- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 08:39:30 -0400
- To: Ray Fergerson <ray.fergerson@stanford.edu>
- Cc: Helena Deus <helenadeus@gmail.com>, "public-prov-comments@w3.org" <public-prov-comments@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <A99C4468-C046-4993-843A-94FF6F802324@rpi.edu>
Ray, (cc'ing the prov comments list to archive the issue issue/resolution for accessing the OWL representation) I don't see a `diff` between your new BioPortal copy and http://www.w3.org/ns/prov.owl, so it seems fine. A note on naming and ontology composition: PROV is actually a union of several ontologies, one of which is PROV-O. PROV-O is the subset that fulfills the Recommendation, while PROV also includes the terminology for all other PROV-WG documents, including the DC-TERMS mapping, Access and Query, mentionOf/bundling linking, etc. This is described in metadata and provenance in the OWL file as RDF and as comments. So, your catalog could choose to list both PROV and PROV-O, or pick one to list. After some discussion on the W3C list [1], LOV recently chose to list the aggregate for PROV and none of its component ontologies http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/details/vocabulary_prov.html Regards, Tim [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-comments/2013Jun/0010.html On Jul 23, 2013, at 5:52 PM, Ray Fergerson <ray.fergerson@stanford.edu> wrote: > Uploading the file directly seems to have produced something reasonable. Please have a look. It is quite possible that our download does not support content negotiation but it probably should. > > Moving Trish to BCC on this message. > > Ray > > From: Trish Whetzel [mailto:whetzel@stanford.edu] > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 2:14 PM > To: Timothy Lebo > Cc: Ray Fergerson; Helena Deus > Subject: Re: Provenence ontology in BioPortal > > Hi Tim, > > I was curating this, … Ray will be able to make updates to the metadata or assign admin privileges as requested. > > Trish > > > On Jul 23, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: > > > Ray, > > The Recommendation OWL can be found at http://www.w3.org/ns/prov > > As that page states, the OWL representation of the ontology can be obtained as Turtle or RDF/XML using content negotiation. > > If you can't use content negotiation, you can access the OWL directly using http://www.w3.org/ns/prov.owl > > > > @Trish, I'm cc'ing you b/c you've asked about PROV-O and you seem to have been curating the BioPortal entry. > I don't have access to edit BioPortal and am not planning to use it. Who can update this entry? > > > > @Helena, your name came up to, can you update the entry to something that BioPortal'ers find useful? > > > Thanks, > Tim > > > > > > On Jul 19, 2013, at 4:55 PM, Ray Fergerson <ray.fergerson@stanford.edu> wrote: > > > Tim, > > The file uploaded for this ontology is just an html page. It is not an OWL file. Can you upload a real ontology? Do you want us to delete it instead? > > http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/3131/?p=summary > > Below is a snippet from your uploaded file. > > Ray > > > <title>prov: ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl@600c6fd1fdb4</title> > <link rel="alternate" type="application/atom+xml" > href="/hg/prov/atom-log" title="Atom feed for prov"/> > <link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" > href="/hg/prov/rss-log" title="RSS feed for prov"/> > </head> > <body> > > <div class="page_header"> > <a href="http://mercurial.selenic.com/" title="Mercurial" style="float: right;">Mercurial</a> > <a href="http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/" >Home</a> / > <a href="/hg/prov/summary">prov</a> / file revision > </div> > > <div class="page_nav"> > <a href="/hg/prov/summary">summary</a> | > <a href="/hg/prov/shortlog">shortlog</a> | > <a href="/hg/prov/log">changelog</a> | > <a href="/hg/prov/graph">graph</a> | > <a href="/hg/prov/tags">tags</a> | > <a href="/hg/prov/branches">branches</a> | > <a href="/hg/prov/file/600c6fd1fdb4/ontology/">files</a> | > <a href="/hg/prov/rev/600c6fd1fdb4">changeset</a> | > file | >
Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2013 12:39:56 UTC