[strategy] Issue: [wg/json-ld] JSON-LD Working Group Charter (#494) marked as Horizontal review requested

pchampin has just labeled an issue for https://github.com/w3c/strategy as "Horizontal review requested":

== [wg/json-ld] JSON-LD Working Group Charter ==
New charter proposal, reviewers please take note.

# Charter Review

[Charter](https://w3c.github.io/json-ld-charter-2025/)

[diff from charter template](https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https://w3c.github.io/charter-drafts/charter-template.html&doc2=https://w3c.github.io/json-ld-charter-2025/)

Expected end of charter refinement phase: [November 2025](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2025JulSep/0027.html)

If applicable:

[diff from previous charter](https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https://www.w3.org/2023/01/json-ld-wg-charter.html&doc2=https://w3c.github.io/json-ld-charter-2025/)

[chair dashboard](https://www.w3.org/PM/Groups/chairboard.html?gid=wg/json-ld)

What kind of charter is this? Check the relevant box / remove irrelevant branches. 

* Existing 
 - [x] Existing WG recharter 

Horizontal Reviews: apply the Github label "Horizontal review requested" to request reviews for accessibility (a11y), internationalization (i18n), privacy, security, and TAG. **Also add a "card" for this issue to the [Strategy Funnel](https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/97/views/2).**

## Communities suggested for outreach

?

## Known or potential areas of concern

* JSON vs JSON-LD fracture in the data space
* ?

Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised? (this strategy funnel issue, a different github repo, email, ...)

[w3c/json-ld-charter-2025 issues](https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-charter-2025/issues)

## Anything else we should think about as we review? 

cc @BigBlueHat

See https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues/494


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 10 September 2025 16:17:50 UTC