encoding prov-constraints in prov-o

Hi All,

I just got back from a nice holiday and have been catching up on email.

One thing I wanted to comment on was the idea of encoding the
constraints in owl.

I'm happy for someone to do this but personally I think we should
treat it as "implementation" of the constraints - just like I will
implement the constraints as sparql.

In particular, I'm worried about the bandwidth of the group as a
whole. There are a number of documents that need to be done and we
also need to start the work of responding to comments for our core
documents.

I know there is a feeling in the group that this would be good to do
but I wanted to start a conversation about whether this should be done
here or not.

Thanks,
Paul




-- 
--
Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
Assistant Professor
- Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group |
  Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science
- The Network Institute
VU University Amsterdam

Received on Monday, 27 August 2012 16:07:37 UTC