- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 11:25:08 +0100
- To: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>
- CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Satya, All: I noticed that many of the issues Satya raised (see below) talked about terms being domain specific. For example, collections and the typing of agent. I think we as a group need to figure out where we stand on constructs that can be considered domain specific. I would like to just get your general thoughts on this as I think getting a broad agreement on where we roughly draw the line on too much domain specificity will help us resolve these issues. Personally, I'm in favor of being more liberal here in terms of including constructs. Primarily because our purpose is interchange and having some what can be considered domain specific constructs will greatly help in facilitating provenance interchange. This is especially the case for common cases. Anyway, I'm interested to hear your thoughts. Thanks, Paul Issues to do with Domain Specificity PROV-ISSUE-185 PROV-ISSUE-188 PROV-ISSUE-192 PROV-ISSUE-193 PROV-ISSUE-194 PROV-ISSUE-198
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2011 10:28:41 UTC