- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 17:36:32 +0000
- To: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Begin forwarded message: From: Yolanda Gil <gil@isi.edu<mailto:gil@isi.edu>> Date: 6 June 2011 17:33:43 GMT+01:00 To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk<mailto:L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: PROV-ISSUE-1: a proposal to vote on +1 Thanks! On Jun 6, 2011, at 9:11 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: You can send your vote And I wl forward it. I sent again a reminder to Sandro. Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Southampton SO17 1BJ United Kingdom On 6 Jun 2011, at 17:05, "Yolanda Gil" <gil@isi.edu<mailto:gil@isi.edu><mailto:gil@isi.edu>> wrote: Thanks for alerting me Luc. No, I am not in the list, I just emailed Sandro again... I am not sure I can vote, I will try. Thanks! Yolanda Gil, USC/ISI +1-310-448-8794 On Jun 6, 2011, at 7:42 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: Hi Yolanda, ... as you're not on the list, yet Luc -------- Original Message -------- Subject: PROV-ISSUE-1: a proposal to vote on Resent-Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:24:05 +0000 Resent-From: <<mailto:public-prov-wg@w3.org>public-prov-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-prov-wg@w3.org><mailto:public-prov-wg@w3.org>> Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:22:30 +0100 From: Luc Moreau <<mailto:L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk<mailto:L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk><mailto:L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>> To: Provenance Working Group WG <<mailto:public-prov-wg@w3.org>public-prov-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-prov-wg@w3.org><mailto:public-prov-wg@w3.org>> Dear all, You will recall we failed to reach consensus on the following proposal at the last teleconference: "in a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us to express the provenance of a thing that does not change". Kai, Jim and Satya then expressed concerns, which can be summarized as, this proposal provides no route to handle mutable things. After a long email discussion with them over the WE, we have converged towards a better proposal: In a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us to express the provenance of an invariant view or perspective on a thing. What is important to note is that it is the view/perspective that does not change, the thing itself can be mutable. To allow us to progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for this proposal? Best regards, Luc -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: <mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk<mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk><mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> United Kingdom <http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/%7Elavm> <http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm> http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Monday, 6 June 2011 17:37:25 UTC