W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > December 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-152 (QualifiedInvolvement): will the QualifiedInvolvement approach work for other relations? [Ontology]

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 16:10:28 -0500
To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <16053945-F9A2-43E4-BE17-D6B8A4353713@rpi.edu>
Luc,

I am in favor of your proposal to apply QualifiedInvolvements to a broader range of involvements, e.g. Activity-Activity.

In this case, the current definition of "QualifiedInvolvement" would be renamed to "QualifiedEntityInvolvement", the latter would become a subclass of a "new" QualifiedInvolvement, and a new QualifiedActivityInvolvement would become a subclass of QualfiedInvolvement.

Please see the changes to the PROV-O components listed in http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/7779ea84024f

(apologies that the omnigraffle file was included on that commit. Please ignore it)

In particular, see

http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/7779ea84024f/ontology/components/QualifiedInvolvement.ttl
for the ontology changes

http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/7779ea84024f/ontology/components/Start.ttl
for the first "Activity-based" qualified involvement subclass.

http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/7779ea84024f/ontology/components/wasStartedBy/prov-dm-wasStartedBy.ttl
for the DM mapping of wasStartedBy(a2,a1) to PROV-O

http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/7779ea84024f/ontology/components/wasStartedBy/prov-dm-constraint-wasStartedBy.ttl
for the DM constraint mapped to PROV-O.


Regards,
Tim



On Nov 17, 2011, at 7:19 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:

> 
> PROV-ISSUE-152 (QualifiedInvolvement): will the QualifiedInvolvement approach work for other relations? [Ontology]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/152
> 
> Raised by: Luc Moreau
> On product: Ontology
> 
> 
> The prov-o document has introduced a qualifier for participation, which is not in prov-dm.  There is increasing evidence that it is useful to qualify all/most relations of prov-dm.
> 
> Is the approach for qualifiedInvolvement be extensible for all relations? In particular, for Activity -> Activity relations, such as wasInformedBy.
> 
> QualifiedInvolvement seems to have "The hadQualifiedEntity property links the QualifiedInvolvement class with the Entity class.". But wasInformedBy does not have entity?
> 
> Thoughts?  
> 
> Note, this issue shouldn't block the release of the document as fpwd.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Received on Friday, 2 December 2011 21:11:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:04 UTC