Re: Antwort: Draft IG Charter -- Your Comments, Please

I am also interested and would like to participate
ernesto
On Sep 22, 2007, at 4:21 PM, Robert H Shelton wrote:

> Good morning Thomas and all.   For some reason, I did not receive  
> your email post of August 5, but was pleased to read Sören’s post  
> and to see via its attachment and your original message that the IG  
> work is being commenced once again.  I’m quite interested in this  
> area, and similarly wish to renew my eagerness to participate in  
> the group.
>
>
>
> Warmest regards,
>
>
>
> Robert Shelton
>
> RShelton@PrivateAccess.info
>
> (949) 858-8384
>
>
>
> From: public-privacy06ws-request@w3.org [mailto:public-privacy06ws- 
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sören Preibusch
> Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 7:13 AM
> To: public-privacy06ws@w3.org
> Subject: Antwort: Draft IG Charter -- Your Comments, Please
>
>
>
> Dear Thomas and dear all,
>
> thanks for setting up the draft charter. I followed the discussions  
> so far and wish to renew my intention to join the Interest Group.
>
> I was delighted to see, that the related mailing list [public- 
> pling@w3.org] has been created last week.
>
> A point that needs to be clarified in my opinion is whether the IG  
> will discuss "any" policy languages or focus on "privacy, access  
> control, and obligation management areas", as specified in Section  
> 2. I would prefer a focus.
>
> I also suggest explicitly adding "privacy preferences" to the  
> Scope. They may be subsumed to "user-led requirements". >From the  
> user's perspective, privacy preferences are the starting point when  
> assessing a data handling procedure. Compliance needs to be assured  
> between a user's preferences and the actual data practices, or -  
> speaking in languages - for instance, between an XPref policy and a  
> P3P policy.
>
> Regarding the Mission, I suggest to add to the first paragraph:  
> "The Interest Groups aims at enabling an integrated policy-driven  
> workflow to guide actions and processes."
>
> Best regards, Sören.
>
>
>
> -----public-privacy06ws-request@w3.org schrieb: -----
>
> > An: public-privacy06ws@w3.org
> > Von: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
> > Gesendet von: public-privacy06ws-request@w3.org
> > Datum: 08.05.2007 23:02
> > Thema: Draft IG Charter -- Your Comments, Please
> >
> >
> > It's been a while since the privacy and policy languages workshop
> > last October.  We're now initiating the process to launch the
> > Interest Group that was discussed toward the end of the workshop.  A
> > draft charter is available online:
> >
> >  http://www.w3.org/Policy/2007/ig-charter
> >
> > We're looking for your informal feed-back and comments; simple
> > expressions of interest are also welcome and useful.
> >
> > As usual, an Interest Group is a forum that provides infrastructure
> > for building up a community.  An Interest Group *can* produce
> > deliverables in the form of Interest Group Notes or workshops, or
> > propose further work.  However, it cannot engage in Recommendation
> > Track Work by itself.
> >
> > From the draft charter's scope section:
> >
> >  The Policy Interest Group is designed as a forum to support
> >  researchers, developers, solution providers, and users of policy
> >  languages such as XACML (eXtensible Access Control Markup
> >  Language) and P3P (W3C's Platform for Privacy Preferences
> >  Project). It provides a forum to enable broader collaboration,
> >  through use of email discussion, scheduled IRC topic chats, Wikis,
> >  and Weblog tools.
> >
> >  The group will primarily focus on policy languages that are
> >  already specified and broadly address the privacy, access control,
> >  and obligation management areas; it is not expected to engage in
> >  the design of new policy or rule languages. It will work towards
> >  identifying obstacles to a joint deployment of such languages, and
> >  suggest requirements and technological enablers that may help
> >  overcome such obstacles.
> >
> >  The Interest Group hosts discussions both of architectural and
> >  application interest; it will, in particular, consider use cases
> >  in the privacy, access control, identity management and obligation
> >  management areas. The group may explore the use of relevant
> >  technologies toward delivering interoperability frameworks for
> >  policy languages. Relevant technologies include Semantic Web
> >  technologies and the work of the W3C Rule Interchange Working
> >  Group.
> >
> > Please direct comments, input, and expressions of interest to the
> > workshop follow-up list at <public-privacy06ws@w3.org>.
> >
> > Regards,
> > --
> > Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
>
>