Re: Illegal punning in prov-o.ttl, prov.ttl imports broken

Hi, I wonder if this issue from 2017 is still outstanding as I just got
an email:


> we detected an issue with prov-o:wasRevisionOf when it is loaded into Protégé and found your post
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-comments/2017May/0000.html where you describe
> the reason.
>
> Unfortunately, this issue blocks the proper derivation of wasInfluencedBy information in our showcase.
> Since we hesitate to make up our own branch of a corrected revision in order to conform PROV-O,
> we wonder why this issue was not yet resolved.  Are there any plans to publish a revision of PROV-O?


Paul/Ivan, can we try to push out the previous update of prov-o.ttl etc on w3.org?


On Fri, 12 May 2017 15:54:46 +0200, Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com> wrote:
> We may not need to record a change in the erratta but I think more
> visibility the better.
> 
> @Stian - thank you for raising it on these lists.
> 
> I would also like to double check the changes to see if it's all in working
> order before any changes to the official ontologies.
> 
> 
> Paul
> 
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> >
> > > On 12 May 2017, at 16:47, Stian Soiland-Reyes <
> > soiland-reyes@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 12 May 2017 15:41:45 +0200, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> > >> However… I am a little bit uneasy. First of all, it must be recorded
> > >> in the errata, that is for sure. But I would also prefer to see some
> > >> record of wide consensus that this is indeed what has to be done (and
> > >> record the consensus in the relevant erratum) before changing the
> > >> ontology files, because we are, essentially, creating a discrepancy
> > >> between the standard and the ttl files.
> > >
> > > I disagree on the need for the errata as it would not cause any
> > > discrepancy with the standard (which doesn't even distinguish between
> > > Object Properties or Annotatoin Properties).
> >
> > If that is indeed the case, then I agree with you.
> >
> > Ivan
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I do agree we could check wider if we're correct in my suggested
> > > approach, so we don't do any double-trouble or break something else.
> > >
> > > I'll raise it on the semantic-web list and OWLAPI list.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Stian Soiland-Reyes
> > > The University of Manchester
> > > http://www.esciencelab.org.uk/
> > > http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
> > >
> >
> >
> > ----
> > Ivan Herman, W3C
> > Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
> > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> > mobile: +31-641044153
> > ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
Non-text part: text/html

Received on Tuesday, 30 June 2020 16:34:04 UTC