domain of prov:hadRole [Ontology] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-568 (hadRole-domain): domain of prov:hadRole [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-576: logical definition and comments on prov-constratins [prov-dm-constraints] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-576: logical definition and comments on prov-constratins [prov-dm-constraints] James Cheney
Re: [PROV-O] Proposed OWL change: Dealing with Issue 568 (hadRole) Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-576: logical definition and comments on prov-constratins [prov-dm-constraints] Ivan Herman
Re: [PROV-O] Proposed OWL change: Dealing with Issue 568 (hadRole) Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-495: ivan's feedback on prov-dm LC [prov-dm] Ivan Herman
Re: PROV-ISSUE-576: logical definition and comments on prov-constratins [prov-dm-constraints] James Cheney
Re: last call for comments on exit criteria Timothy Lebo
Re: prov-wg: Minutes of the October 18, 2012 Telecon Paul Groth
Re: prov-wg: Minutes of the October 18, 2012 Telecon Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-472 (Feedback_IH): Review of the DC-NOTE by Ivan Herman [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] Ivan Herman
prov-wg: Minutes of the October 18, 2012 Telecon Paul Groth
last call for comments on exit criteria Paul Groth
PROV-ISSUE-576: logical definition and comments on prov-constratins [prov-dm-constraints] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-446: prov:involvee not documented in PROV-O [PROV-O HTML] Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-446: prov:involvee not documented in PROV-O [PROV-O HTML] Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-462 (entity-definition-precision): Definition o entity may be too liberal [prov-dm] Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-472 (Feedback_IH): Review of the DC-NOTE by Ivan Herman [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-463 (freimuth): comments from robert freimuth [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: [PROV-O] Proposed OWL change: Dealing with Issue 568 (hadRole) Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-462 (entity-definition-precision): Definition o entity may be too liberal [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-462 (entity-definition-precision): Definition o entity may be too liberal [prov-dm] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-568 (hadRole-domain): domain of prov:hadRole [Ontology] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-462 (entity-definition-precision): Definition o entity may be too liberal [prov-dm] Paul Groth
Re: proposed responses to public comments (deadline Wednesday 24th, midnight GMT) Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-462 (entity-definition-precision): Definition o entity may be too liberal [prov-dm] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: [PROV-O] Proposed OWL change: Dealing with Issue 568 (hadRole) Daniel Garijo
Re: feedback sought on ISSUE-529, ISSUE-524, ISSUE5-519, ISSUE-523 Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-568 (hadRole-domain): domain of prov:hadRole [Ontology] Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-499: Data Model Section 2.1.1, semantics [prov-dm] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-567 (Link-to-inverse-prop-missing): The link ti the inverse property file is missing in the ontology [PROV-O HTML] Daniel Garijo

Monday, 22 October 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-568 (hadRole-domain): domain of prov:hadRole [Ontology] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-568 (hadRole-domain): domain of prov:hadRole [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-462 (entity-definition-precision): Definition o entity may be too liberal [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-463 (freimuth): comments from robert freimuth [prov-dm] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-462 (entity-definition-precision): Definition o entity may be too liberal [prov-dm] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-402 (Feedback_SM): Feedback on the feedback from Simon Miles [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] Daniel Garijo
Re: Dealing with mutable resources (PROV-O in Callimachus) - ISSUE-569 Paul Groth
RE: Dealing with mutable resources (PROV-O in Callimachus) - ISSUE-569 Miles, Simon
Re: Dealing with mutable resources (PROV-O in Callimachus) - ISSUE-569 Luc Moreau
Re: Dealing with mutable resources (PROV-O in Callimachus) - ISSUE-569 Paul Groth
RE: Dealing with mutable resources (PROV-O in Callimachus) - ISSUE-569 Miles, Simon
proposed responses to public comments (deadline Wednesday 24th, midnight GMT) Luc Moreau
ISSUE-475: Request to drop "mention" and related elements Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-495: ivan's feedback on prov-dm LC [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-495: ivan's feedback on prov-dm LC [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-495: ivan's feedback on prov-dm LC [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-463 (freimuth): comments from robert freimuth [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-498: Data Model Table 2 [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-462 (entity-definition-precision): Definition o entity may be too liberal [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
PROV-ISSUE-575: identifier field [prov-dm-constraints] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: pairs of implementations? Stephan Zednik
Re: Dealing with mutable resources (PROV-O in Callimachus) - ISSUE-569 Paul Groth
Re: Dealing with mutable resources (PROV-O in Callimachus) - ISSUE-569 Luc Moreau

Sunday, 21 October 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-573 (mime-type): mime type registration feedback [prov-n] Graham Klyne
Re: RDF WG responses Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n] Graham Klyne

Friday, 19 October 2012

Revised Exit Criteria - final comments Paul Groth
Re: pairs of implementations? Paul Groth
Re: pairs of implementations? Stephan Zednik
pairs of implementations? Paul Groth
Re: [PROV-O] Proposed OWL change: Dealing with Issue 568 (hadRole) Paul Groth
Re: [PROV-O] Proposed OWL change: Dealing with Issue 568 (hadRole) Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-ISSUE-446: prov:involvee not documented in PROV-O [PROV-O HTML] Paul Groth
Re: [PROV-O] Proposed OWL change: Dealing with Issue 568 (hadRole) Paul Groth
Re: [PROV-O] Proposed OWL change: Dealing with Issue 568 (hadRole) Stephan Zednik
Re: [PROV-O] Proposed OWL change: Dealing with Issue 568 (hadRole) Daniel Garijo
Re: [PROV-O] Proposed OWL change: Dealing with Issue 568 (hadRole) Stephan Zednik
Re: prov-dm issues under review Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-446: prov:involvee not documented in PROV-O [PROV-O HTML] Daniel Garijo
[PROV-O] Proposed OWL change: Dealing with Issue 568 (hadRole) Daniel Garijo
Re: prov-dm issues under review Paul Groth
Re: prov-dm issues under review Luc Moreau

Thursday, 18 October 2012

scribe needed Paul Groth
Re: reminder about prov exit criteria Luc Moreau
RDF WG responses Ivan Herman
Fwd: clock change reminder; 28-Oct to 4-Nov Ivan Herman
Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda Oct. 18, 2012 Paul Groth
PROV-WG telcon minutes Luc Moreau
Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda Oct. 18, 2012 Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 17 October 2012

2nd CFP: BigPROV @EDBT 2013 and ProvBench: Managing and Querying Provenance Data at Scale Paolo Missier
Test cases for PROV-CONSTRAINTS Huynh T.D.
Re: Dealing with mutable resources (PROV-O in Callimachus) - ISSUE-569 Paul Groth
Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda Oct. 18, 2012 Paul Groth
Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda Oct. 18, 2012 James Cheney
prov-n issues under review Paul Groth
prov-dm issues under review Paul Groth
RE: PROV-ISSUE-574 (primer-figure): Update primer overview figure [Primer] Miles, Simon
prov-wg Telcon Agenda Oct. 18, 2012 Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-574 (primer-figure): Update primer overview figure [Primer] Luc Moreau
RE: PROV-ISSUE-574 (primer-figure): Update primer overview figure [Primer] Miles, Simon
reminder about prov exit criteria Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-499: Data Model Section 2.1.1, semantics [prov-dm] Paul Groth

Tuesday, 16 October 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n] Ivan Herman
Re: PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n] Luc Moreau
Re: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/17) Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-574 (primer-figure): Update primer overview figure [Primer] Luc Moreau
Re: Primary Source again (Re: PROV-ISSUE-518: Data Model Section 5.2.4 ) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-499: Data Model Section 2.1.1, semantics [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
PROV-ISSUE-574 (primer-figure): Update primer overview figure [Primer] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
RE: Editorial error in the primer Miles, Simon
Re: PROV-ISSUE-573 (mime-type): mime type registration feedback [prov-n] Ivan Herman
Re: Compliance with PROV-N (related to PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n]) Ivan Herman
Re: PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n] Ivan Herman
Re: PROV-ISSUE-573 (mime-type): mime type registration feedback [prov-n] Luc Moreau
Compliance with PROV-N (related to PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n]) Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-477 (rename toplevel-bundle): rename toplevel-bundle to dataset [prov-n] Luc Moreau
RE: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) Miles, Simon

Monday, 15 October 2012

prov-n proposed responses to comments (deadline Thursday 12noon GMT) Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-544: Notation Section 3.7 [prov-n] Luc Moreau
PROV-ISSUE-573 (mime-type): mime type registration feedback [prov-n] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-539: Notation Section 3, EBNF format [prov-n] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-540: Notation Section 3, structure of documentation [prov-n] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-546: Notation Section 3.7.4 [prov-n] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-533: Notation, of attributes [prov-n] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-538: Notation Section 2.4, example 2 [prov-n] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-536: Notation Section 2.3 [prov-n] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-534: Notation Section 2.1 [prov-n] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-535: Notation Section 2.2 [prov-n] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-537: Notation Section 2.4 [prov-n] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-545: Notation Section 3.7.2 [prov-n] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-546: Notation Section 3.7.4 [prov-n] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-543: Notation Section 3.5 [prov-n] Luc Moreau
Re: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-541: Notation Section 3.1.3 [prov-n] Luc Moreau
RE: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) Miles, Simon
Fwd: New public IRC server refuses passwords Ivan Herman
prov-n issues closed Luc Moreau
proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/17) Luc Moreau
Re: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) Luc Moreau
Re: alternate of and sambas Jim McCusker
Re: alternate of and sambas Jim McCusker

Sunday, 14 October 2012

Re: alternate of and sambas Graham Klyne
Re: alternate of and sambas Graham Klyne

Friday, 12 October 2012

Thursday, 11 October 2012

Re: alternate of and sambas Jim McCusker
alternate of and sambas Paul Groth
Re: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) Jim McCusker
RE: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) Miles, Simon
scribe required for today, thanks! Luc Moreau
Re: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) James Cheney
Re: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) Luc Moreau
RE: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) Miles, Simon
Revised exit criteria Paul Groth
RE: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) Miles, Simon
Re: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) Luc Moreau
RE: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) Miles, Simon
Re: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) James Cheney
PROV-ISSUE-572: What constraints should we have on ordering of elements within the main complexTypes? [XML Serialization] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) Luc Moreau
Re: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 10 October 2012 Timothy Lebo
Re: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) Luc Moreau
Re: Provenance specs: have we lost sight of the goal? Reza B'Far (Oracle)

Wednesday, 10 October 2012

RE: Provenance specs: have we lost sight of the goal? Freimuth, Robert, Ph.D.
Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 10 October 2012 Khalid Belhajjame
Re: Provenance specs: have we lost sight of the goal? Curt Tilmes
RE: Dealing with mutable resources (PROV-O in Callimachus) - ISSUE-569 Miles, Simon
Dealing with mutable resources (PROV-O in Callimachus) - ISSUE-569 Paul Groth
PROV-ISSUE-570 (changing resources): How do we deal with resources that change? [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-571 (changing resources): How do we deal with resources that change? [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-569 (changing resources): How do we deal with resources that change? [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Presentation on Prov yesterday Ivan Herman
Re: PROV-ISSUE-520: Data Model Section 5.3.1 [prov-dm] Paul Groth
Re: Provenance specs: have we lost sight of the goal? Tom De Nies
Re: Provenance specs: have we lost sight of the goal? Paolo Missier
Re: PROV-ISSUE-563 (primer-alternates-figure): Primer Section 3.9 Alternates [Primer] Paolo Missier
Re: Provenance specs: have we lost sight of the goal? Paul Groth
Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 10 October 2012 Daniel Garijo

Tuesday, 9 October 2012

Provenance specs: have we lost sight of the goal? Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 10 October 2012 Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 10 October 2012 Paul Groth
PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 10 October 2012 Luc Moreau
Re: Editorial error in the primer Paul Groth
prov-wg Telcon Minutes October 4, 2012 Paul Groth
RE: PROV-ISSUE-563 (primer-alternates-figure): Primer Section 3.9 Alternates [Primer] Miles, Simon
Re: prov-dm normative sections (ISSUE-495) Luc Moreau
RE: Editorial error in the primer Miles, Simon
Re: prov-dm normative sections (ISSUE-495) James Cheney
RE: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) Miles, Simon
Re: PROV-ISSUE-530: Data Model Section 5.7.2 (Table 6) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
RE: PROV-ISSUE-530: Data Model Section 5.7.2 (Table 6) [prov-dm] Miles, Simon
RE: feedback sought on ISSUE-529, ISSUE-524, ISSUE5-519, ISSUE-523 Miles, Simon
Re: PROV-ISSUE-482: [external question] bundle IDs on insertion, context [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
RE: PROV-ISSUE-482: [external question] bundle IDs on insertion, context [prov-dm] Miles, Simon
RE: PROV-ISSUE-482: [external question] bundle IDs on insertion, context [prov-dm] Miles, Simon
Re: PROV-ISSUE-482: [external question] bundle IDs on insertion, context [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: prov-dm normative sections (ISSUE-495) Luc Moreau
feedback sought on ISSUE-529, ISSUE-524, ISSUE5-519, ISSUE-523 Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-530: Data Model Section 5.7.2 (Table 6) [prov-dm] Paolo Missier

Monday, 8 October 2012

proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-522: Data Model Section 5.3.4 [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-521: Data Model Section 5.3.3 [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: ISSUE-520 response Paul Groth
Re: ISSUE-520 response Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-530: Data Model Section 5.7.2 (Table 6) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
PROV-ISSUE-568 (hadRole-domain): domain of prov:hadRole [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

Sunday, 7 October 2012

Saturday, 6 October 2012

Friday, 5 October 2012

Thursday, 4 October 2012

Re: prov-wg - Telcon Agenda October 3, 2012 Tom De Nies

Wednesday, 3 October 2012

RE: PROV-ISSUE-515: Data Model Section 5.1.8 [prov-dm] Freimuth, Robert, Ph.D.
RE: PROV-ISSUE-530: Data Model Section 5.7.2 (Table 6) [prov-dm] Freimuth, Robert, Ph.D.
RE: PROV-ISSUE-520: Data Model Section 5.3.1 [prov-dm] Freimuth, Robert, Ph.D.
Re: PROV-ISSUE-520: Data Model Section 5.3.1 [prov-dm] Paul Groth
RE: PROV-ISSUE-520: Data Model Section 5.3.1 [prov-dm] Freimuth, Robert, Ph.D.
RE: PROV-ISSUE-521: Data Model Section 5.3.3 [prov-dm] Freimuth, Robert, Ph.D.
Re: PROV-ISSUE-516: Data Model Section 5.2.1 [prov-dm] Paul Groth
RE: PROV-ISSUE-516: Data Model Section 5.2.1 [prov-dm] Freimuth, Robert, Ph.D.
prov-wg - Telcon Agenda October 3, 2012 Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-516: Data Model Section 5.2.1 [prov-dm] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-516: Data Model Section 5.2.1 [prov-dm] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-516: Data Model Section 5.2.1 [prov-dm] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-516: Data Model Section 5.2.1 [prov-dm] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-522: Data Model Section 5.3.4 [prov-dm] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-513: Data Model Section 5.1.6 [prov-dm] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-516: Data Model Section 5.2.1 [prov-dm] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: batch 3 (18 issues): proposed responses to public comments (deadline Wednesday Oct 3rd) Paul Groth
UML and upper case labels Paul Groth
subactivity resolutions Paul Groth
ISSUE-520 response Paul Groth

Tuesday, 2 October 2012

PROV-ISSUE-567 (Link-to-inverse-prop-missing): The link ti the inverse property file is missing in the ontology [PROV-O HTML] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

Monday, 1 October 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-565 (rdfa-check): Do the suggested way of pointing to provenance work in rdfa [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Ivan Herman
PROV-ISSUE-566 (fix-images): HTML images still have references to the bundles as named greaphs [PROV-O HTML] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Editorial error in the primer Ivan Herman
Re: PROV-ISSUE-565 (rdfa-check): Do the suggested way of pointing to provenance work in rdfa [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Ivan Herman
Re: Editorial error in the primer Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-565 (rdfa-check): Do the suggested way of pointing to provenance work in rdfa [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Paul Groth
Re: Editorial error in the primer Ivan Herman
Re: Editorial error in the primer Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-565 (rdfa-check): Do the suggested way of pointing to provenance work in rdfa [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Ivan Herman
Re: Editorial error in the primer Ivan Herman

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 October 2012 18:03:08 UTC