- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 09:13:55 -0400
- To: Satrajit Ghosh <satra@mit.edu>
- Cc: public-prov-comments@w3.org
- Message-Id: <A7D2A468-3ACD-469E-8BCB-BE2DFD211559@rpi.edu>
Satra, Since the notion of conceptually grouping resources is popular is so many other models, it doesn't seem necessary to recreate it. I plan to use dcterms:hasPart / isPartOf to model sub activities. I've seen others use http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/ro.owl#part_of SKOS broader might apply, too. As far as your wasFollowedBy, prov:wasInformedBy is similar but I think a different meaning than you intend. Regards, Tim Lebo On Jul 6, 2012, at 8:45 AM, Satrajit Ghosh wrote: > hello, > > i was discussing this with luc and based on his feedback thought it might be useful to bring this up on the list. > > ---- > question: > how do you encode that a certain activity "emailing a letter" happened during another activity "a meeting"? > > for example we conduct research studies/projects. > > activity(p1, [prov:type='ex:Project']) > activity(p2, [prov:type='ex:MRIScanning', ex:session=1]) > activity(p3, [prov:type='ex:MRIScanning', ex:session=2]) > > how would i encode that this activity p2 and p3 were conducted during p1? > how would i encode p3 followed p2? > > > luc's response: > Regarding your question, there may be a few options: > you could add time information to your activities. This will help you understand their ordering. > > Alternatively, if you want an explicit dependency in your graph, then p2 may generate something > that starts p3, and/or is consumed by p3 > > Finally, prov doesn't have relations between activities, to express their nesting, etc. It's important > but we felt this is not specific to provenance, but to process executions. > ---- > > it's the last point on this response that i was not completely sure about. why "relations between activities" is "not specific to provenance, but to process executions." > > in the above example, one could say: > > wasSubtaskOf(p2, p1) > wasSubtaskOf(p3, p1) > wasFollowedBy(p2, p3) > > any clarification as to why such relations would be outside the realm of provenance would be much appreciated. > > cheers, > > satra
Received on Friday, 6 July 2012 13:14:25 UTC