PROV-ISSUE-42 (derivation-agent): Derivation should specifically mention agent in its definition [Conceptual Model] from Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker on 2011-07-23 (public-prov-wg@w3.org from July 2011)

From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 15:36:12 +0000
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QkeFQ-0007gw-Ee@stu.w3.org>

PROV-ISSUE-42 (derivation-agent): Derivation should specifically mention agent in its definition [Conceptual Model]

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/42

Raised by: Paul Groth
On product: Conceptual Model

Given that isDerivedFrom is between Bobs this by definition allows it to relate agents, it would nice for informative to mention this in the definition.

For example, I would like to say that isDerivedFrom(e0, David) this is fine with the current definition but might not be clear. 

Suggested resolution:

Add the following statement: "Note, that isDerivedFrom can also include agents. For example,  isDerivedFrom(e0, David).

Received on Saturday, 23 July 2011 15:36:17 UTC