- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 22:51:16 +0100
- To: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- CC: public-prov-wg@w3.org
-1 Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi Khalid, > > As far as I know, they are *not* interchangeable. One is the language > construct, the other is "in the world". > > cf. definition: > > A BOB represents an identifiable characterized entity. > > Should we go for "Characterized Entity", we need a typographic > convention to distinguish between > the construct and the world-thing, otherwise, the reader will never know > whether this is language construct > or not. > > > Luc > > On 21/07/2011 19:45, Khalid Belhajjame wrote: >> >> In the Provenance Model initial draft, the terms "Bob" and >> "characterized entity" are used interchangeably. >> Characterized entity seems then to be a candidate for replacing BOB. >> >> Thanks, khalid >> >> On 21/07/2011 19:30, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >>> PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/30 >>> >>> Raised by: Luc Moreau >>> On product: Conceptual Model >>> >>> How do we call the construct referred to as BOB. "BOB" was introduced as a placeholder at F2F1. Before F2F1, we use to refer to it as thing. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>
Received on Thursday, 21 July 2011 21:59:56 UTC