W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-comments@w3.org > March 2013

[wbs] response to 'W3C PROV Vocabulary Usage Survey'

From: WBS Mailer on behalf of info@csarven.ca <webmaster@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 14:45:01 +0000
To: info@csarven.ca,zednis@rpi.edu,public-prov-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <wbs-36c6a32e76e21d204cb07580d8b15222@cgi.w3.org>
The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'W3C PROV
Vocabulary Usage Survey' (Provenance Working Group) for Sarven Capadisli.


---------------------------------
Vocabulary Usage Information
----
Please provide the name and url of the dataset, website or other set of
content that uses PROV  to describe provenance. We also encourage you to
fill out this form if your site uses an extension to PROV.
Name: ECB Linked DataURL: http://ecb.270a.info/Description: ECB (European
Central Bank) data published using the Linked Data design principles.


---------------------------------
Contact Information
----

Name: Sarven CapadisliEmail: info@csarven.ca

---------------------------------
PROV Encodings Supported
----
Choose all that apply

 * [x] PROV-O
 * [ ] PROV-N
 * [ ] PROV-XML
Please list any additional supported encodings (e.g. PROV-JSON, PROV-CSV,
etc.) in the free-text area below: 


---------------------------------
Feature Coverage
----
Indicate covered features by selecting one of the following below:
 * 1) I Don't Know
 * 2) Used 
 * 3) Will be used in the future 

 * Entity: [ 2 ++ ] 
 * Activity: [ 2 ++ ] 
 * Agent: [ 2 ++ ] 
 * Generation: [ 2 ++ ] 
 * Usage: [ 2 ++ ] 
 * Communication: [ 2 ++ ] 
 * Derivation: [ 2 ++ ] 
 * Attribution: [ 2 ++ ] 
 * Association: [ No opinion ] 
 * Delegation: [ 2 ++ ] 
 * Start: [ 2 ++ ] 
 * End: [ 2 ++ ] 
 * Invalidation: [ No opinion ] 
 * Revision: [ No opinion ] 
 * Quotation: [ No opinion ] 
 * PrimarySource: [ No opinion ] 
 * Person: [ No opinion ] 
 * Organization: [ No opinion ] 
 * SoftwareAgent: [ No opinion ] 
 * Plan: [ No opinion ] 
 * Influence: [ No opinion ] 
 * Bundle: [ No opinion ] 
 * Specialization: [ No opinion ] 
 * Alternate: [ No opinion ] 
 * Collection: [ No opinion ] 
 * EmptyCollection: [ No opinion ] 
 * Membership: [ No opinion ] 
 * Identifier: [ No opinion ] 
 * Attributes: [ No opinion ] 
 * Label: [ No opinion ] 
 * Location

: [ No opinion ] 
 * Role: [ No opinion ] 
 * Type: [ No opinion ] 
 * Value: [ No opinion ] 
Rationale: 


---------------------------------
Provenance Exchange
----
Is this vocabulary extension generated or consumed by an implementation,
which one(s)?
 

These answers were last modified on 8 March 2013 at 14:44:06 U.T.C.
by Sarven Capadisli

Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/46974/prov-vocabulary-usage-survey/ until
2013-03-30.

 Regards,

 The Automatic WBS Mailer
Received on Friday, 8 March 2013 14:45:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:50:06 UTC