public-prov-wg@w3.org from August 2011 by date

Wednesday, 31 August 2011

Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 01 Sep 2011 Eric Stephan
PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 01 Sep 2011 Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model] Simon Miles
Re: PROV-ISSUE-66 (is-execution-a-bob): Why is process execution not defined as a characterised entity? [Conceptual Model] Simon Miles

Tuesday, 30 August 2011

RE: PROV-ISSUE-81 (identity-clash-scope): In a given scope, are entities with same identifier but different attributes legal? [Conceptual Model] Myers, Jim

Monday, 29 August 2011

RE: views, complements and invariants (was: updates to PAQ doc for discussion) Myers, Jim

Saturday, 27 August 2011

Re: formal semantics strawman James Cheney
Re: formal semantics strawman James Cheney
Re: PROV-ISSUE-76 (xml-examples): Shouldn't we have proper examples in XML and not RDF/XML [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Jim McCusker
Re: [Spam:***** SpamScore] Re: formal semantics strawman Jim McCusker
RE: [Spam:***** SpamScore] Re: formal semantics strawman Myers, Jim

Friday, 26 August 2011

Thursday, 25 August 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-66 (is-execution-a-bob): Why is process execution not defined as a characterised entity? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-78 (contexts-and-provenance-uris): multiple contexts and provenance-uris [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-77 (paq-terminology): terminology issues [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-76 (xml-examples): Shouldn't we have proper examples in XML and not RDF/XML [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-75 (provenance-service-and-provenance-uri): What do we do when we get both provenance service and provenance-uri? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-55 (are-provenance-uris-needed): Are provenance URIs really needed [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Luc Moreau
Re: Provenance requirements for RDF named graphs Graham Klyne
Re: formal semantics strawman Graham Klyne
Provenance requirements for RDF named graphs Satya Sahoo
Re: cross-referencing constraints in conceptual model and formal model James Cheney
formal semantics strawman James Cheney
Re: cross-referencing constraints in conceptual model and formal model Graham Klyne
Provenance model document is over-complicated and hard to understand Graham Klyne
Re: [PAQ] rel="me" Graham Klyne
Re: playing with pil ontology Daniel Garijo
ISSUE-83: Express inverse relationships in Provenance Model as well as ontology Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-40 (recommended-roles): Roles should not be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth
Re: [PAQ] rel="me" Paul Groth
Re: [PAQ] rel="me" Graham Klyne
Re: playing with pil ontology Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-80 (about-provenance-template): Query about provenance template [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Graham Klyne
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Graham Klyne
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-78 (contexts-and-provenance-uris): multiple contexts and provenance-uris [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-79 (provenance-uri-contract): what is the contract associated with provenance-uris [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-67 (single-execution): Why is there a difference in what is represented by one vs multiple executions? [Conceptual Model] Simon Miles
Re: PROV-ISSUE-66 (is-execution-a-bob): Why is process execution not defined as a characterised entity? [Conceptual Model] Simon Miles
Re: cross-referencing constraints in conceptual model and formal model James Cheney
Re: playing with pil ontology Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-77 (paq-terminology): terminology issues [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne
Re: cross-referencing constraints in conceptual model and formal model Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-75 (provenance-service-and-provenance-uri): What do we do when we get both provenance service and provenance-uri? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne
Provenance context URIs for RDF data (was: PAQ document update, target renamed as context) Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 25 August 2011 Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-72 (DGarijo): Uses should be renamed as used [Formal Model] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-76 (xml-examples): Shouldn't we have proper examples in XML and not RDF/XML [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne
Re: PAQ document update, target renamed as context Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-55 (are-provenance-uris-needed): Are provenance URIs really needed [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne
views, complements and invariants (was: updates to PAQ doc for discussion) Graham Klyne
Re: PAQ document update, target renamed as context Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-65 (domain-specific-info): How is domain specific data combined with the generic model [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: playing with pil ontology Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-71 (Conceptual Model draft): Section 3.2 of Conceptual Model draft (Content and Editing) [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
PROV-ISSUE-82 (pidm-event): Should we introduce a notion of event in the data model? [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-71 (Conceptual Model draft): Section 3.2 of Conceptual Model draft (Content and Editing) [Conceptual Model] James Cheney

Wednesday, 24 August 2011

Re: [PAQ] rel="me" Luc Moreau
PROV-ISSUE-81 (identity-clash-scope): In a given scope, are entities with same identifier but different attributes legal? [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
[PAQ] rel="me" Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-71 (Conceptual Model draft): Section 3.2 of Conceptual Model draft (Content and Editing) [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
RE: PROV-ISSUE-72 (DGarijo): Uses should be renamed as used [Formal Model] Ralph Hodgson
Weekly Connection Task Force Call - each Monday Eric Stephan
Re: PROV-ISSUE-71 (Conceptual Model draft): Section 3.2 of Conceptual Model draft (Content and Editing) [Conceptual Model] Satya Sahoo
Re: playing with pil ontology Daniel Garijo
PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 25 August 2011 Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-65 (domain-specific-info): How is domain specific data combined with the generic model [Conceptual Model] Simon Miles
Re: PROV-ISSUE-72 (DGarijo): Uses should be renamed as used [Formal Model] Simon Miles
Re: playing with pil ontology Simon Miles

Tuesday, 23 August 2011

Re: playing with pil ontology Luc Moreau
Re: playing with pil ontology Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-72 (DGarijo): Uses should be renamed as used [Formal Model] Deborah L. McGuinness
Re: PROV-ISSUE-72 (DGarijo): Uses should be renamed as used [Formal Model] Satya Sahoo
RE: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Myers, Jim
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Paul Groth
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Luc Moreau
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Khalid Belhajjame
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-71 (Conceptual Model draft): Section 3.2 of Conceptual Model draft (Content and Editing) [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
RE: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Myers, Jim
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Luc Moreau
RE: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Myers, Jim
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Luc Moreau
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Simon Miles
RE: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Myers, Jim
RE: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Myers, Jim
PROV-ISSUE-80 (about-provenance-template): Query about provenance template [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-79 (provenance-uri-contract): what is the contract associated with provenance-uris [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Luc Moreau
Re: closing issues for the Model Document Luc Moreau
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Luc Moreau
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Luc Moreau
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Luc Moreau
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Luc Moreau
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Khalid Belhajjame
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Luc Moreau
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Khalid Belhajjame
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-78 (contexts-and-provenance-uris): multiple contexts and provenance-uris [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-78 (contexts-and-provenance-uris): multiple contexts and provenance-uris [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Luc Moreau
Guidelines for the Connection Task Force Report Kai Eckert
Re: PROV-ISSUE-78 (contexts-and-provenance-uris): multiple contexts and provenance-uris [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Olaf Hartig

Monday, 22 August 2011

PROV-ISSUE-78 (contexts-and-provenance-uris): multiple contexts and provenance-uris [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-77 (paq-terminology): terminology issues [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-76 (xml-examples): Shouldn't we have proper examples in XML and not RDF/XML [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-75 (provenance-service-and-provenance-uri): What do we do when we get both provenance service and provenance-uri? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-55 (are-provenance-uris-needed): Are provenance URIs really needed [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-55 (are-provenance-uris-needed): Are provenance URIs really needed [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-72 (DGarijo): Uses should be renamed as used [Formal Model] Daniel Garijo
closing issues for the Model Document Luc Moreau
RE: PROV-ISSUE-72 (DGarijo): Uses should be renamed as used [Formal Model] Ralph Hodgson
Re: PROV-ISSUE-65 (domain-specific-info): How is domain specific data combined with the generic model [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-67 (single-execution): Why is there a difference in what is represented by one vs multiple executions? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-66 (is-execution-a-bob): Why is process execution not defined as a characterised entity? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-62 (about-prov-language): about provenance language [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-62 (about-prov-language): about provenance language [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-61 (is-revision-necessary): is revision necessary? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-60: comments on bob [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-59 (generation-definition): on generation [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-58 (time-iso8601): is reference to iso8601 appropriate? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-51 (asserter-def): Asserter needs to be defined with respect to a provenance container/account [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-56 (derivation-definition-does-not-imply-transitivity): Derivation as defined is not transitive [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-48 (Provenance Concept: Revision): Revision should be a class and not a property [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-45: isDerivedFrom and IVPof are transitive. [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-41 (distinct-roles): Distinct roles should be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-40 (recommended-roles): Roles should not be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-39 (generation-identifiable-activity): Generation should be defined as an identifable activity [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-33: Section 3.1 and Section 3.2: example of IVPof [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-32: Bob definition [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-72 (DGarijo): Uses should be renamed as used [Formal Model] Luc Moreau
RE: PROV-ISSUE-72 (DGarijo): Uses should be renamed as used [Formal Model] Ralph Hodgson
RE: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Myers, Jim
Re: cross-referencing constraints in conceptual model and formal model Luc Moreau
RE: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Myers, Jim
Re: cross-referencing constraints in conceptual model and formal model James Cheney
Re: cross-referencing constraints in conceptual model and formal model Luc Moreau
Re: PAQ document update, target renamed as context Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-72 (DGarijo): Uses should be renamed as used [Formal Model] Luc Moreau
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Graham Klyne
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Graham Klyne
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Khalid Belhajjame
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-67 (single-execution): Why is there a difference in what is represented by one vs multiple executions? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-69 (Process Execution): Process execution occurs over a "continuous time interval"? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau

Sunday, 21 August 2011

Re: PAQ document update, target renamed as context Olaf Hartig
Re: PAQ document update, target renamed as context Olaf Hartig
Re: playing with pil ontology Daniel Garijo

Saturday, 20 August 2011

RE: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Myers, Jim
Re: PAQ document update, target renamed as context Graham Klyne
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Graham Klyne

Friday, 19 August 2011

RE: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Myers, Jim
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Graham Klyne
RE: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Myers, Jim
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Graham Klyne
RE: PAQ document update, target renamed as context Yogesh Simmhan
Re: PAQ document update, target renamed as context Graham Klyne
Re: PAQ document update, target renamed as context Graham Klyne
RE: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Myers, Jim
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Graham Klyne
Re: playing with pil ontology Graham Klyne

Thursday, 18 August 2011

CIDOC-CRM Ontology Ralph Hodgson
test message please ignore Ralph Hodgson
Re: PAQ document update, target renamed as context Olaf Hartig
Re: [PAQ] editorial issues Olaf Hartig
Re: PAQ document update, target renamed as context Olaf Hartig
cross-referencing constraints in conceptual model and formal model James Cheney
RE: Telecon Agenda Aug 18, 2011 Yogesh Simmhan
Regrets ... Khalid Belhajjame
regrets for telecon 8/18, 8/25, and stakeholder questionnaire status update Stephan Zednik
RE: PAQ document update, target renamed as context Yogesh Simmhan

Wednesday, 17 August 2011

RE: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Myers, Jim
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Khalid Belhajjame
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Khalid Belhajjame
Re: playing with pil ontology Daniel Garijo
PAQ document update, target renamed as context Graham Klyne
Possible regrets (was: Telecon Agenda Aug 18, 2011) Graham Klyne
Re: playing with pil ontology Graham Klyne
Re: Updated stakeholders survey on wiki, need to compile list of communities to inform when survey goes live Deborah L. McGuinness

Tuesday, 16 August 2011

RE: playing with pil ontology Myers, Jim
Updated stakeholders survey on wiki, need to compile list of communities to inform when survey goes live Stephan Zednik
Re: playing with pil ontology Satya Sahoo
Re: playing with pil ontology Daniel Garijo
RE: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Myers, Jim
Telecon Agenda Aug 18, 2011 Paul Groth
RE: playing with pil ontology Deus, Helena
Re: playing with pil ontology Graham Klyne
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Graham Klyne
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Graham Klyne
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Paul Groth
RE: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Myers, Jim

Monday, 15 August 2011

Re: playing with pil ontology Daniel Garijo
Re: playing with pil ontology Graham Klyne
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Graham Klyne
RE: playing with pil ontology Myers, Jim
Re: playing with pil ontology Daniel Garijo
Re: playing with pil ontology Graham Klyne
RE: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Myers, Jim
Re: [paq] using anchor or different links Graham Klyne
RE: playing with pil ontology Myers, Jim
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Graham Klyne
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Graham Klyne
RE: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Myers, Jim
RE: [paq] using anchor or different links Yogesh Simmhan
RE: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Myers, Jim
RE: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Myers, Jim
Re: playing with pil ontology Satya Sahoo
Re: Connection Task Force Conference Call Eric Stephan
Re: [paq] using anchor or different links Graham Klyne
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Graham Klyne
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Graham Klyne
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Graham Klyne
RE: playing with pil ontology Deus, Helena

Sunday, 14 August 2011

Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Paul Groth
RE: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Myers, Jim
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Simon Miles

Friday, 12 August 2011

Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Paul Groth
RE: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Myers, Jim
Re: Dates for second F2F Kai Eckert
Re: playing with pil ontology Khalid Belhajjame
Re: [paq] using anchor or different links Paul Groth
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Paul Groth
Re: playing with pil ontology Jim McCusker

Thursday, 11 August 2011

RE: [paq] using anchor or different links Yogesh Simmhan
RE: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Myers, Jim
Re: playing with pil ontology Paul Groth
[paq] using anchor or different links Paul Groth
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Paul Groth
playing with pil ontology Deus, Helena
Minutes of Aug. 11 2011 Telecon Paul Groth
PROV-ISSUE-74: Consider renaming target-uri as context-uri to be consistent with RFC 5988 [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-73: Use "anchor" context URI instead of introducing a "target" relationship in HTTP [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-72 (DGarijo): Uses should be renamed as used [Formal Model] Simon Miles
PROV-ISSUE-72 (DGarijo): Uses should be renamed as used [Formal Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
RE: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Myers, Jim
RE: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Yogesh Simmhan
Re: updates to PAQ doc for discussion Khalid Belhajjame

Wednesday, 10 August 2011

updates to PAQ doc for discussion Paul Groth
Telecon Agenda Aug 11, 2011 Paul Groth
Re: defining shortcuts and extensions Paul Groth
defining shortcuts and extensions Daniel Garijo
Re: call for new question ideas for the 2nd implementation stakeholder questionnaire Daniel Garijo

Tuesday, 9 August 2011

Re: Connection Task Force Conference Call Kai Eckert
Re: Connection Task Force Conference Call Eric Stephan
Connection Task Force Conference Call Kai Eckert
Re: naming the standard Paul Groth
Re: naming the standard Khalid Belhajjame
Re: defining shortcuts and extensions Paul Groth
Re: defining shortcuts and extensions Simon Miles
Discussion focus for the next two weeks Paul Groth
defining shortcuts and extensions Paul Groth
Re: naming the standard Paul Groth
Re: naming the standard Graham Klyne

Monday, 8 August 2011

call for new question ideas for the 2nd implementation stakeholder questionnaire Stephan Zednik
name of standards - responses Paul Groth
naming the standard Paul Groth

Sunday, 7 August 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-71 (Conceptual Model draft): Section 3.2 of Conceptual Model draft (Content and Editing) [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau

Saturday, 6 August 2011

Friday, 5 August 2011

Thursday, 4 August 2011

Wednesday, 3 August 2011

Tuesday, 2 August 2011

Monday, 1 August 2011

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 August 2011 17:35:27 UTC