- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:12:41 +0200
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- CC: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>, dgarijo@fi.upm.es, Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche <py.vandenbussche@gmail.com>, María Poveda <mpoveda@fi.upm.es>, "public-prov-comments@w3.org" <public-prov-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <51C02489.7000208@w3.org>
Timothy Lebo wrote: > Hi, Bernard, > > I'm cc'ing the prov comments list to archive your comments. > > @PROV-WG, I might need help refreshing on our provenance-of-provenance design to > fulfill Bernard's needs) > @Ivan, we have a 404 on http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-20120312 but it needs to be > there like http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-20130430 is) Is there a misspelling somewhere? There is a http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-20130312 (and not a 2012....) Ivan > @PROV-WG-chairs, are we still able to (or should we) use the tracker? > > I respond within... > > On Jun 17, 2013, at 9:32 AM, Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com > <mailto:bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>> wrote: > >> Hi Tim and Daniel >> >> I updated today the LOV record for PROV-O [1]. Actually this should have been >> done well before, but the new version(s) had not been captured by the LOV-Bot, >> due mainly to a confusing (for me and the LOV-Bot at least) namespaces and URI >> policy. >> I have several issues with this (important) vocabulary. > > Thanks for reporting your challenges with consuming the PROV namespace. If PROV > doesn't suit LOV, then it's a clear indicator that we aren't following common > practice. > I hope we can clear up the issues, either on your side or on ours. > I've started a section on the semweb wiki to document your questions and their > answers: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/PROV-FAQ#The_PROV_URIs > >> >> As I write in the vocabulary "review" : " Note that the namespace of the >> vocabulary is http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#, but its URI is >> http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o. But the RDF file declares >> <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> a owl:Ontology, which seems confusing at least." > > > yes, the namespace of the vocabulary is http://www.w3.org/ns/prov# > > http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o and http://www.w3.org/ns/prov are owl:Ontologies. > > From the comment itself, I'm not sure what is confusing. Could you elaborate? > (or, do the following three cover your concerns?) > > >> >> ... In more details : >> >> 1. The namespace http://www.w3.org/ns/prov# does not dereference to the >> ontology, but to a general documentation page about various documents using >> the namespace, including the ontology itself. > > Yes. > >> How am I supposed to GET the RDF description of e.g., >> http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Activity, from the namespace URI? > > In short, use content negotiation. > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/PROV-FAQ#GET.27ing_an_RDF_description_of_a_PROV_term > > curl -H "Accept: application/rdf+xml" -L http://www.w3.org/ns/prov > > > >> >> 2. In the RDF at http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o I read >> <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> a owl:Ontology >> one should expect <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o> a owl:Ontology seems to me … > > There are two instances of owl:Ontology, at lines: > > 30 <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> > 31 a owl:Ontology . > > 1237 <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o#> > 1238 a owl:Ontology ; > > Could you explain why you would expect http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o to be a > owl:Ontology? > > As it stands, http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o provides the resource representation > of the owl:Ontology http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o# <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o#-o> > > >> >> 3. The previous versions (Candidate Recommandation and Proposed >> Recommendation) are available as HTML documentation, but the respective RDF >> versions are not available. > > > > > >> The link to the OWL version redirects to the current version. > > Yes, to restate: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/PR-prov-o-20130312/ points > to http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o in "The OWL encoding of the PROV Ontology is > available here <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o>."? > > The RDF representations for those versions are sitting around, so if you could > describe in more detail how you'd like to be able to access them, perhaps we can > update the provenance-of-provenance to > suit your use case. > > From within http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o, the owl:versionIRI and > prov:wasDerivedFrom are intended to provide access to the previous versions. > But, I'm seeing a 404! :-) > > > <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o#> > a owl:Ontology ; > rdfs:comment """This document is published by the Provenance Working Group > (http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Main_Page). > > If you wish to make comments regarding this document, please send them to > public-prov-comments@w3.org <mailto:public-prov-comments@w3.org> (subscribe > public-prov-comments-request@w3.org > <mailto:public-prov-comments-request@w3.org>, archives > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-c > omments/). All feedback is welcome."""@en ; > rdfs:label "W3C PROVenance Interchange Ontology (PROV-O)"@en ; > rdfs:seeAlso <http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/>, <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov> ; > owl:versionIRI <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-20130430> ; > owl:versionInfo "Recommendation version 2013-04-30"@en ; > :specializationOf <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o> ; > :wasRevisionOf <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-20120312> . > > > Thanks again for your comments. I hope that we can iron out some of the wrinkles > that you ran into. > > Regards, > Tim Lebo > > > >> >> Thanks for any clarification. I understand that since we deal now with a W3C >> Recommandation, if anything needs to be fixed, the process is likely to be long :) >> >> Best regards >> >> >> [1] http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/details/vocabulary_prov-o.html >> >> >> *Bernard Vatant >> * >> Vocabularies & Data Engineering >> Tel : + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59 >> Skype : bernard.vatant >> Blog : the wheel and the hub <http://bvatant.blogspot.com/> >> Linked Open Vocabularies : lov.okfn.org <http://lov.okfn.org/> >> -------------------------------------------------------- >> *Mondeca** ** * >> 3 cité Nollez 75018 Paris, France >> www.mondeca.com <http://www.mondeca.com/> >> Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews <http://twitter.com/#%21/mondecanews> >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> Meet us during the European Open Data Week <http://opendataweek.org/> in >> Marseille (June 25-28) >> >> > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2013 09:13:13 UTC