- From: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:18:46 -0600
- To: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
+1 -- Stephan On Jun 9, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Paul Groth wrote: > Hi All, > > In the telecon today we almost reached consensus around the following proposal: > > "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval" > > However, there were concerns that this meant that it required all process executions to specify a duration. > > I would like to suggest a reformulation of the proposal as follows: > > "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval. Statements denoting this duration are optional." > > In order to make progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for > this proposal? > > Thanks, > Paul > >
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2011 22:19:15 UTC