Re: Definitions and provenance and invariance

Good suggestion, Stian, thanks!
Luc

On 06/21/2011 11:07 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 17:06, Luc Moreau<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>  wrote:
>    
>> Following comments, I have tried to simplify the definitions of 'thing' and
>> 'IVP of'  further.
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ConceptInvariantViewOnThing#Further_simplification
>>      
> +1 with the qualification of correspondence, for instance:
>
> The asserter is free to choose what "corresponding properties" above
> means. The corresponding properties might match many-to-many, eg.
> rectangle A may have varying length and width, whereas B, an IVP of A,
> may have a invariant area.
>
>
>
>    

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm

Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2011 10:39:19 UTC