- From: Lukasz Machowski <lukaszmac@mweb.co.za>
- Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 10:39:53 +0200
- To: <public-prov-comments@w3.org>
- Cc: <nanovc@outlook.com>
Received on Monday, 27 September 2021 08:34:19 UTC
Dear PROV Wizards Thank you for an incredible piece of thought leadership with PROV. I am busy doing my PhD on the topic of Nano Version Control and how it can be used for preservation of manual changes. I came across a bug in EXAMPLE 10. The correction to the xml example is highlighted in yellow below. In the official version, the slash is simply missing. <!-- https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-prov-xml-20130430/#term-Communication --> <prov:document xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance xmlns:xsd=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema xmlns:prov=http://www.w3.org/ns/prov# xmlns:ex=http://example.com/ns/ex#> <prov:activity prov:id="ex:a1"> <prov:type xsi:type="xsd:string">traffic regulations enforcing</prov:type> </prov:activity> <prov:activity prov:id="ex:a2"> <prov:type xsi:type="xsd:string">fine paying, check writing, and mailing</prov:type> </prov:activity> <prov:wasInformedBy> <prov:informed prov:ref="ex:a2"/> <prov:informant prov:ref="ex:a1"/> </prov:wasInformedBy> </prov:document> Kind regards Lukasz Machowski
Received on Monday, 27 September 2021 08:34:19 UTC