Re: what is a valid PROV extension?

+1

> On 20 May 2015, at 12:14, Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> as I see it, as long as the PROV-Constraints are not contradicted by an extension, I would say it qualifies as "valid".
> 
> We have a wiki page that anyone can edit: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/PROV
> Maybe we could keep track of externsions there?
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> 2015-05-20 8:46 GMT+02:00 Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>:
>> Hi Paolo
>> 
>> It's an open web so anybody can do an extension and post it. What we have as official comes from the authority of the W3C process.
>> 
>> Paul
>> 
>> 
>> > On May 19, 2015, at 22:32, Paolo Missier <paolo.missier@newcastle.ac.uk> wrote:
>> >
>> > Greetings,
>> >
>> > simple and naive question: is there (or should there be) any validation or even “certification” process for PROV extensions? Can anyone who designs an extension claim to have done so correctly with impunity? In fact, should there be a repository of “official” extensions (if that has any meaning give the above)?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >  -Paolo
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-
>> > Dr. Paolo Missier   — Lecturer, Data and Information Management               Home: http://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/people/Paolo.Missier
>> > Paolo.Missier@newcastle.ac.uk, pmissier@acm.org                                         Twitter:https://twitter.com/PMissier
>> > School of Computing Science, Newcastle University,  UK                                   LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/paolo-missier
>> > =- Observe, Interpret, Understand, Act. Repeat -=                                              Visual stories: http://scattidistratti.smugmug.com/
>> >
>