- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:23:16 +0200
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Oops. For some reasons this was answered on Issue-474. For the sake of completeness and issue management, let me repeat my answer: That would lead to a possible confusion. The term 'dataset' is used in the SW world, namely in SPARQL. It *may* be the term adopted by RDF 1.1 for a collection of named graphs and, actually, it *may* be the right abstraction for Prov, too, but... we are not yet sure. And if we end up using the same term but with a different meaning then, well, hell is loose:-) B.t.w., if I use the RDF datasets as an analogy: that consists of (G, (n1,G1),....,(ni,Gi)), where (ni,Gi) is, to use the current terminology, a named graph (that is the term used in SPARQL) and G is the 'default graph'. As an analogy, what about 'default bundle' ? Ivan On Aug 10, 2012, at 09:57 , Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-477 (rename toplevel-bundle): rename toplevel-bundle to dataset [prov-n] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/477 > > Raised by: Luc Moreau > On product: prov-n > > > Following discussion on ISSUE-474, let us rename toplevel-bundle to dataset. > > Hence, what was written > > bundle > prefix ex <http://ex.com> > entity(ex:a) > //... > endBundle > > would become > > > dataset > prefix ex <http://ex.com> > entity(ex:a) > //... > endDataset > > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Friday, 10 August 2012 11:23:45 UTC