- From: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:45:02 +0200
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi All: In trying to move towards a definition of process execution, it would be good to get the groups consensus on the notion of process execution being in the past. Namely, the following is proposed from the last telecon: "A process execution has either completed (occurred in the past) or is occurring in present (partially complete). In other words, the start of a process execution is always in the past." Can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for this proposal via a response to this email message? The due date for responses is this Thursday before the telecon. Thanks, Paul
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2011 10:45:36 UTC