- From: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 19:06:03 +0100
- To: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- CC: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Jun, > I guess the reason you propose to name "agent" as "controller" is that > you define agent has a controlling role in the executions. But to me, > an agent might have a more relaxed role. It might just perform, > participate etc the execution, without necessarily having a very > strong controlling effect. You are right in the sense that I am relying mostly on the journalism example. As far as I can tell, "agents" in the example "control" "process executions". That is to say that I agree, "controller" may not be the perfect term if we want to cater for roles such as "participate", "observe", etc. Thanks, khalid > > cheers, > > Jun > > On 06/06/11 19:38, Khalid Belhajjame wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I added a definition of the concept "agent". >> >> Definition: An agent is a (physical or digital) entity that controls one >> or multiple process executions >> >> - The newspaper, the blogger and the government portal are examples of >> agents >> >> I would prefer to use the term “controller” instead of “agent”. To me, >> the term “agent” is a bit vague. >> >> Thanks, khalid >> >> On 20/05/2011 08:04, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >>> PROV-ISSUE-4 (define-agent): Definition for Concept 'Agent' >>> [Provenance Terminology] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/4 >>> >>> Raised by: Luc Moreau >>> On product: Provenance Terminology >>> >>> The Provenance WG charter identifies the concept 'Agent' as a core >>> concept of the provenance interchange language to be standardized >>> (see http://www.w3.org/2011/01/prov-wg-charter). >>> >>> What term do we adopt for the concept 'Agent'? >>> How do we define the concept 'Agent'? >>> Where does concept 'Agent' appear in ProvenanceExample? >>> Which provenance query requires the concept 'Agent'? >>> >>> Wiki page: http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ConceptAgent >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2011 18:06:34 UTC