public-prov-wg@w3.org from December 2011 by date

Thursday, 29 December 2011

• PROV-O telecon summary Timothy Lebo

Friday, 23 December 2011

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-180 (TLebo): defaults to prov:steps="n" causes issue in PROV-O [prov-dm] Stian Soiland-Reyes

Thursday, 22 December 2011

• PROV-WG Minutes: Dec 22, 2012 Paul Groth
• Re: Formal semantics draft Luc Moreau
• prov-wg scribe today Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-198: Section 6.1 (PROV-DM as on Dec 5) [prov-dm] Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-WG: Telecon Agenda Dec 22, 2011 Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-180 (TLebo): defaults to prov:steps="n" causes issue in PROV-O [prov-dm] Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-DM structural constraints Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-180 (TLebo): defaults to prov:steps="n" causes issue in PROV-O [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-DM structural constraints Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-180 (TLebo): defaults to prov:steps="n" causes issue in PROV-O [prov-dm] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-180 (TLebo): defaults to prov:steps="n" causes issue in PROV-O [prov-dm] Stian Soiland-Reyes

Wednesday, 21 December 2011

• PROV-ISSUE-207 (start and end records): start and end records [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-206 (agent-asserted-not-inferred): agents should not be inferred, and wasAssociatedWith should also work with entities [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-204 (end-of-entity): What marks the end of an entity? [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-WG: Telecon Agenda Dec 22, 2011 Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-201: Section 8 (PROV-DM as on Dec 5) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-183 (prov-dm-identifiers): identifiers in prov-dm [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: viewOf / complementOf discussion in 201-12-15 telecon Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-150: question on formal semantics of role in wasGeneratedBy relation [Formal Semantics] Stephan Zednik
• Re: viewOf / complementOf discussion in 201-12-15 telecon Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-177 (TLebo): wasStartedBy's name is overloaded? [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-190: Section 5.3.1.1 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• PROV-DM structural constraints Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-150: question on formal semantics of role in wasGeneratedBy relation [Formal Semantics] Simon Miles
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-150: question on formal semantics of role in wasGeneratedBy relation [Formal Semantics] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-177 (TLebo): wasStartedBy's name is overloaded? [prov-dm] Luc Moreau

Tuesday, 20 December 2011

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] Jim McCusker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-180 (TLebo): defaults to prov:steps="n" causes issue in PROV-O [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-121: Constraint on PE (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] Luc Moreau
• Plan for Prov-aq going forward Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-203: Proposal to amend definition and usage of Plan in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: viewOf / complementOf discussion in 201-12-15 telecon Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-WG: Telecon Agenda Dec 22, 2011 Graham Klyne

Monday, 19 December 2011

• PROV-WG: Telecon Agenda Dec 22, 2011 Paul Groth
• Re: Formal semantics draft James Cheney
• Re: Formal semantics draft Graham Klyne
• Formal semantics draft James Cheney
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-203: Proposal to amend definition and usage of Plan in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-203: Proposal to amend definition and usage of Plan in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-203: Proposal to amend definition and usage of Plan in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-203: Proposal to amend definition and usage of Plan in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-191: Section 5.3.1.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-184: Section 2.1.2 (PROV-DM version as on Nov 28th) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-178 (TLebo): wasStartedBy constraint between started and generated entity [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-124: Constraints on Used Relation (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: Proposals to vote on related to 'event': deadline Dec 14th midnight GMT Luc Moreau

Sunday, 18 December 2011

• Re: viewOf / complementOf discussion in 201-12-15 telecon Graham Klyne
• Re: viewOf / complementOf discussion in 201-12-15 telecon Graham Klyne

Saturday, 17 December 2011

• Re: viewOf / complementOf discussion in 201-12-15 telecon Paolo Missier

Friday, 16 December 2011

• PROV-WG: Minutes of Dec 8, 2011 Telcon Paul Groth
• Re: Proposals to vote on related to 'event': deadline Dec 14th midnight GMT Luc Moreau
• Re: Detailed fedback on PROV-DM document Luc Moreau
• Re: viewOf / complementOf discussion in 201-12-15 telecon Graham Klyne
• prov-wg meeting minutes 2011-12-15 Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-203: Proposal to amend definition and usage of Plan in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-203: Proposal to amend definition and usage of Plan in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Stephan Zednik

Thursday, 15 December 2011

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-203: Proposal to amend definition and usage of Plan in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-203: Proposal to amend definition and usage of Plan in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-203: Proposal to amend definition and usage of Plan in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Stephan Zednik
• prov-dm WD2 is out Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-203: Proposal to amend definition and usage of Plan in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-203: Proposal to amend definition and usage of Plan in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-203: Proposal to amend definition and usage of Plan in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Yolanda Gil
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-203: Proposal to amend definition and usage of Plan in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• PROV-ISSUE-203: Proposal to amend definition and usage of Plan in PROV-DM [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: viewOf / complementOf discussion in 201-12-15 telecon Jim McCusker
• Re: viewOf / complementOf discussion in 201-12-15 telecon Paolo Missier
• Re: viewOf / complementOf discussion in 201-12-15 telecon (correction) Graham Klyne
• viewOf / complementOf discussion in 201-12-15 telecon Graham Klyne
• Re: Revised primer for public release Simon Miles
• Re: Revised primer for public release Yolanda Gil
• complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text Paolo Missier
• scribe required for today's call ... thank you! Luc Moreau
• Re: Revised primer for public release Simon Miles
• provenance working group issues (more around process but some technical Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: Proposals to vote on related to 'event': deadline Dec 14th midnight GMT Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: Proposals to vote on related to 'event': deadline Dec 14th midnight GMT James Cheney
• Re: Proposals to vote on related to 'event': deadline Dec 14th midnight GMT Jim McCusker

Wednesday, 14 December 2011

• Re: Proposals to vote on related to 'event': deadline Dec 14th midnight GMT James Cheney
• Re: Revised primer for public release Daniel Garijo
• Re: Contributions and Supersedes Jim McCusker
• Re: Contributions and Supersedes Daniel Garijo
• Fwd: Contributions and Supersedes Paul Groth
• Re: Proposals to vote on related to 'event': deadline Dec 14th midnight GMT Curt Tilmes
• Re: Proposals to vote on related to 'event': deadline Dec 14th midnight GMT Stephan Zednik
• Re: Proposals to vote on related to 'event': deadline Dec 14th midnight GMT Timothy Lebo
• Re: Proposals to vote on related to 'event': deadline Dec 14th midnight GMT Carl Reed
• Re: prov-dm - when are constructs too domain specific? Paul Groth
• Re: prov-dm - when are constructs too domain specific? Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Proposals to vote on related to 'event': deadline Dec 14th midnight GMT Jim McCusker
• Re: Revised primer for public release Stephan Zednik
• Re: Detailed fedback on PROV-DM document Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: prov-dm: draft for the new 'hadPlan' relation Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: prov-dm: draft for the new 'hadPlan' relation Luc Moreau
• Re: prov-dm: draft for the new 'hadPlan' relation Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Prov-o fpwd Stian Soiland-Reyes
• RE: Proposals to vote on related to 'event': deadline Dec 14th midnight GMT Myers, Jim
• Re: Proposals to vote on related to 'event': deadline Dec 14th midnight GMT Luc Moreau
• prov-dm: new interpretation section Luc Moreau
• Re: Proposals to vote on related to 'event': deadline Dec 14th midnight GMT Paolo Missier
• prov-dm: draft for the new 'hadPlan' relation Luc Moreau
• PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 15 Dec 2011 Luc Moreau
• Re: Proposals to vote on related to 'event': deadline Dec 14th midnight GMT Luc Moreau
• Re: Proposals to vote on related to 'event': deadline Dec 14th midnight GMT Simon Miles
• Revised primer for public release Simon Miles
• Re: Proposals to vote on related to 'event': deadline Dec 14th midnight GMT Daniel Garijo
• Prov-o fpwd Luc Moreau

Monday, 12 December 2011

• Re: PROV-O call James Cheney
• Re: PROV-O call Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-184: Section 2.1.2 (PROV-DM version as on Nov 28th) [prov-dm] Jim McCusker

Saturday, 10 December 2011

• Re: Proposals to vote on related to 'event': deadline Dec 14th midnight GMT Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-200: Section 6.3 (PROV-DM as on Dec 5) [prov-dm] Satya Sahoo

Friday, 9 December 2011

• Re: Proposals to vote on related to 'event': deadline Dec 14th midnight GMT Reza B'Far (Oracle)
• Proposals to vote on related to 'event': deadline Dec 14th midnight GMT Luc Moreau
• PROV-ISSUE-202 (PROV-AQ-coverage-summary): PROV-AQ give brief map of contents in introduction [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-184: Section 2.1.2 (PROV-DM version as on Nov 28th) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-184: Section 2.1.2 (PROV-DM version as on Nov 28th) [prov-dm] Paul Groth

Thursday, 8 December 2011

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-184: Section 2.1.2 (PROV-DM version as on Nov 28th) [prov-dm] Jim McCusker
• Re: ISSUE-23: Create definition of involve to replace Use Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-182 (TLebo): stronger name for "wasAssociatedWith" [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-182 (TLebo): stronger name for "wasAssociatedWith" [prov-dm] Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-182 (TLebo): stronger name for "wasAssociatedWith" [prov-dm] Stephan Zednik
• Apologies - telecon 8 Dec Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-182 (TLebo): stronger name for "wasAssociatedWith" [prov-dm] Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-182 (TLebo): stronger name for "wasAssociatedWith" [prov-dm] Yolanda Gil
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-182 (TLebo): stronger name for "wasAssociatedWith" [prov-dm] Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-182 (TLebo): stronger name for "wasAssociatedWith" [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-191: Section 5.3.1.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Satya Sahoo
• Detailed fedback on PROV-DM document Yolanda Gil
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-151 (TLebo): Rename wasQuoteOf to wasQuotedFrom [Data Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-180 (TLebo): defaults to prov:steps="n" causes issue in PROV-O [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-176 (TLebo): wasInformedBy's non-transitivity example is confusing [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-49 (Participation): Suggested definition for Participation [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-184: Section 2.1.2 (PROV-DM version as on Nov 28th) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-201: Section 8 (PROV-DM as on Dec 5) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-200: Section 6.3 (PROV-DM as on Dec 5) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-199: Section 6.2 (PROV-DM as on Dec 5) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-197: Section 5.4.1 and Section 5.4.2 (PROV-DM as on Dec 5) Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-196: Section 5.3.4 (PROV-DM as on Dec 5) Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-194: Section 5.3.3.1 and Section 5.3.3.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-193: Section 5.3.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-192: Section 5.3.2.1 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-191: Section 5.3.1.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-189: Section 5.2.4 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-187: Section 5.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-101 (Conceptual Model): Section 5.2.2 ProcessExecution (conceptual model document review) [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-105: 5.3.1 Generation (current version of the conceptual model document) [Conceptual Model] Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-187: Section 5.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-101 (Conceptual Model): Section 5.2.2 ProcessExecution (conceptual model document review) [Conceptual Model] Satya Sahoo

Wednesday, 7 December 2011

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-190: Section 5.3.1.1 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-187: Section 5.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-186: Section 5.2.1 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• prov-dm - when are constructs too domain specific? Paul Groth
• PROV-WG: Telecon Agenda Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-185: Section 3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-183 (prov-dm-identifiers): identifiers in prov-dm [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-183 (prov-dm-identifiers): identifiers in prov-dm [prov-dm] Myers, Jim
• PROV-ISSUE-201: Section 8 (PROV-DM as on Dec 5) [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-200: Section 6.3 (PROV-DM as on Dec 5) [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-199: Section 6.2 (PROV-DM as on Dec 5) [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-198: Section 6.1 (PROV-DM as on Dec 5) [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-197: Section 5.4.1 and Section 5.4.2 (PROV-DM as on Dec 5) Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-196: Section 5.3.4 (PROV-DM as on Dec 5) Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-195: Section 5.3.3.3 (PROV-DM as on Dec 5) Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-194: Section 5.3.3.1 and Section 5.3.3.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-193: Section 5.3.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-192: Section 5.3.2.1 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-191: Section 5.3.1.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-190: Section 5.3.1.1 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-189: Section 5.2.4 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-187: Section 5.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-186: Section 5.2.1 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-185: Section 3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-184: Section 2.1.2 (PROV-DM version as on Nov 28th) [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-49 (Participation): Suggested definition for Participation [Conceptual Model] Satya Sahoo

Tuesday, 6 December 2011

• Meeting minutes 2011-12-01 Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-183 (prov-dm-identifiers): identifiers in prov-dm [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-183 (prov-dm-identifiers): identifiers in prov-dm [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-183 (prov-dm-identifiers): identifiers in prov-dm [prov-dm] Myers, Jim
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-183 (prov-dm-identifiers): identifiers in prov-dm [prov-dm] Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-183 (prov-dm-identifiers): identifiers in prov-dm [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-183 (prov-dm-identifiers): identifiers in prov-dm [prov-dm] Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-183 (prov-dm-identifiers): identifiers in prov-dm [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-183 (prov-dm-identifiers): identifiers in prov-dm [prov-dm] Simon Miles
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-183 (prov-dm-identifiers): identifiers in prov-dm [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-183 (prov-dm-identifiers): identifiers in prov-dm [prov-dm] Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-183 (prov-dm-identifiers): identifiers in prov-dm [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-183 (prov-dm-identifiers): identifiers in prov-dm [prov-dm] Paul Groth
• PROV-ISSUE-183 (prov-dm-identifiers): identifiers in prov-dm [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

Monday, 5 December 2011

• PROV-O call Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-181 (TLebo): include reference to SPARQL service description [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-154 (RDF-provenance-service-uri): Include provenance-service-uri for RDF resources [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-166 (TLebo): Sufficient _what_? Graham Klyne
• Re: SPARQL endpoint discovery - two suggestions Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-152 (QualifiedInvolvement): will the QualifiedInvolvement approach work for other relations? [Ontology] Luc Moreau

Sunday, 4 December 2011

• Re: Examoples in primer Simon Miles
• Re: PROV-DM derivation concerns arising from my primer review Simon Miles

Saturday, 3 December 2011

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-155 (prov-o-pre-fpwd): general comments on prov-o document [Formal Semantics] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-155 (prov-o-pre-fpwd): general comments on prov-o document [Formal Semantics] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-91 (what-to-define-for-location): what should we define under the heading 'location' [Conceptual Model] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-158 (TLebo): Cite temporal ordering constraint [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
• PROV-ISSUE-182 (TLebo): stronger name for "wasAssociatedWith" [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-143 (Tlebo): Qualifiers - why does order matter? [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-126: Section 5.3.3.2 "Process Execution Independent Derivation Expression." [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-48 (Provenance Concept: Revision): Revision should be a class and not a property [Conceptual Model] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-168 (TLebo): HTTP POSTing a provenance URI to an originating source [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-124: Constraints on Used Relation (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-166 (TLebo): Sufficient _what_? Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-175 (TLebo): 4.3 Provenance service discovery [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Timothy Lebo
• Re: Primer first draft for review Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-164 (TLebo): pre-determined versus determined [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-162 (TLebo): Entities can only be web resources? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Timothy Lebo

Friday, 2 December 2011

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-172 (TLebo): purpose of prov:hasAnchor [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-167 (TLebo): What is a "normal web resource"? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Timothy Lebo
• Re: A proposal for modeling agents Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-157 (TLebo): wasInformedBy's non-transitivity Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-155 (prov-o-pre-fpwd): general comments on prov-o document [Formal Semantics] Timothy Lebo
• Re: SPARQL endpoint discovery - two suggestions Timothy Lebo
• Re: Comments on PAQ Timothy Lebo
• PROV-ISSUE-181 (TLebo): include reference to SPARQL service description [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-154 (RDF-provenance-service-uri): Include provenance-service-uri for RDF resources [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-152 (QualifiedInvolvement): will the QualifiedInvolvement approach work for other relations? [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-156 (TLebo): information flow ordering record - no temporal constraints? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
• PROV-ISSUE-180 (TLebo): defaults to prov:steps="n" causes issue in PROV-O [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-156 (TLebo): information flow ordering record - no temporal constraints? [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
• Re: Renaming of ProcessExecution to Activity Jim McCusker
• Re: PROV-O comments Simon Miles
• PROV-ISSUE-179 (TLebo): defaults to prov:steps="n" causes issue in PROV-O [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Renaming of ProcessExecution to Activity Simon Miles
• Re: Renaming of ProcessExecution to Activity Jim McCusker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] Simon Miles
• PROV-ISSUE-178 (TLebo): wasStartedBy constraint between started and generated entity [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-177 (TLebo): wasStartedBy's name is overloaded? [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] Simon Miles
• PROV-ISSUE-176 (TLebo): wasInformedBy's non-transitivity example is confusing [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Renaming of ProcessExecution to Activity Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Renaming of ProcessExecution to Activity Jim McCusker
• Re: Renaming of ProcessExecution to Activity Stian Soiland-Reyes

Thursday, 1 December 2011

• PROV-WG: F2F2 logistics information Paul Groth
• Complementarity Luc Moreau
• PROV-WG: Christmas Break Paul Groth
• Re: Examoples in primer Simon Miles
• Re: Renaming of ProcessExecution to Activity Luc Moreau
• scribe for today Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] Simon Miles
• Renaming of ProcessExecution to Activity Stian Soiland-Reyes
• PROV-WG Minutes Nov 24, 2011 Telecon Paul Groth
• Re: Plan to progress PROV-AQ to FPWD Graham Klyne
• Closing issues on PROV-AQ Graham Klyne
• PAQ working draft document renamed to PROV-AQ Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Prov-wg: ignore that last email... Paul Groth
• Tech Team Telecon: Agenda Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-91 (what-to-define-for-location): what should we define under the heading 'location' [Conceptual Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes

Last message date: Thursday, 29 December 2011 16:40:56 UTC