- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:29:39 +0100
- To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi all, Given that we have a busy agenda on Thursday, we may not have time to discuss issues related to the model. There is some commonality in the definitions of Process Execution [1]. Hence, before putting the following proposal to a formal vote, I would like to get a feel as to whether the proposal would get support, or whether it needs to be amended. PROPOSED: 1. there is a distinction between process execution and process specification/definition 2. process specification/definition is referred to as recipe in the charter and is out of scope for this WG 3. terminology needs to be agreed on [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ConceptProcessExecution Regards, Luc -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2011 08:30:08 UTC