- From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:13:38 +0200
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>, public-prov-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <BANLkTi=JB2mnS24UqvG0UgXwxvoUC7mMJw@mail.gmail.com>
HI Luc, I don't beieve that we should model it on specific domains. I would leave the core vocabulary as generic as possible, providing examples/guidelines on how to extend it on different domains (although that last activity looks more like a task for the Implementation and test cases task force). Also, does the conceptual provenance tracking apply for the news example? Would it be like tracking the provenance of a rumour or an idea? I remember that in the last telecon I thought that it made sense to record it, but now I'm not that sure when I look to real use cases. Best, Daniel 2011/6/8 Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> > > Hi all, > > Having identified a concept of Invariant View or Perspective on Thing > (IVPT), I'd like to go back > to the meaning of Derivation. > > Several of you indicated that Derivation expresses that one IVPT was > influenced by another IVPT. > > Paolo has asked what does it mean to 'influence'? It's a good question! > > Will we be able to define a notion of influence that applies for all > things, > whether physical, digital, conceptual, or other? Should we go down the > road of > modelling influence in specific domains? > > Regards, > Luc > > > > > On 27/05/11 20:34, Stephan Zednik wrote: > > > On May 27, 2011, at 5:04 AM, Daniel Garijo wrote: > > Hi Luc, all > In the example c2 is also a derivation of d2, and from my point of view, > c2 could also be seen as a derivation from c1, since it is the chart taken > as reference > and corected in c2... > > As for your second question, I think that if we want to be able to cover > provenance from resources, resources representations and resources state > representation, a derivation must be able to refer to all of them. > > What do you think? > > > From the existing example/scenario section on Derivation: > > A derivation is a relation between two Resource State Representations > that expresses that one RSR was influenced by the other RSR. > > A agree that a derivation should be a relation between two like resource > abstractions, and I agree with Daniel in that I am not sure we should limit > it to RSR. I believe one Resource could be derived from another Resource, > and same with Resource State. I also believe derivation covers a large > spectrum of relationships - FRBR has covered some of this ground on the wide > spectrum of different types of derivation so thankfully we do not have to > start from scratch. Stories can be derived from other stores, editions of > publications are derived from earlier editions, adaptions are derived works, > translations are derived expressions, etc. > > I suggest an quick overview of FRBR's conclusions on derivations to > provide direction. > > I also agree with the suggestion that Version be a specialization / > subtype of Derivation, as suggested in the Version section of the existing > example/scenario. > > --Stephan > > Best, > Daniel > > 2011/5/27 Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> > >> >> Dear all, >> >> Over the last week, we debated the notion of resource (PROV-ISSUE-1), >> one of the concepts identified in the charter as core to a provenance >> data model. It would be good to discuss the notion of derivation. >> >> Do we agree with the illustration of derivation [1]: >> in the example, chart c1 is a derivation of data set d1. >> Are there other interesting illustrations? >> >> Is derivation relating resources/resource representations/resource >> representation states? >> >> Cheers, >> Luc >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/CharterConceptsIllustration >> >> >> >> >> >> On 05/20/2011 08:07 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> >>> PROV-ISSUE-7 (define-derivation): Definition for Concept 'Derivation' >>> [Provenance Terminology] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/7 >>> >>> Raised by: Luc Moreau >>> On product: Provenance Terminology >>> >>> The Provenance WG charter identifies the concept 'Derivation' as a core >>> concept of the provenance interchange language to be standardized (see >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/01/prov-wg-charter). >>> >>> What term do we adopt for the concept 'Derivation'? >>> How do we define the concept 'Derivation'? >>> Where does concept 'Derivation' appear in ProvenanceExample? >>> Which provenance query requires the concept 'Derivation'? >>> >>> Wiki page: http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ConceptDerivation >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Professor Luc Moreau >> Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 >> University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 >> Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk >> United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm >> >> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2011 09:14:06 UTC