public-prov-wg@w3.org from July 2011 by date

Sunday, 31 July 2011

irc/zakim nick name Paul Groth
Re: prov-wg mercurial error Luc Moreau

Saturday, 30 July 2011

Re: prov-wg mercurial error Timothy Lebo
prov-wg mercurial error Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-67 (single-execution): Why is there a difference in what is represented by one vs multiple executions? [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame

Friday, 29 July 2011

PROV-ISSUE-67 (single-execution): Why is there a difference in what is represented by one vs multiple executions? [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-66 (is-execution-a-bob): Why is process execution not defined as a characterised entity? [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-65 (domain-specific-info): How is domain specific data combined with the generic model [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-46 (where-is-D-in-provenance): Where do I find document D in provenance [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Simon Miles
Re: PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-60: comments on bob [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
resolution about pil:Entity/pil:BOB Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-56 (derivation-definition-does-not-imply-transitivity): Derivation as defined is not transitive [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-62 (about-prov-language): about provenance language [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: Review of provenance model draft Luc Moreau
PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-63 (about the example): about the example [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-62 (about-prov-language): about provenance language [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-61 (is-revision-necessary): is revision necessary? [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-60: comments on bob [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-59 (generation-definition): on generation [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-58 (time-iso8601): is reference to iso8601 appropriate? [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-57 (comment-on-ivp-of): comment on ivp of Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-56 (derivation-definition-does-not-imply-transitivity): Derivation as defined is not transitive [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-53 (sparql-query-is-overkill): can't we have a lighter method to retrieve provenance-uri, given a document uri? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne
PROV-ISSUE-55 (are-provenance-uris-needed): Are provenance URIs really needed [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-54 (which-provenance-is-expected-to-be-retrieved?): What is it we expect to obtain when we say "retrieving the provenance of something" [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-53 (sparql-query-is-overkill): can't we have a lighter method to retrieve provenance-uri, given a document uri? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-52 (provenance-source-equal-treatment): why handling provider and third parties differently? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-53 (sparql-query-is-overkill): can't we have a lighter method to retrieve provenance-uri, given a document uri? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Reza B'far

Thursday, 28 July 2011

Wednesday, 27 July 2011

Re: W3C Privacy Interest Group Carl Reed
Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-49 (Participation): Suggested definition for Participation [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier
Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Satya Sahoo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Satya Sahoo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-49 (Participation): Suggested definition for Participation [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-33: Section 3.1 and Section 3.2: example of IVPof [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-45: isDerivedFrom and IVPof are transitive. [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-40 (recommended-roles): Roles should not be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
RE: PROV-ISSUE-49 (Participation): Suggested definition for Participation [Conceptual Model] Myers, Jim
Re: PROV-ISSUE-49 (Participation): Suggested definition for Participation [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-39 (generation-identifiable-activity): Generation should be defined as an identifable activity [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-39 (generation-identifiable-activity): Generation should be defined as an identifable activity [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-50 (Ordering of Process): Defintion for Ordering of Process [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-39 (generation-identifiable-activity): Generation should be defined as an identifable activity [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-50 (Ordering of Process): Defintion for Ordering of Process [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-39 (generation-identifiable-activity): Generation should be defined as an identifable activity [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame
relation <--> property Paolo Missier
Re: PROV-ISSUE-49 (Participation): Suggested definition for Participation [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier
Re: PROV-ISSUE-48 (Provenance Concept: Revision): Revision should be a class and not a property [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier
Re: PROV-ISSUE-49 (Participation): Suggested definition for Participation [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-39 (generation-identifiable-activity): Generation should be defined as an identifable activity [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-49 (Participation): Suggested definition for Participation [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-50 (Ordering of Process): Defintion for Ordering of Process [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-49 (Participation): Suggested definition for Participation [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-50 (Ordering of Process): Defintion for Ordering of Process [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-49 (Participation): Suggested definition for Participation [Conceptual Model] Stephan Zednik
Provenance Model (ontology and formal model documentation) Satya Sahoo
PROV-ISSUE-50 (Ordering of Process): Defintion for Ordering of Process [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-49 (Participation): Suggested definition for Participation [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-39 (generation-identifiable-activity): Generation should be defined as an identifable activity [Conceptual Model] Satya Sahoo
PROV-ISSUE-48 (Provenance Concept: Revision): Revision should be a class and not a property [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

Tuesday, 26 July 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Satya Sahoo
Prov WG Telecon Agenda 28 July 2011 Luc Moreau
Re: W3C Privacy Interest Group runnegar@isoc.org
Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Satya Sahoo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Satya Sahoo

Monday, 25 July 2011

Re: W3C Privacy Interest Group Carl Reed
Re: Identity and a thing Ryan Golden
Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Ryan Golden
Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Ryan Golden
RE: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] Myers, Jim
Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-32: Bob definition [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-40 (recommended-roles): Roles should not be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne
Re: blimey! is it just me or someone just kicked the W3C mail server? Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-46 (where-is-D-in-provenance): Where do I find document D in provenance [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Ryan Golden
Re: PROV-ISSUE-45: isDerivedFrom and IVPof are transitive. [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier
RE: PROV-ISSUE-32: Bob definition [Conceptual Model] Myers, Jim
Re: PROV-ISSUE-32: Bob definition [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
RE: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Myers, Jim
Re: PROV-ISSUE-32: Bob definition [Conceptual Model] Jim McCusker
Identity and a thing runnegar@isoc.org
Re: PROV-ISSUE-33: Section 3.1 and Section 3.2: example of IVPof [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-45: isDerivedFrom and IVPof are transitive. [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-42 (derivation-agent): Derivation should specifically mention agent in its definition [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
OECD Paper runnegar@isoc.org

Tuesday, 19 July 2011

W3C Privacy Interest Group runnegar@isoc.org

Monday, 25 July 2011

Sunday, 24 July 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Reza B'Far
Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Reza B'Far
Re: PROV-ISSUE-38: Section 3.4: Third party services are SPARQL endpoints [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Jim McCusker
RE: PROV-ISSUE-34: Section 4: definition of "Agent" Myers, Jim
RE: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Myers, Jim
RE: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Myers, Jim
Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame
PROV-ISSUE-45: isDerivedFrom and IVPof are transitive. [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-38: Section 3.4: Third party services are SPARQL endpoints [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-36: Section 3.2: Accessing the provenance of HTML documents [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-34: Section 4: definition of "Agent" Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-36: Section 3.2: Accessing the provenance of HTML documents [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-38: Section 3.4: Third party services are SPARQL endpoints [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-37: Section 3.3 and Section 3.4: on provenance information specified by third-parties [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Daniel Garijo

Saturday, 23 July 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Stephan Zednik
PROV-ISSUE-44 (shortcuts): Introduce widely used provenance concepts as shortcuts in the model [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-42 (derivation-agent): Derivation should specifically mention agent in its definition [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

Friday, 22 July 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Curt Tilmes

Saturday, 23 July 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-34: Section 4: definition of "Agent" Paul Groth
PROV-ISSUE-41 (distinct-roles): Distinct roles should be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-40 (recommended-roles): Roles should not be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-39 (generation-identifiable-activity): Generation should be defined as an identifable activity [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

Friday, 22 July 2011

PROV-ISSUE-38: Section 3.4: Third party services are SPARQL endpoints [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-37: Section 3.3 and Section 3.4: on provenance information specified by third-parties [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-36: Section 3.2: Accessing the provenance of HTML documents [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame

Thursday, 21 July 2011

Provenance Model draft document Luc Moreau
irc handle Luc Moreau
Re: Formal semantics notes James Cheney
Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-ISSUE-32: Bob definition [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne
Re: Formal semantics notes Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Jim McCusker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-32: Bob definition [Conceptual Model] Jim McCusker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] Jim McCusker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Jim McCusker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier
Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-34: Section 4: definition of "Agent" Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-32: Bob definition [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
PROV-ISSUE-33: Section 3.1 and Section 3.2: example of IVPof [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-32: Bob definition [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame
PROV-ISSUE-31 (standard-names): what names do we use to refer to the language, ontology, and access/query methods [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
implementation task force plan and telco Deus, Helena
Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Luc Moreau
Access control for "Implementation Stakeholder Questionnaire Response Report" Sandro Hawke
Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Jim McCusker
Formal semantics notes James Cheney
PAQ draft in W3C repository Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Graham Klyne
Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Graham Klyne
Planning page for generating the 2nd iteration of the Implementation Stakeholder questionnaire Stephan Zednik
Apologies for not attending tomorrow's meeting... Eric Stephan
Status of Plan for Report on Results of Implementation Stakeholders Questionnaire Stephan Zednik

Wednesday, 20 July 2011

Prov WG Telecon Agenda 21 July 2011 Luc Moreau
long list of actions Luc Moreau

Tuesday, 19 July 2011

Re: Agent Sub-Types Paul Groth
Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Myers, Jim

Monday, 18 July 2011

Re: Agent Sub-Types Paolo Missier
Re: Agent Sub-Types Reza B'Far
Re: Agent Sub-Types Paolo Missier

Sunday, 17 July 2011

Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Reza B'Far

Saturday, 16 July 2011

RE: [Spam:***** SpamScore] Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Myers, Jim
Re: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Reza B'Far
Re: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Khalid Belhajjame
Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Reza B'Far
Re: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Reza B'Far
RE: Bobs, IVP and time intervals Myers, Jim
RE: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Myers, Jim
Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Khalid Belhajjame
Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Khalid Belhajjame
Re: Bobs, IVP and time intervals Khalid Belhajjame
Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Ryan Golden
Blog post on F2F Paul Groth
Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Ryan Golden
Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Reza B'Far

Friday, 15 July 2011

RE: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Myers, Jim
RE: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Myers, Jim
Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Reza B'Far
Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Jim McCusker
RE: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Myers, Jim
Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Jim McCusker
RE: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Myers, Jim
Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Luc Moreau
Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Luc Moreau
Re: Agent terminology Paul Groth
RE: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Deus, Helena
simon:ivpOf Ryan Golden
Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Stephan Zednik
Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Reza B'Far
simon:entity (or Identifiable) Ryan Golden

Thursday, 14 July 2011

Agent terminology (was: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes?) Graham Klyne
Re: Agent Sub-Types Graham Klyne
Re: Fwd: Fwd: Discontinuing UK and FR dial-in numbers for Zakim Graham Klyne
Re: Agent Sub-Types Reza B'Far
Re: Agent Sub-Types Daniel Garijo
FW: the nature of a bob (was Re: Models and their use) Myers, Jim
re: IVPof proposal (was Re: Models and their use) Myers, Jim
Re: Agent Sub-Types Reza B'Far
Re: Agent Sub-Types Satya Sahoo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Reza B'Far
Re: Agent Sub-Types Reza B'Far
Re: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Satya Sahoo
Re: Agent Sub-Types Yolanda Gil
Agent Sub-Types Reza B'Far
Re: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Reza B'Far
Re: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Satya Sahoo
RE: Bobs, IVP and time intervals Myers, Jim
RE: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Deus, Helena
Re: Proposed changes to Process Execution and related concepts Luc Moreau
Fwd: Fwd: Discontinuing UK and FR dial-in numbers for Zakim Paolo Missier
Re: Bobs, IVP and time intervals Stephan Zednik
PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Luc Moreau
Re: Bobs, IVP and time intervals Luc Moreau
Re: Bobs, IVP and time intervals Stephan Zednik
Re: Connection to semantic news group Simon Miles
Bobs, IVP and time intervals Cresswell, Stephen
Re: Connection to semantic news group Eric Stephan
Re: Models and their use Luc Moreau
Connection to semantic news group Simon Miles
Re: Connection Task Force Informal Report Outline Eric Stephan
Re: Models and their use Simon Miles
Re: Connection Task Force Informal Report Outline Kai Eckert
Re: Models and their use Paul Groth
Re: Models and their use Graham Klyne

Wednesday, 13 July 2011

Re: Proposed changes to Process Execution and related concepts Reza B'Far
RE: Models and their use Myers, Jim
Re: Models and their use Simon Miles
Prov WG Telecon Agenda 14 July 2011 Paul Groth
RE: Models and their use Myers, Jim
Re: Models and their use Simon Miles
Re: Proposed changes to Process Execution and related concepts Graham Klyne
Re: Connection Task Force Informal Report Outline Yolanda Gil

Tuesday, 12 July 2011

Re: Proposed changes to Process Execution and related concepts Reza B'Far
Re: Proposed changes to Process Execution and related concepts Graham Klyne
Re: Access plan for next 3 months Paul Groth
Re: Models and their use Jim McCusker
Re: Proposed changes to Process Execution and related concepts Ryan Golden
Re: Models and their use Graham Klyne
Models and their use Simon Miles
Re: Proposed changes to Process Execution and related concepts Graham Klyne
Re: Access plan for next 3 months Graham Klyne
Access plan for next 3 months Simon Miles

Monday, 11 July 2011

Re: who is who? Paul Groth
change in my email Paul Groth

Tuesday, 12 July 2011

Simplicity (was: Regarding the definition of IVP OF) Graham Klyne
Re: Provenance Access Query example Graham Klyne
Proposed changes to Process Execution and related concepts Ryan Golden

Monday, 11 July 2011

Re: Consolidated Concepts page Luc Moreau
Re: Regarding the definition of IVP OF Paolo Missier
Re: ISSUE-28: We need a mechanism to assert two entity states refer to the same entity Paolo Missier
Re: Consolidated Concepts page Paolo Missier
Re: who is who? Paolo Missier
Re: who is who? Simon Miles
who is who? Luc Moreau
Re: Provenance Access Query example Luc Moreau
Re: Regarding the definition of IVP OF Luc Moreau
PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: ISSUE-28: We need a mechanism to assert two entity states refer to the same entity Luc Moreau
Re: Regarding the definition of IVP OF Luc Moreau

Sunday, 10 July 2011

Homework for Connection Task Force and Interested Parties! ericphb@gmail.com
Re: Consolidated Concepts page Luc Moreau

Saturday, 9 July 2011

Re: Connection Task Force Informal Report Outline Eric Stephan
Re: Provenance Access Query example Timothy Lebo
Re: Consolidated Concepts page Timothy Lebo
Re: Connection Task Force Informal Report Outline Timothy Lebo

Friday, 8 July 2011

RE: Regarding the definition of IVP OF Myers, Jim
RE: Regarding the definition of IVP OF Cresswell, Stephen
Regarding the definition of IVP OF Khalid Belhajjame
Re: ISSUE-28: We need a mechanism to assert two entity states refer to the same entity Graham Klyne
data transformations named by Ontology for Biomedical Investigations Timothy Lebo

Thursday, 7 July 2011

f2f1 whiteboard image Sandro Hawke
Re: ISSUE-28: We need a mechanism to assert two entity states refer to the same entity Paul Groth
RE: ISSUE-28: We need a mechanism to assert two entity states refer to the same entity Myers, Jim
Re: Provenance Access Query example Timothy Lebo
Provenance Access Query example Timothy Lebo
ISSUE-28: We need a mechanism to assert two entity states refer to the same entity Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-27: Consider ordering of event in model and semantics Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-26 (uses and generates questions): How can one figure out the provenance of a given entity? Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Connection Task Force Informal Report Outline Eric Stephan
Connection Task Force Informal Report Outline Eric Stephan

Wednesday, 6 July 2011

ISSUE-25: Semantics group to incorporate ""derivation" or "partially determined by" relationship could be subjective or context-dependent assertion, not an objectively true or false statement." Derivation issue # 2 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-24: Semantic document address "P and things used by P determine values of some of X's invariant properties (less strict)" Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-23: Create definition of involve to replace Use Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-22: We lose which entity was used to generate which entity. Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Implementation TF F2F1 Presentation Stephan Zednik
Prov WG F2F Agenda 6-7 July 2011 Luc Moreau

Tuesday, 5 July 2011

Re: Consolidated Concepts page Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: Task forces - brief presentations Eric Stephan
Re: Task forces - brief presentations Satya Sahoo
Re: Task forces - brief presentations Deborah L. McGuinness
Re: Task forces - brief presentations Satya Sahoo
Consolidated Concepts page Pgroth
Meeting Minutes 2011-06-30 Luc Moreau
Re: Task forces - brief presentations Simon Miles
Re: Task forces - brief presentations Graham Klyne

Saturday, 2 July 2011

Re: Task forces - brief presentations Eric Stephan

Friday, 1 July 2011

Dietary Requirements for Lunch at Meeting Next Week Sandro Hawke
Re: Task forces - brief presentations Paul Groth
Re: Task forces - brief presentations Simon Miles
Re: Implementation Stakeholder questionnaire approval Paul Groth
Task forces - brief presentations Paul Groth

Wednesday, 29 June 2011

Introduction + Comments on Concepts Reza B'Far
Re: Implementation Stakeholder questionnaire approval Reza B'Far

Thursday, 30 June 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-4: Defining Agent using FOAF's definition Reza B'Far

Friday, 1 July 2011

Re: assertion language Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-7: trying to reach consensus on derivation (deadline: Wednesday midnight GMT) Daniel Garijo

Last message date: Sunday, 31 July 2011 16:07:50 UTC