public-prov-wg@w3.org from May 2012 by date

Thursday, 31 May 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-364 (collection-constraints-bugs): Collection constraint has wrong syntax for memberOf [prov-dm-constraints] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-345 (delineate-constraints): style hinders readability: constraints not separated clearly enough [prov-dm-constraints] Luc Moreau
• ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: Definition of role Luc Moreau
• RE: Definition of role Miles, Simon
• Re: Definition of role Luc Moreau
• Re: Definition of role Graham Klyne
• Re: Definition of role Graham Klyne
• RE: Definition of role Miles, Simon
• Definition of role Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] Jim McCusker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] Graham Klyne
• Dublin Core - PROV Mapping, Call for Feedback (until June 5th) Daniel Garijo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-267 (TLebo): annotate all subproperty axioms to justify them [Ontology] Stephan Zednik

Wednesday, 30 May 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-379 (jzhao): Update provo html section 3.1 [PROV-O HTML] Timothy Lebo
• PROV-ISSUE-386: 3.2 missing terms in turtle examples Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Dublin Core - PROV Mapping, Call for Feedback (until June 5th) Kai Eckert
• Re: delegation definition Luc Moreau
• RE: delegation definition Miles, Simon
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: delegation definition Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: revised prov-dm document (ISSUE-331) Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-133 (YolandaGil): Producing and delivering resources as part of provenance in Provenance Data Model (PROV-DM) Draft [Data Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-223 (definition-of-entity): What is the definition of entity [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-376 (rename-responsibility): Renaming Responsibility (to Behalf?) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 31 May 2012 Luc Moreau
• Re: delegation definition Luc Moreau
• Re: delegation definition Luc Moreau
• Re: delegation definition Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] Luc Moreau

Tuesday, 29 May 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Fwd: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] Graham Klyne
• Re: delegation definition Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Graham Klyne
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] Miles, Simon
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] Miles, Simon

Monday, 28 May 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] Jim McCusker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• reminder: prov-o telecon today Timothy Lebo
• prov-wg: Telecon Minutes May 24, 2012 Paul Groth

Saturday, 26 May 2012

• RE: delegation definition Miles, Simon
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] Paul Groth

Friday, 25 May 2012

• Re: delegation definition Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-379 (jzhao): Update provo html section 3.1 [PROV-O HTML] Jun Zhao
• Re: delegation definition Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-374 (member-membership-indirection): indirection for Dictionary members [Ontology] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: delegation definition Daniel Garijo
• Re: delegation definition Tom De Nies
• Re: delegation definition Paul Groth
• Re: delegation definition Eric
• Re: delegation definition Timothy Lebo

Thursday, 24 May 2012

• Re: delegation definition Stephan Zednik
• IPAW 2012: hotel rates expire tomorrow! James Frew
• PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: delegation definition Reza B'Far (Oracle)
• delegation definition Luc Moreau
• Re: Review and next steps on PROV-CONSTRAINTS Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-379 (jzhao): Update provo html section 3.1 [PROV-O HTML] Paul Groth
• Re: respec: misbalanced appendices Luc Moreau
• respec: misbalanced appendices Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-379 (jzhao): Update provo html section 3.1 [PROV-O HTML] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-375 (owl-property-links): link to OWL property types in PROV-O [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Timothy Lebo

Wednesday, 23 May 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Paul Groth
• PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-382 (jzhao): Qualification patters in prov-o section 3.3 [PROV-O HTML] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-381 (jzhao): Feedback and refactoring suggestion to prov-o section 3.2 [PROV-O HTML] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-350 (xref-with-unions): cross references with union domains fail [PROV-O HTML] Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-379 (jzhao): Update provo html section 3.1 [PROV-O HTML] Jun Zhao
• Call for Participation: IPAW 2012 James Frew
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Paolo Missier

Tuesday, 22 May 2012

• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Reza B'Far (Oracle)
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Reza B'Far (Oracle)
• prov-wg: Telecon Agenda May 25, 2012 Paul Groth
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Paolo Missier
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Timothy Lebo
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Paolo Ncl
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Timothy Lebo
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Paolo Missier
• Re: [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-378 (clarifyHadActivity): clarify hadActivity [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
• Re: [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-378 (clarifyHadActivity): clarify hadActivity [Ontology] Daniel Garijo
• [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-378 (clarifyHadActivity): clarify hadActivity [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Timothy Lebo
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Paolo Missier
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Paolo Missier
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Curt Tilmes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-379 (jzhao): Update provo html section 3.1 [PROV-O HTML] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-380 (start-hadActivity): Missing hadActivity reference on Start [PROV-O HTML] Timothy Lebo
• PROV-ISSUE-380 (start-hadActivity): Missing hadActivity reference on Start [PROV-O HTML] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-379 (jzhao): Update provo html section 3.1 [PROV-O HTML] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Graham Klyne
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Luc Moreau
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-378 (clarifyHadActivity): clarify hadActivity [Ontology] Daniel Garijo
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Graham Klyne
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Graham Klyne

Monday, 21 May 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-378 (clarifyHadActivity): clarify hadActivity [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-378 (clarifyHadActivity): clarify hadActivity [Ontology] Daniel Garijo
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-345 (delineate-constraints): style hinders readability: constraints not separated clearly enough [prov-dm-constraints] James Cheney
• Re: [owl changed] prov:value versus KeyValuePair Timothy Lebo
• [owl changed] justified: wasAttributedTo subpropertyOf tracedTo Timothy Lebo
• Re: [owl changed] PROV-ISSUE-372 (qualified-property-chains): ( prov:qualifedUsage prov:entity ) rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:used Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-350 (xref-with-unions): cross references with union domains fail [PROV-O HTML] Timothy Lebo
• Re: [owl changed] prov:value versus KeyValuePair Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-345 (delineate-constraints): style hinders readability: constraints not separated clearly enough [prov-dm-constraints] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-343 (account-objections): Objections regarding Account [prov-dm-constraints] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-346 (distinguish-constraints): types of constraints unclear [prov-dm-constraints] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-315 (dgarijo): Mapping of subclass relationships [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-346 (distinguish-constraints): types of constraints unclear [prov-dm-constraints] James Cheney
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-345 (delineate-constraints): style hinders readability: constraints not separated clearly enough [prov-dm-constraints] James Cheney
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-343 (account-objections): Objections regarding Account [prov-dm-constraints] James Cheney
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-333 (review-prov-dm-constraints-wd5): issue to collect feedback on prov-dm-constraints wd5 [prov-dm-constraints] James Cheney
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-221 (constraint-was-associated-with): What are the constraints for wasAssociatedWith and actedOnBehalfOf? [prov-dm] James Cheney
• prov-o meeting today - reminder Timothy Lebo
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Timothy Lebo
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Paolo Missier
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Paul Groth
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Graham Klyne
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Tom De Nies

Sunday, 20 May 2012

• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Timothy Lebo
• RE: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Miles, Simon
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Curt Tilmes
• Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization Paul Groth

Saturday, 19 May 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-350 (xref-with-unions): cross references with union domains fail [PROV-O HTML] Paul Groth

Friday, 18 May 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-213 (prov-sem-events): Alignment of events in PROV-DM vs PROV-SEM [Formal Semantics] Luc Moreau
• Re: generation by two distinct activities? Luc Moreau
• Re: provenance of provenance Luc Moreau
• Re: provenance of provenance Luc Moreau
• Re: provenance of provenance Luc Moreau
• Re: provenance of provenance Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-378 (clarifyHadActivity): clarify hadActivity [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
• prov-wg meeting minutes 2012-05-17 Luc Moreau
• PROV-ISSUE-378 (clarifyHadActivity): clarify hadActivity [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

Thursday, 17 May 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-362 (altOf-www): alternateOf is to handle levels of specificity, not the wild wild west of WWW URI selection [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• [owl changed] Re: prov:value versus KeyValuePair Timothy Lebo
• Re: Review and next steps on PROV-CONSTRAINTS Timothy Lebo
• prov-o team agenda items for next week Timothy Lebo
• Re: generation by two distinct activities? Timothy Lebo
• Re: provenance of provenance Luc Moreau
• Re: Review and next steps on PROV-CONSTRAINTS Timothy Lebo
• Re: provenance of provenance Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-213 (prov-sem-events): Alignment of events in PROV-DM vs PROV-SEM [Formal Semantics] James Cheney
• Re: prov-dm: outstanding issues to close Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: Review and next steps on PROV-CONSTRAINTS Timothy Lebo
• RE: today's call: scribe required, please Miles, Simon
• today's call: scribe required, please Luc Moreau
• Re: provenance of provenance Luc Moreau
• Re: provenance of provenance Luc Moreau
• Re: generation by two distinct activities? Luc Moreau
• generation by two distinct activities? Timothy Lebo
• Re: provenance of provenance Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: Proposal for restructuring PROV-DM into core+extensions Graham Klyne

Wednesday, 16 May 2012

• Re: provenance of provenance Satya Sahoo
• Re: provenance of provenance Jun Zhao
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-281 (TLebo): prov-o namspaces are not dereferencable [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
• Re: provenance of provenance Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-373: trim qualified from "3.2 expanded" [PROV-O HTML] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: [owl changed] PROV-ISSUE-372 (qualified-property-chains): ( prov:qualifedUsage prov:entity ) rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:used Timothy Lebo
• PROV-ISSUE-377 (rl-plus-plus-justify): All RL "violations" justified appendix [PROV-O HTML] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 17 May 2012 Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-375 (owl-property-links): link to OWL property types in PROV-O [Ontology] Ivan Herman
• Re: provenance of provenance Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: [owl changed] PROV-ISSUE-372 (qualified-property-chains): ( prov:qualifedUsage prov:entity ) rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:used Ivan Herman
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-373: trim qualified from "3.2 expanded" [PROV-O HTML] Ivan Herman
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-281 (TLebo): prov-o namspaces are not dereferencable [Ontology] Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 15 May 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-213 (prov-sem-events): Alignment of events in PROV-DM vs PROV-SEM [Formal Semantics] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-283 (TLebo): Account, Note, Plan and Location subclasses of Entity? [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Timothy Lebo
• Re: http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/products/9 Issues Timothy Lebo
• PROV-ISSUE-376 (rename-responsibility): Renaming Responsibility (to Behalf?) [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: provenance of provenance Timothy Lebo
• Fwd: PROV-ISSUE-373: trim qualified from "3.2 expanded" [PROV-O HTML] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Daniel Garijo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-281 (TLebo): prov-o namspaces are not dereferencable [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-350 (xref-with-unions): cross references with union domains fail [PROV-O HTML] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] Reza B'Far (Oracle)
• RE: prov:value versus KeyValuePair Evain, Jean-Pierre
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-370 (tracedTo-inference-only): Should tracedTo be moved to prov-constraints and be defined as a binary relation that can be inferred [prov-dm] James Cheney
• PROV-ISSUE-375 (owl-property-links): link to OWL property types in PROV-O [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: prov:value versus KeyValuePair Luc Moreau
• Re: prov:value versus KeyValuePair Timothy Lebo
• Re: prov:value versus KeyValuePair Stephan Zednik
• Re: prov:value versus KeyValuePair Timothy Lebo
• Re: prov:value versus KeyValuePair Timothy Lebo
• Re: prov:value versus KeyValuePair Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: prov:value versus KeyValuePair Stephan Zednik
• Re: prov:value versus KeyValuePair Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: prov:value versus KeyValuePair Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-370 (tracedTo-inference-only): Should tracedTo be moved to prov-constraints and be defined as a binary relation that can be inferred [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-368 (no-responsibility-in-derivation): No responsibility in derivation [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: prov:value versus KeyValuePair Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-370 (tracedTo-inference-only): Should tracedTo be moved to prov-constraints and be defined as a binary relation that can be inferred [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: [owl changed] PROV-ISSUE-372 (qualified-property-chains): ( prov:qualifedUsage prov:entity ) rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:used Stian Soiland-Reyes
• [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-295 (TLebo): hasAnnotation [ a prov:Note ] [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-340 (start-by-activity-is-comm): Start by Activity is Communication; drop it. [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-369 (drop-startByActivity): Should we drop wasStartedByActivity? [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-369 (drop-startByActivity): Should we drop wasStartedByActivity? [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-223 (definition-of-entity): What is the definition of entity [prov-dm] Tom De Nies
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-295 (TLebo): hasAnnotation [ a prov:Note ] [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-340 (start-by-activity-is-comm): Start by Activity is Communication; drop it. [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-223 (definition-of-entity): What is the definition of entity [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-257 (TLebo): rename "Account"/"Bundle"/"AccountEntity" to "Provenance" [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-257 (TLebo): rename "Account"/"Bundle"/"AccountEntity" to "Provenance" [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-88 (Provenance-container): Provenance container seems an unnecessary concept Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-223 (definition-of-entity): What is the definition of entity [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 17 May 2012 Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-354 (all-or-nothing-for-optional-arguments): Adopt an all-or-nothing approach to optional positional arguments [prov-n] James Cheney
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-353 (optional-id-syntactic-marker): Introduce a syntactic marker for when optional id is expressed [prov-n] James Cheney
• Re: prov:value versus KeyValuePair Luc Moreau
• PROV-ISSUE-374 (member-membership-indirection): indirection for Dictionary members [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• prov:value versus KeyValuePair Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: provenance of provenance Daniel Garijo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• InstantaneousEvent disjointness Timothy Lebo

Monday, 14 May 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Daniel Garijo
• [owl changed] hadQuoter hadQuoted and wasApprovedBy Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• [owl changed] InstantaneousEvent disjoints Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Daniel Garijo
• RE: provenance of provenance Miles, Simon
• [owl changed] Re: prov-o telecon today Timothy Lebo
• Re: prov-o telecon today Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-281 (TLebo): prov-o namspaces are not dereferencable [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
• Re: prov-o telecon today Stephan Zednik
• prov-o telecon today Timothy Lebo

Saturday, 12 May 2012

• Re: Proposal for restructuring PROV-DM into core+extensions Graham Klyne
• Re: Proposal for restructuring PROV-DM into core+extensions Jim McCusker
• Proposal for restructuring PROV-DM into core+extensions Graham Klyne
• Re: provenance of provenance Luc Moreau
• Re: provenance of provenance Kai Eckert

Friday, 11 May 2012

• Re: provenance of provenance Reza B'Far (Oracle)
• Re: provenance of provenance Timothy Lebo
• Re: provenance of provenance Graham Klyne

Thursday, 10 May 2012

• provenance of provenance Luc Moreau
• prov-wg meeting minutes 2012-05-10 Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] Timothy Lebo
• [owl changed] invalidatedAtTime and generatedAtTime now functional Timothy Lebo
• Review and next steps on PROV-CONSTRAINTS James Cheney
• Fwd: Re: A proposal for reorganizing PROV materials Luc Moreau
• Re: specialization/alternate in prov-dm Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: announcement email for prov specs Stephan Zednik

Wednesday, 9 May 2012

• Re: specialization/alternate in prov-dm Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] Stephan Zednik
• PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 10 May 2012 Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: specialization/alternate in prov-dm Jun Zhao
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) Luc Moreau
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: specialization/alternate in prov-dm Jim McCusker
• Re: specialization/alternate in prov-dm Jun Zhao
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) Jun Zhao
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] Jun Zhao
• Re: A proposal for reorganizing PROV materials Graham Klyne
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) Luc Moreau
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) Daniel Garijo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] Paul Groth

Tuesday, 8 May 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] Stephan Zednik
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] Timothy Lebo
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) Daniel Garijo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] Stephan Zednik
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) Luc Moreau
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) Timothy Lebo
• Re: Mini-mini comment on prov-dm Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] Timothy Lebo
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] Jun Zhao
• Re: A proposal for reorganizing PROV materials (was: Complexity/simplicty redux) Paul Groth
• Re: specialization/alternate in prov-dm Luc Moreau
• Re: A proposal for reorganizing PROV materials Graham Klyne
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) Paolo Missier
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) Luc Moreau
• Re: specialization/alternate in prov-dm Jim McCusker
• Re: specialization/alternate in prov-dm Luc Moreau
• Re: specialization/alternate in prov-dm Jim McCusker
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) Paolo Missier
• prov-dm: outstanding issues to close Luc Moreau
• PROV-ISSUE-362 (altOf-www): alternateOf is to handle levels of specificity, not the wild wild west of WWW URI selection [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• specialization/alternate in prov-dm Luc Moreau
• Re: A proposal for reorganizing PROV materials Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Daniel Garijo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-368 (no-responsibility-in-derivation): No responsibility in derivation [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) Daniel Garijo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] Luc Moreau
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: A proposal for reorganizing PROV materials Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-373: trim qualified from "3.2 expanded" [PROV-O HTML] Daniel Garijo
• A proposal for reorganizing PROV materials (was: Complexity/simplicty redux) Graham Klyne
• Re: Complexity/simplicty redux Graham Klyne
• Re: Mini-mini comment on prov-dm Ivan Herman
• prov-wg: Telcon Minutes May 3, 2012 Paul Groth
• new signatures for derivation relations Luc Moreau
• Re: [owl changed] PROV-ISSUE-372 (qualified-property-chains): ( prov:qualifedUsage prov:entity ) rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:used Ivan Herman

Monday, 7 May 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] Stephan Zednik
• Re: [owl changed] PROV-ISSUE-372 (qualified-property-chains): ( prov:qualifedUsage prov:entity ) rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:used Ivan Herman
• Re: [owl changed] PROV-ISSUE-372 (qualified-property-chains): ( prov:qualifedUsage prov:entity ) rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:used Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] Stephan Zednik
• Re: [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-372 (qualified-property-chains): ( prov:qualifedUsage prov:entity ) rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:used Ivan Herman
• [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-372 (qualified-property-chains): ( prov:qualifedUsage prov:entity ) rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:used Timothy Lebo
• Re: Mini-mini comment on prov-dm Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-366: Approving agent in a qualified wasRevisionOf [Ontology] Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-366: Approving agent in a qualified wasRevisionOf [Ontology] Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-366: Approving agent in a qualified wasRevisionOf [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Timothy Lebo
• Re: Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity Timothy Lebo
• Re: Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity Timothy Lebo
• Re: Mini-mini comment on prov-dm Ivan Herman
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) Timothy Lebo
• Re: prov-o telecon today Timothy Lebo
• Re: Mini-mini comment on prov-dm Paul Groth
• Mini-mini comment on prov-dm Ivan Herman
• Re: prov-o telecon today Jun Zhao
• PROV-ISSUE-373: trim qualified from "3.2 expanded" [PROV-O HTML] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Another prov-o comment/question Timothy Lebo
• prov-o telecon today Timothy Lebo
• PROV-ISSUE-372 (qualified-property-chains): ( prov:qualifedUsage prov:entity ) rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:used Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Question on permitted datatypes Ivan Herman
• Another prov-o comment/question Ivan Herman
• Minor editorial comment on Prov-o Ivan Herman
• Re: proposal separating collections Paul Groth
• RE: proposal separating collections Stephan Zednik

Sunday, 6 May 2012

• Re: Complexity/simplicty redux Paul Groth
• Complexity/simplicty redux Graham Klyne

Saturday, 5 May 2012

• Re: Fwd: provenance working group draft specs - ready for review Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] Paul Groth
• proposal separating collections Paul Groth
• Fwd: provenance working group draft specs - ready for review Paul Groth

Friday, 4 May 2012

• Re: announcement email for prov specs Paul Groth
• Re: announcement email for prov specs Satya Sahoo
• announcement email for prov specs Paul Groth
• Re: Revised PROV-AQ Olaf Hartig
• Re: Revised PROV-AQ Graham Klyne
• Re: Revised PROV-AQ Olaf Hartig

Thursday, 3 May 2012

• Re: Revised PROV-AQ Olaf Hartig
• Revised PROV-AQ Graham Klyne
• Re: scribe for today? Paul Groth
• Re: scribe for today? Daniel Garijo
• Re: scribe for today? Stian Soiland-Reyes
• scribe for today? Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-365 (membership-as-insertion-too-limitting): Collection constraint membership-as-insertion too limitting [prov-dm-constraints] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-340 (start-by-activity-is-comm): Start by Activity is Communication; drop it. [prov-dm] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: prov-wg: Telcon Agenda May 3, 2012 Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-204 (end-of-entity): What marks the end of an entity? [prov-dm] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-311 (clarify-optionals): Clarify optional arguments in DM [prov-dm] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-311 (clarify-optionals): Clarify optional arguments in DM [prov-dm] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity Jun Zhao
• Re: Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] Jun Zhao
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-370 (tracedTo-inference-only): Should tracedTo be moved to prov-constraints and be defined as a binary relation that can be inferred [prov-dm] Jun Zhao
• Re: [provo] Re: Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) Stian Soiland-Reyes
• [provo] Re: Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-368 (no-responsibility-in-derivation): No responsibility in derivation [prov-dm] Paolo Missier
• Re: prov-wg: Telcon Agenda May 3, 2012 Olaf Hartig

Wednesday, 2 May 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-338: explain prov:agent vs. prov:hadPlan naming convention [PROV-O HTML] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-338: explain prov:agent vs. prov:hadPlan naming convention [PROV-O HTML] Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-334 (define-qualification-pattern): Qualification Pattern was used, used in bold font in its first occurrence, but never defined. [PROV-O HTML] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: [owl changed] ISSUE-83: Express inverse relationships in Provenance Model as well as ontology Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-370 (tracedTo-inference-only): Should tracedTo be moved to prov-constraints and be defined as a binary relation that can be inferred [prov-dm] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-351 (membership-complete): memberOf complete attribute missing [prov-dm] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] Jun Zhao
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-369 (drop-startByActivity): Should we drop wasStartedByActivity? [prov-dm] Paul Groth
• prov-wg: Telcon Agenda May 3, 2012 Paul Groth

Tuesday, 1 May 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] Tim Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-369 (drop-startByActivity): Should we drop wasStartedByActivity? [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-369 (drop-startByActivity): Should we drop wasStartedByActivity? [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-368 (no-responsibility-in-derivation): No responsibility in derivation [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-267 (TLebo): annotate all subproperty axioms to justify them [Ontology] Khalid Belhajjame
• PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-368 (no-responsibility-in-derivation): No responsibility in derivation [prov-dm] Jun Zhao
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-369 (drop-startByActivity): Should we drop wasStartedByActivity? [prov-dm] Jun Zhao
• Re: Fwd: Going for simplicity (was: actions related to collections) Paul Groth
• Re: Fwd: Going for simplicity (was: actions related to collections) Graham Klyne

Last message date: Thursday, 31 May 2012 22:53:27 UTC