- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 07:01:35 +0000
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 22 December 2011 07:02:14 UTC
On Dec 21, 2011 6:52 AM, "Luc Moreau" <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > We have created a new section in which we discuss "structural constraints" such as > generation-unicity. This reads very well! I also like having this as separate section. I have one question (I might raise it as an issue of you like): the term "precedes" is used alot, but it is not clear if this is inclusive or exclusive, ie can say x precede y by 0 seconds? If not, then we are forcing a non-zero duration between say generation time and use time, which in most cases would be true, but not always measurable (both might be recorded with same time) In other (more conceptual) approaches this would not allow instant durations such as "luc-aged-20" derived from "luc-aged-19" (the increment activity here took 0s - or 1y if you like).
Received on Thursday, 22 December 2011 07:02:14 UTC