- From: lewis john mcgibbney <lewismc@apache.org>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 07:14:12 -0700
- To: public-prov-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAGaRif1_hcS6rVEqH+M52FkLWrFYwcrSNSrRCdt=yCB73NRXyg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Folks, We recently open sourced and transitioned the SWEET Ontology suite [0] from NASA JPL over to the ESIP Federation [1] and have renewed the interest in the resource from within ESIP and further afield. I'm currently spearheading an effort to bring SWEET up-to-date with a wide variety of advances in ontologies such as the excellent work undertaken by this WG on prov-o. Right now I am working on aligning SWEET with prov-o and would really appreciate input/peer review from this WG on alignment accuracy and extent. So far initial discussion can be seen at [2]. I propose to use the Alignment API software [3] developed by INRIA Rhône-Alpes, France to determine basic alignments. My choice of alignment software was determined by reviewing a larger list of ontology matching software [4] and making a judgement about software usability in order to determine instances of owl:equivalentClass. As you can see, very little work has been done. I am therefore looking to extend alignments in any way, shape or form which is accurate and factually correct. If you are able to provide input on wherever else I may be missing additional alignments, please comment at [2]. Thank you kindly in advance, Lewis [0] https://github.com/ESIPFed/sweet [1] http://esipfed.org [2] https://github.com/ESIPFed/sweet/pull/38 [3] http://alignapi.gforge.inria.fr/align.html [4] http://ontologymatching.org/projects.html -- http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/ @hectorMcSpector http://www.linkedin.com/in/lmcgibbney
Received on Thursday, 31 August 2017 14:14:38 UTC