W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > December 2011

Re: Examoples in primer

From: Simon Miles <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 16:00:49 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKc1nHekKguxC+7qEmqLVLh8NBSLHUAmAkyqQJ14akGHYuErqA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Khalid, Paolo, Graham,

Thanks for the comments.

A "fully-fledged" example all in one section sounds a good idea (and
you'll notice Section 3 is called Worked Examples in plural with
something like this in mind). I agree with Graham that it is good to
have a concise summary of concepts. I would also not want the primer
centred entirely on an example. We could possibly reduce the size of
the intro/intuition section so that the example appears sooner.

On Khalid's other comments:

The derivation relation probably could be introduced earlier, and I
agree that it is important. This should be easier to achieve given the
recent changes on derivation in the DM.

Regardless of whether all entities are generated by activities (I
think they are, and I think Jim Myers argued that it is this that
characterized them), I think this is the easiest explanation of
generation in the (non-normative) primer. But if you disagree, could
you be more specific in your concerns?

Thanks,
Simon

On 25 November 2011 16:45, Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk> wrote:
> Graham
>
> I completely agree with the incremental approach, I just thought it could be a nice "and here is a full-fledged example" section
> towards the end.
>
> Not a problem though!
>
> -Paolo
>
>
> On 11/25/11 12:20 PM, Graham Klyne wrote:
>> I have a nagging worry that if the Primer becomes dominated by the journalism
>> example, we'll lose the concise but readable summary that is (IMO) invaluable
>> for developers as both introduction and handy reference.
>>
>> The PROV-DM document doesn't really provide this IMO because it's very concerned
>> with the details of the ASN and model constraints.  The primer currently could
>> serve this role (e.g. as the OWL primer does for OWL), but I fear that if it is
>> completely structured around the example, it will become more of a
>> "painting-by-numbers" guide.
>>
>> I'm not necessarily saying that the journalism example should not be present.
>> But I really like the focused and progressive introduction of example material
>> which to my mind really backs up the Primer's role as a primer.
>>
>> #g
>> --
>
>
>



-- 
Dr Simon Miles
Lecturer, Department of Informatics
Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK
+44 (0)20 7848 1166

Modelling the Provenance of Data in Autonomous Systems:
http://eprints.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/1264/
Received on Thursday, 1 December 2011 16:01:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:04 UTC