Re: PROV-O editorial issue: hadOriginalSource

Dear Tom, the issue is addressed to my satisfaction.
Thank you,
Jacek


On 2 Nov 2012, at 09:58, Tom De Nies wrote:

> Hello Jacek,
> 
> The Working Group has corrected the issue you pointed out. You can find the details of our response here:
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-476_.28hadOriginalSource.29
> 
> For the W3C process, it would be nice to get an acknowledgement from you that this addresses your concern.
> Again, thanks for your response and your interest in PROV.
> 
> Best regards,
> Tom De Nies
> 
> 
> 
> 2012/8/9 Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be>
> Hello Jacek,
> 
> Thanks for your comment, and clearly, your attentive reading of the documents!
> 
> We've created ISSUE-476 for this
> https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/476
> 
> You are correct in noticing that hadOriginalSource has been changed, and more specifically, to primary source:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/#term-primary-source
> Judging from a quick search, I think the term only still occurs a few times in PROV-O, am I correct? (PROV-DM and PROV-N don't seem to mention it anymore)
> We'll handle your comment on our internal mailing list from here on, as not to swamp you with emails.
> You can always visit the issue URL above to check on our progress.
> Thanks again!
> 
> Best regards,
> Tom
> 
> 
> 2012/8/9 Jacek Kopecky <j.kopecky@open.ac.uk>
> Dear Prov WG,
> I spotted that in the LC drafts, hadOriginalSource seems to have been removed or renamed (could't quickly find a change log that would say which), but it still occurs in the document(s) here and there.
> 
> May all your issues in LC be editorial like this,
> Jacek Kopecky
> 
> --
> The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302).
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Friday, 2 November 2012 10:48:13 UTC