- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 11:33:47 +0100
- To: Carl Reed <creed@opengeospatial.org>
- CC: martin <martin@ics.forth.gr>, public-prov-wg@w3.org
I think the notion of location should be as generic as possible. To this end, I'd like to pose an additional example, which comes from a real scenario I've worked with, which suggests possible further uses of location provenance. I raise this because I think it's important that whatever definition we adopt for location does not rule out using the information suggested by this use case as part of a record of provenance information. ... Researcher H is investigating genomics in Drosophila (fruit flies), specifically genetic factors affecting spermatogenesis that may cause sterility. To this end, she creates in situ hybridization (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_situ_hybridization) images of Drosophila testes. Location information arises in a number of different ways: (1) starting from a microscopic image of testes treated to reveal gene expression, the researcher looks for occurrences of interesting and clearly exposed gene expression patterns. These occurrences are recorded as a slide number and a coordinate location within the slide image. (2) the spatial location of the gene expression within the testis structure gives a direct visual indication of the sperm development stage at which a target gene is being expressed. This location is observed and recorded as a keyword from a controlled vocabulary that relates the gene expression to a developmental stage. As well as creating microscopic images, the tissue samples are subjected to a real-time PCR process (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymerase_chain_reaction) that gives a quantitative indication of the levels of a particular gene expression product present in a sample. PCR is a batch process, where preparations based on different samples (targetting different genes, or different Drosophila species) are placed into different wells in a tray. This leads to: (3) The PCR analyzer presents by reference to the location of the various wells (identified by label or row/column position). The well locations are in turn linked to details of the sample that has been placed in that well. Of these examples, I think that (1) and (3) are definitely part of the provenance information for a result. (2) is less clear, and I'd judge it to be part of the data rather than provenance information. But researcher H has also performed some follow-on research to analyzes particular spatial patterns of gene expression, in which the location-based developmental stage might conceivably be considered to be provenance information, in the sense of where the phenomenon was observed to occur. #g -- Carl Reed wrote: > > Martin - > > A shorter version as defined in ISO 19112 and used by the OGC (since > this was a jointly developed definition) is: > > Location: Identifiable geographic place [ISO 19112]. Typically a > location is a physically fixed point, typically on the surface of the > Earth, though locations can be relative to other, non-earth centric > coordinate reference systems. > > I also noticed that the the European INSPIRE community working on > cultural heritage sites are using CIDOC/21127 as well as additional OGC > references, such as the URN syntax for spatial reference systems. > > Suffice to say, the definition for location in 21127 is a community > elaboration of the more general OGC/ISO definition. We may need some > such additional clarification for the provenance work - such as dealing > with data provenance for articles, maps, charts, etc for the moon, Mars, > and so forth. > > Regards > > Carl
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2011 10:36:20 UTC