Re: PROV-ISSUE-2: proposal to vote on - process execution duration

• From: Pignotti, E. <e.pignotti@abdn.ac.uk>
• Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:27:40 +0100
• To: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <CA17AFD8.5015%e.pignotti@abdn.ac.uk>

+1

Edoardo

On 09/06/2011 21:27, "Paul Groth" <pgroth@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hi All,
>
>In the telecon today we almost reached consensus around the following
>proposal:
>
>"A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval"
>
>However, there were concerns that this meant that it required all
>process executions to specify a duration.
>
>I would like to suggest a reformulation of the proposal as follows:
>
>"A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval.
>Statements denoting this duration are optional."
>
>In order to make progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for
>this proposal?
>
>Thanks,
>Paul
>



The University of Aberdeen is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013683..

Received on Friday, 10 June 2011 10:29:54 UTC