Re: PROV response to comment on bundles and ids

Thanks Satra

We can definitely add a bit about nesting as an editorial clarification.

I'll take this email as the acknowledgment of the WG's response.

Thanks
Paul

On Oct 27, 2012, at 16:20, Satrajit Ghosh <satra@mit.edu> wrote:

> hi paul,
> 
>> So we don't allow the nesting of bundles to avoid complications about there interpretation.  Thus, in prov-n we introduced the notion of document as a container for all statements that are not part if a bundle.
> 
> thanks. that makes sense.
> 
>> We can add your example as something that is invalid. One needs to redeclare the namespace prefix.
> 
> i think in general it's useful to provide some invalidation pointers. even something like bundle of bundle should be pointed to as invalid. i just reread the bundles section in prov-dm it doesn't explicitly rule out nesting and in prov-constraints it's somewhat indirect. for container datatypes, it might a good thing to explicitly state nesting considerations.
> 
> cheers,
> 
> satra 
>