- From: Davide Ceolin <davide.ceolin@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 22:44:38 +0200
- To: public-prov-comments@w3.org
Hello, I am a PhD student of the VU University Amsterdam, and I would have a question about the composition of activities in PROV. I noticed that it is not possible to explicitly state that an activity is actually part of another one. Suppose that a given entity is the result of an activity and, in turn, this activity is part of a larger one. I can represent this scenario with two separate graphs stating that each of the two activities generated the entity, and from them (and their execution times, etc.) I may infer that one is part of the other one, but I can't explicitly state that. Is there a specific reason for such a limitation? Thanks, Davide Davide Ceolin MSc. PhD student The Network Institute VU University Amsterdam d.ceolin@vu.nl http://www.few.vu.nl/~dceolin/
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 21:28:06 UTC