[wbs] response to 'W3C PROV Vocabulary Usage Survey'

The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'W3C PROV
Vocabulary Usage Survey' (Provenance Working Group) for Sarven Capadisli.


---------------------------------
Vocabulary Usage Information
----
Please provide the name and url of the dataset, website or other set of
content that uses PROV  to describe provenance. We also encourage you to
fill out this form if your site uses an extension to PROV.
Name: BFS Linked DataURL: http://bfs.270a.info/Description: BFS (Bundesamt
für Statistik - Swiss Federal Statistics Office) data published using
the Linked Data design principles.


---------------------------------
Contact Information
----

Name: Sarven CapadisliEmail: info@csarven.ca

---------------------------------
PROV Encodings Supported
----
Choose all that apply

 * [x] PROV-O
 * [ ] PROV-N
 * [ ] PROV-XML
Please list any additional supported encodings (e.g. PROV-JSON, PROV-CSV,
etc.) in the free-text area below: 


---------------------------------
Feature Coverage
----
Indicate covered features by selecting one of the following below:
 * 1) I Don't Know
 * 2) Used 
 * 3) Will be used in the future 

 * Entity: [ 2 ++ ] 
 * Activity: [ 2 ++ ] 
 * Agent: [ 2 ++ ] 
 * Generation: [ 2 ++ ] 
 * Usage: [ 2 ++ ] 
 * Communication: [ 2 ++ ] 
 * Derivation: [ 2 ++ ] 
 * Attribution: [ 2 ++ ] 
 * Association: [ No opinion ] 
 * Delegation: [ 2 ++ ] 
 * Start: [ 2 ++ ] 
 * End: [ 2 ++ ] 
 * Invalidation: [ No opinion ] 
 * Revision: [ No opinion ] 
 * Quotation: [ No opinion ] 
 * PrimarySource: [ No opinion ] 
 * Person: [ No opinion ] 
 * Organization: [ No opinion ] 
 * SoftwareAgent: [ No opinion ] 
 * Plan: [ No opinion ] 
 * Influence: [ No opinion ] 
 * Bundle: [ No opinion ] 
 * Specialization: [ No opinion ] 
 * Alternate: [ No opinion ] 
 * Collection: [ No opinion ] 
 * EmptyCollection: [ No opinion ] 
 * Membership: [ No opinion ] 
 * Identifier: [ No opinion ] 
 * Attributes: [ No opinion ] 
 * Label: [ No opinion ] 
 * Location

: [ No opinion ] 
 * Role: [ No opinion ] 
 * Type: [ No opinion ] 
 * Value: [ No opinion ] 
Rationale: 


---------------------------------
Provenance Exchange
----
Is this vocabulary extension generated or consumed by an implementation,
which one(s)?
 

These answers were last modified on 17 February 2013 at 17:41:31 U.T.C.
by Sarven Capadisli

Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/46974/prov-vocabulary-usage-survey/ until
2013-03-30.

 Regards,

 The Automatic WBS Mailer

Received on Sunday, 17 February 2013 17:42:04 UTC