- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:59:08 +0000
- To: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>
- CC: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>, Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi satya, It's just meant to be a single place for all terms we propose for concepts, not their definition. Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Southampton SO17 1BJ United Kingdom On 9 Jun 2011, at 17:56, "Satya Sahoo" <satya.sahoo@case.edu<mailto:satya.sahoo@case.edu>> wrote: Hi Luc, Will the definitions on this page be distinct from those on <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ConceptProcessExecution> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ConceptProcessExecution? Thanks. Best, Satya On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Luc Moreau <<mailto:L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk<mailto:L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>> wrote: A page to list terms: <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/TerminologyProposals>http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/TerminologyProposals Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Southampton SO17 1BJ United Kingdom On 9 Jun 2011, at 17:37, "Paul Groth" <<mailto:pgroth@gmail.com>pgroth@gmail.com<mailto:pgroth@gmail.com>> wrote: > Hi Graham, > > I had proposed the term "snapshot" for IVPT on another thread. > > I don't know what you/others thing of that. > > cheers, > Paul > > Daniel Garijo wrote: >> I totally agree with you. >> Best, >> Daniel >> >> 2011/6/9 Graham Klyne <<mailto:GK@ninebynine.org>GK@ninebynine.org<mailto:GK@ninebynine.org> <mailto:<mailto:GK@ninebynine.org>GK@ninebynine.org<mailto:GK@ninebynine.org>>> >> >> While I live with the term IVPT as a way to allow us to move our >> discussions forward, I think it would be horrible if it actually >> ended up in any of the documents we produce. >> >> I'm not asking for any change now, just giving notice that I >> expect us to settle on a better term when we can see better what >> we're talking about and what we actually need to say. >> >> #g >> -- >> >> Jun Zhao wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> To bootstrap the development of the model task force, Satya, >> Paolo, Khalid and I put together a document [1] highlighting >> issues and goals to focus on during the F2F1. >> >> The document is not meant to be definitive. It should be >> updated and evolved as discussions raised in the mailing list. >> We hope this document could help with setting expectation for >> the F2F1 and guidance on the near focus of the WG. >> >> [1] <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/F2F1_Model_Proposal> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/F2F1_Model_Proposal >> >> Best regards, >> >> Jun >> >> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2011 17:00:30 UTC