Tuesday, 31 January 2012
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-213 (prov-sem-events): Alignment of events in PROV-DM vs PROV-SEM [Formal Semantics]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-230 (Name-scoping): Name scoping in DM is wrong concept [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-229 (Refactor-and-sub-edit): Document would benefit from refactoring and editing [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-214 (prov-sem-event-activities): PROV-SEM: Linking events to activities [Formal Semantics]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-213 (prov-sem-events): Alignment of events in PROV-DM vs PROV-SEM [Formal Semantics]
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-230 (Name-scoping): Name scoping in DM is wrong concept [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-229 (Refactor-and-sub-edit): Document would benefit from refactoring and editing [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-229 (Refactor-and-sub-edit): Document would benefit from refactoring and editing [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-229 (Refactor-and-sub-edit): Document would benefit from refactoring and editing [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-229 (Refactor-and-sub-edit): Document would benefit from refactoring and editing [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-229 (Refactor-and-sub-edit): Document would benefit from refactoring and editing [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-213 (prov-sem-events): Alignment of events in PROV-DM vs PROV-SEM [Formal Semantics]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-230 (Name-scoping): Name scoping in DM is wrong concept [prov-dm]
- Re: Fwd: PROV-DM semantics
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-229 (Refactor-and-sub-edit): Document would benefit from refactoring and editing [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-214 (prov-sem-event-activities): PROV-SEM: Linking events to activities [Formal Semantics]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-213 (prov-sem-events): Alignment of events in PROV-DM vs PROV-SEM [Formal Semantics]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-214 (prov-sem-event-activities): PROV-SEM: Linking events to activities [Formal Semantics]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-214 (prov-sem-event-activities): PROV-SEM: Linking events to activities [Formal Semantics]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-213 (prov-sem-events): Alignment of events in PROV-DM vs PROV-SEM [Formal Semantics]
- Re: Fwd: PROV-DM semantics
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-230 (Name-scoping): Name scoping in DM is wrong concept [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-229 (Refactor-and-sub-edit): Document would benefit from refactoring and editing [prov-dm]
Monday, 30 January 2012
- Re: Fwd: PROV-DM semantics
- Dial-in information for PROV-WG F2F
- Fwd: PROV-DM semantics
- Prov-o telecon 30 Jan
- ISSUE 229 (was: Reviewing PROV-DM)
- Reviewing PROV-DM
- PROV-ISSUE-230 (Name-scoping): Name scoping in DM is wrong concept [prov-dm]
- PROV-ISSUE-229 (Refactor-and-sub-edit): Document would benefit from refactoring and editing [prov-dm]
Saturday, 28 January 2012
Friday, 27 January 2012
- Re: modeling macted's example
- Re: modeling macted's example
- modeling macted's example
- Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-225 (objects-in-universe-of-discourse): What are the objects in the universe of discourse? [prov-dm]
- draft schedule prov-wg f2f
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-225 (objects-in-universe-of-discourse): What are the objects in the universe of discourse? [prov-dm]
- Prov-wg: Minutes Jan. 26, 2012 Telcon
- Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
Thursday, 26 January 2012
- Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
- Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
- Outstanding issues on PROV-DM
- universe of discourse: summary of votes
- RE: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
- Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
- RE: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
- Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
- Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
- Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
- Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
- Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
- Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
- Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
- Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
- Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
- Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
- Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
- Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
Wednesday, 25 January 2012
- Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
- Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
- Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
- Re: Prov-wg: Agenda Jan 25, 2012 Telcon
- Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
- Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
- Re: Prov-wg: Agenda Jan 25, 2012 Telcon
- Re: Prov-wg: Agenda Jan 25, 2012 Telcon
- Prov-wg: Agenda Jan 25, 2012 Telcon
- Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
Tuesday, 24 January 2012
- Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
- Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
- Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
- Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-225 (objects-in-universe-of-discourse): What are the objects in the universe of discourse? [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-225 (objects-in-universe-of-discourse): What are the objects in the universe of discourse? [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-225 (objects-in-universe-of-discourse): What are the objects in the universe of discourse? [prov-dm]
Monday, 23 January 2012
- titan pad for prov-o telecon
- Simple provenance? (Was: domain of the qualifiedDelegation property?)(
- Re: PROV-O telcon (Jan 23)
- PROV-O telcon (Jan 23)
Friday, 20 January 2012
- PROV-ISSUE-228 (dgarijo): Prov-o & prov DM alignement [Ontology]
- PROV-ISSUE-227 (dgarijo): Diagrams are not consistent in prov-o html [Ontology]
- PROV-ISSUE-226 (dgarijo): domain of the qualifiedDelegation property? [Ontology]
- PROV-WG Minutes 19 January 2012
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-155 (prov-o-pre-fpwd): general comments on prov-o document [Formal Semantics]
- Re: ISSUE-24: Semantic document address "P and things used by P determine values of some of X's invariant properties (less strict)"
Thursday, 19 January 2012
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-225 (objects-in-universe-of-discourse): What are the objects in the universe of discourse? [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-225 (objects-in-universe-of-discourse): What are the objects in the universe of discourse? [prov-dm]
- PROV-ISSUE-225 (objects-in-universe-of-discourse): What are the objects in the universe of discourse? [prov-dm]
- PROV-ISSUE-224 (unified-prov-namespace): Can we use a single namespace for the PROV family of specs? [prov-dm]
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- RE: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- RE: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-221 (constraint-was-associated-with): What are the constraints for wasAssociatedWith and actedOnBehalfOf? [prov-dm]
- Re: we still need a scribe for today's call
- we still need a scribe for today's call
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- RE: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- RE: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-222 (used-objectproperty): Datatype property for used? [Ontology]
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-206: three proposals to vote on (deadline Jan 15th midnight GMT)
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- PROV-ISSUE-223 (definition-of-entity): What is the definition of entity [prov-dm]
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
Wednesday, 18 January 2012
- Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 19 Jan 2012
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-222 (used-objectproperty): Datatype property for used? [Ontology]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-222 (used-objectproperty): Datatype property for used? [Ontology]
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- RE: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- RE: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-222 (used-objectproperty): Datatype property for used? [Ontology]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model]
- PROV-ISSUE-222 (used-objectproperty): Datatype property for used? [Ontology]
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
Tuesday, 17 January 2012
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-96 (entities and roles): Relating Roled Entities with non-Roled Entities [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-96 (entities and roles): Relating Roled Entities with non-Roled Entities [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-189: Section 5.2.4 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-187: Section 5.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-216 (TLebo): qualified wasAttributedTo? [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-96 (entities and roles): Relating Roled Entities with non-Roled Entities [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-131 (YolandaGil): Simplify the references to "recipe" in Provenance Data Model (PROV-DM) Draft [Data Model]
- PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 19 Jan 2012
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-218: Clarification on the transitivity of Traceability Record [prov-dm]
- RE: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- RE: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- RE: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-206: three proposals to vote on (deadline Jan 15th midnight GMT)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-217 (account-asserter): What is the asserter of an account? [prov-dm]
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- PROV-O: Recipe changed to Plan
- Re: constraint subfigures
- PROV-ISSUE-221 (constraint-was-associated-with): What are the constraints for wasAssociatedWith and actedOnBehalfOf? [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-105: 5.3.1 Generation (current version of the conceptual model document) [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-105: 5.3.1 Generation (current version of the conceptual model document) [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-216 (TLebo): qualified wasAttributedTo? [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-216 (TLebo): qualified wasAttributedTo? [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-105: 5.3.1 Generation (current version of the conceptual model document) [Conceptual Model]
- PROV-ISSUE-220 (remove-summary): Remove wasSummaryOf relation [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-218: Clarification on the transitivity of Traceability Record [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-44 (shortcuts): Introduce widely used provenance concepts as shortcuts in the model [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-105: 5.3.1 Generation (current version of the conceptual model document) [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-44 (shortcuts): Introduce widely used provenance concepts as shortcuts in the model [Conceptual Model]
- PROV-ISSUE-219 (prov:label): label attribute is required in PROV [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-208 (TLebo): "5.4.2 Record Container" is misleading [prov-dm]
Monday, 16 January 2012
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-105: 5.3.1 Generation (current version of the conceptual model document) [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-209 (TLebo): broken anchor [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-218: Clarification on the transitivity of Traceability Record [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-218: Clarification on the transitivity of Traceability Record [prov-dm]
- PROV-ISSUE-218: Clarification on the transitivity of Traceability Record [prov-dm]
- PROV-ISSUE-217 (account-asserter): What is the asserter of an account? [prov-dm]
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: Towards PROV-O Accounts
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-216 (TLebo): qualified wasAttributedTo? [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-180 (TLebo): defaults to prov:steps="n" causes issue in PROV-O [prov-dm]
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-206: three proposals to vote on (deadline Jan 15th midnight GMT)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-206: three proposals to vote on (deadline Jan 15th midnight GMT)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-180 (TLebo): defaults to prov:steps="n" causes issue in PROV-O [prov-dm]
- PROV-WG: Minutes of the Jan. 12, 2012 telcon
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text: however... :-)
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text: however... :-)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-206: three proposals to vote on (deadline Jan 15th midnight GMT)
- PROV-O call Jan 16
Sunday, 15 January 2012
Saturday, 14 January 2012
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text: however... :-)
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text: however... :-)
Friday, 13 January 2012
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text: however... :-)
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text: however... :-)
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text: however... :-)
- Re: Prov-DM, entity records and ASN
- PROV-ISSUE-215 (ProvenanceOfW3CReport): An example to discuss identifiers [prov-dm]
Thursday, 12 January 2012
- Prov-DM, entity records and ASN
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-155 (prov-o-pre-fpwd): general comments on prov-o document [Formal Semantics]
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: ISSUE-24: Semantic document address "P and things used by P determine values of some of X's invariant properties (less strict)"
- PROV-ISSUE-214 (prov-sem-event-activities): PROV-SEM: Linking events to activities [Formal Semantics]
- PROV-ISSUE-213 (prov-sem-events): Alignment of events in PROV-DM vs PROV-SEM [Formal Semantics]
- PROV-ISSUE-212 (three-vs-two-levels): Shold we distinguish between things, entities and entity records in the semantics or just have entities and entity records [Formal Semantics]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-183 (prov-dm-identifiers): identifiers in prov-dm [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-O plan?
- Re: PROV-O plan?
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-124: Constraints on Used Relation (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-O plan?
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-204 (end-of-entity): What marks the end of an entity? [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-206: three proposals to vote on (deadline Jan 15th midnight GMT)
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-206: three proposals to vote on (deadline Jan 15th midnight GMT)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-191: Section 5.3.1.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-201: Section 8 (PROV-DM as on Dec 5) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-127: Constraint id= participation (PROV DM and PROV ontology) [Data Model]
- Re: Overview blog post
Wednesday, 11 January 2012
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-183 (prov-dm-identifiers): identifiers in prov-dm [prov-dm]
Thursday, 12 January 2012
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-206: three proposals to vote on (deadline Jan 15th midnight GMT)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-206: three proposals to vote on (deadline Jan 15th midnight GMT)
Wednesday, 11 January 2012
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-201: Section 8 (PROV-DM as on Dec 5) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-191: Section 5.3.1.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-127: Constraint id= participation (PROV DM and PROV ontology) [Data Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-125: derivation-attributes constraint (PROV-DM and PROV-O) [Data Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-126: Section 5.3.3.2 "Process Execution Independent Derivation Expression." [Data Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-126: Section 5.3.3.2 "Process Execution Independent Derivation Expression." [Data Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-125: derivation-attributes constraint (PROV-DM and PROV-O) [Data Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-121: Constraint on PE (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-50 (Ordering of Process): Defintion for Ordering of Process [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-100 (Entity definition): Section 5.2.1 Entity [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-124: Constraints on Used Relation (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-121: Constraint on PE (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model]
- Overview blog post
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-100 (Entity definition): Section 5.2.1 Entity [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-50 (Ordering of Process): Defintion for Ordering of Process [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-183 (prov-dm-identifiers): identifiers in prov-dm [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-183 (prov-dm-identifiers): identifiers in prov-dm [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-204 (end-of-entity): What marks the end of an entity? [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-203: Proposal to amend definition and usage of Plan in PROV-DM [prov-dm]
- PROV-ISSUE-206: three proposals to vote on (deadline Jan 15th midnight GMT)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-183 (prov-dm-identifiers): identifiers in prov-dm [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-210 (TLebo): 7.1 PROV-DM Interpretation diagram and interpretation definitions disorderly
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-178 (TLebo): wasStartedBy constraint between started and generated entity [prov-dm]
Tuesday, 10 January 2012
Monday, 9 January 2012
- confirming in-person attendance F2F2
- Re: PROV-AQ updates
- Re: PROV-AQ updates
- PROV-O plan?
- Re: PROV-AQ updates
- Re: PROV-O call on Jan 9
- Re: Formal semantics draft
- Re: PROV-AQ updates
- PROV-ISSUE-211 (Incremental-discovery-description): Possible revision to description of incremental discovery [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: Formal semantics draft
- PROV-O call on Jan 9
Saturday, 7 January 2012
Friday, 6 January 2012
- Re: prov-wg meeting minutes 2012-01-05
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: prov-wg meeting minutes 2012-01-05
- Re: PROV-O call summary
- PROV-AQ updates
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
Thursday, 5 January 2012
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-183 (prov-dm-identifiers): identifiers in prov-dm [prov-dm]
- prov-wg meeting minutes 2012-01-05
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: PROV-O call summary
- Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-178 (TLebo): wasStartedBy constraint between started and generated entity [prov-dm]
- PROV-ISSUE-210 (TLebo): 7.1 PROV-DM Interpretation diagram and interpretation definitions disorderly
- Re: Towards PROV-O Accounts
- Re: Towards PROV-O Accounts
- Re: Towards PROV-O Accounts
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-183 (prov-dm-identifiers): identifiers in prov-dm [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-57 (comment-on-ivp-of): comment on ivp of
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-113: wasScheduledAfter is transitive [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer]
- RE: viewOf / complementOf discussion in 201-12-15 telecon
- Re: Towards PROV-O Accounts
- Re: PROV-O call summary
- scribe required please, thanks
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-167 (TLebo): What is a "normal web resource"? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: Towards PROV-O Accounts
- Re: Towards PROV-O Accounts
- Re: PROV-O call summary
- Re: Towards PROV-O Accounts
- Re: Towards PROV-O Accounts
- Re: Towards PROV-O Accounts
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-184: Section 2.1.2 (PROV-DM version as on Nov 28th) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-184: Section 2.1.2 (PROV-DM version as on Nov 28th) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-O call summary
- Re: Towards PROV-O Accounts
- Re: PROV-O call summary
- Re: PROV-O call summary
- Towards PROV-O Accounts
- Re: PROV-O call summary
Wednesday, 4 January 2012
Tuesday, 3 January 2012
- PROV-ISSUE-209 (TLebo): broken anchor [prov-dm]
- PROV-ISSUE-208 (TLebo): "5.4.2 Record Container" is misleading [prov-dm]
- PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 5 Jan 2012
- Re: PROV-O telcon today
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-198: Section 6.1 (PROV-DM as on Dec 5) [prov-dm]
- Re: viewOf / complementOf discussion in 201-12-15 telecon
- Re: prov-dm - when are constructs too domain specific?
- Re: Formal semantics draft