- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 14:47:51 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Paul, all, I've completed items 1-7 on the plan. The renamed document is at: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/paq/prov-aq.html So I think it's just the pubrules to do. #g -- On 25/11/2011 09:42, Graham Klyne wrote: > Paul, > > I've drawn up an outline plan for progressing PROV-AQ to FPWD. Do you think > anything is missing here, or not required? > > ... > > Plan to progress PROV-AQ to FPWD > > 1. Change document tag and name from PAQ to PROV-AQ > 2. Review issues and comments; apply simple non-controversial editorial suggestions > 3. Close resolved issues > 4. Review call-out boxes (issues and pending) and remove those that don't refer > to live issues > 5. Update author list > 6. Update acknowledgements > 7. Add status of this document text (Where can I find a template/example for > this? W3C pubrules pages aren't helping me) > 8. Prepare HTML document that meets W3C pubrules [1] > 9. Submit for W3C FPWD publication > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules > > ... > > I note that we've received received quite a bit of useful feedback for > clarification over the past week or so, and I think it would be useful to > incorporate the simple editorial comments as they will hopefully help readers to > understand better what we're trying to do. I should be able to do items 1-6 > within the next week. > > #g > -- >
Received on Thursday, 1 December 2011 14:49:01 UTC