- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 16:34:42 +0000
- To: lewis john mcgibbney <lewismc@apache.org>, "public-prov-comments@w3.org" <public-prov-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <D5780135E58FC940BDB87E7D499910184B46D33B@MBXP14.ds.man.ac.uk>
I would commend your alignment towards PROV 😊 – although it might mean you having to challenge some of the existing ontology design, at least if you want to go for a “sound” (semantically consistent) integration rather than a quicker “scruffy” provenance. Just a note – I think you sent the wrong link. I found the PROV discussion at https://github.com/ESIPFed/sweet/issues/28 -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, eScience Lab School of Computer Science, The University of Manchester http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718 From: lewis john mcgibbney<mailto:lewismc@apache.org> Sent: 31 August 2017 15:15 To: public-prov-comments@w3.org<mailto:public-prov-comments@w3.org> Subject: Alignment between prov-o and SWEET Hi Folks, We recently open sourced and transitioned the SWEET Ontology suite [0] from NASA JPL over to the ESIP Federation [1] and have renewed the interest in the resource from within ESIP and further afield. I'm currently spearheading an effort to bring SWEET up-to-date with a wide variety of advances in ontologies such as the excellent work undertaken by this WG on prov-o. Right now I am working on aligning SWEET with prov-o and would really appreciate input/peer review from this WG on alignment accuracy and extent. So far initial discussion can be seen at [2]. I propose to use the Alignment API software [3] developed by INRIA Rhône-Alpes, France to determine basic alignments. My choice of alignment software was determined by reviewing a larger list of ontology matching software [4] and making a judgement about software usability in order to determine instances of owl:equivalentClass. As you can see, very little work has been done. I am therefore looking to extend alignments in any way, shape or form which is accurate and factually correct. If you are able to provide input on wherever else I may be missing additional alignments, please comment at [2]. Thank you kindly in advance, Lewis [0] https://github.com/ESIPFed/sweet [1] http://esipfed.org [2] https://github.com/ESIPFed/sweet/pull/38 [3] http://alignapi.gforge.inria.fr/align.html [4] http://ontologymatching.org/projects.html -- http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/ @hectorMcSpector http://www.linkedin.com/in/lmcgibbney
Received on Monday, 4 September 2017 16:35:11 UTC