Re: privacywg call for consensus: GPC first public working draft

Thanks all; we have consensus both at the last meeting and on the list.
(Participants shouldn't feel an additional obligation to re-iterate
support on the mailing list in addition to a meeting when the chairs
have assessed consensus at a meeting, but it's also fine to do so.)

Philippe and Tara, please go ahead with FPWD publication and setting
up auto-publication for GPC.

We also have agreement to plan to publish an explainer as a Draft
Note, but that doesn't seem urgent at the moment for the initial
publication.

Cheers,
Nick

On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 1:58 PM Nick Doty <ndoty@cdt.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Privacy folks,
>
> This is a call for consensus, to confirm on the list the proposed
> resolution that we had at last week's Privacy Working Group meeting,
> that the Privacy Working Group should publish a First Public Working
> Draft of the GPC (Global Privacy Control) specification.
>
> We had consensus at the meeting, but also wish to confirm on
> the list, for the following proposed decisions:
>
> proposed: publish a FPWD based on the gpc-spec repo
> proposed: auto-publish new Working Drafts based on merged updates
> proposed: plan to publish explainer as a non-normative Draft Note, and
> set auto-publish as well
>
> Meeting minutes:
> https://github.com/w3c/privacywg/blob/main/minutes/privacywg-20241107.md
>
> As was emphasized on the call, publishing a First Public Working Draft
> of the GPC spec does not communicate Working Group consensus on all
> the contents, but instead indicates that the Working Group is working
> on this document and that we are asking for review as we work on it.
> To follow the requirements of the Process, we also have to document
> the open issues, which are currently tracked in the GitHub issue
> tracker; that also doesn't preclude opening additional issues.
>
> If you have an objection to these decisions, please let us know on
> list by next Monday, November 18th.
>
> This would also include these follow up actions that we would ask the
> W3C Team to take. Thanks Philippe and Tara!
>
> ask team to move repo to privacywg, and set up redirects
> ask team to enable Echidna and auto-publication
> ask team to notify / start wider review
>
> Other reminders:
> If you or your organization haven't yet joined the Privacy Working
> Group, please do so by following the instructions here:
> https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/privacy/instructions/
>
> Because of the change in charter and type of the group, participants
> in PING (Privacy Interest Group) need to re-join and approve the
> commitments of participation.
>
> We plan to meet again on Thursday, November 21st. There will be a
> separate thread on questions of meeting scheduling.
>
>
> Thanks for your participation and work on privacy. I anticipate in the
> coming year that this will become an even more important area of work
> and we will benefit from the W3C community's efforts.
>
> -- Nick, for the co-chairs
>
> --
> Nick Doty | https://npdoty.name
> Senior Technologist
> Center for Democracy & Technology | https://cdt.org

Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2024 19:23:15 UTC