- From: Lukasz Machowski <lukaszmac@mweb.co.za>
- Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 10:39:53 +0200
- To: <public-prov-comments@w3.org>
- Cc: <nanovc@outlook.com>
Received on Monday, 27 September 2021 08:34:19 UTC
Dear PROV Wizards
Thank you for an incredible piece of thought leadership with PROV.
I am busy doing my PhD on the topic of Nano Version Control and how it can
be used for preservation of manual changes. I came across a bug in EXAMPLE
10.
The correction to the xml example is highlighted in yellow below. In the
official version, the slash is simply missing.
<!-- https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-prov-xml-20130430/#term-Communication
-->
<prov:document
xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance
xmlns:xsd=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema
xmlns:prov=http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xmlns:ex=http://example.com/ns/ex#>
<prov:activity prov:id="ex:a1">
<prov:type xsi:type="xsd:string">traffic regulations
enforcing</prov:type>
</prov:activity>
<prov:activity prov:id="ex:a2">
<prov:type xsi:type="xsd:string">fine paying, check writing, and
mailing</prov:type>
</prov:activity>
<prov:wasInformedBy>
<prov:informed prov:ref="ex:a2"/>
<prov:informant prov:ref="ex:a1"/>
</prov:wasInformedBy>
</prov:document>
Kind regards
Lukasz Machowski
Received on Monday, 27 September 2021 08:34:19 UTC