- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 17:57:07 +0000
- To: public-propertygraphs@w3.org
On 31/01/14 17:35, Ashok Malhotra wrote: > > On 1/31/2014 12:06 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: >> The lack of a solid proposal as WG input with prior implementations of >> such features in use for real suggests to me that the timescale >> proposed is optimistic. > It is going to take W3C several months to get the WG going. > Should we start work on a proposal? "solid proposal as WG input *with prior implementations*" The implementations are evidence a proposal is at least approximately in the right area. Open to getting verification another way but it is necessary - is there another way? Andy > > Ashok > >
Received on Sunday, 2 February 2014 17:57:35 UTC