W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-comments@w3.org > October 2012

Re: PROV response to comment on bundles and ids

From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 16:46:24 +0200
Message-ID: <1B4B5383-5937-4936-BEFC-289FCFEC0FAE@vu.nl>
CC: "public-prov-comments@w3.org" <public-prov-comments@w3.org>
To: Satrajit Ghosh <satra@mit.edu>
Thanks Satra

We can definitely add a bit about nesting as an editorial clarification.

I'll take this email as the acknowledgment of the WG's response.


On Oct 27, 2012, at 16:20, Satrajit Ghosh <satra@mit.edu> wrote:

> hi paul,
>> So we don't allow the nesting of bundles to avoid complications about there interpretation.  Thus, in prov-n we introduced the notion of document as a container for all statements that are not part if a bundle.
> thanks. that makes sense.
>> We can add your example as something that is invalid. One needs to redeclare the namespace prefix.
> i think in general it's useful to provide some invalidation pointers. even something like bundle of bundle should be pointed to as invalid. i just reread the bundles section in prov-dm it doesn't explicitly rule out nesting and in prov-constraints it's somewhat indirect. for container datatypes, it might a good thing to explicitly state nesting considerations.
> cheers,
> satra 

Received on Saturday, 27 October 2012 14:47:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:50:04 UTC