[strategy] Issue: [ig/exploration] Exploration Group (#451) marked as Horizontal review requested

plehegar has just labeled an issue for https://github.com/w3c/strategy as "Horizontal review requested":

== [ig/exploration] Exploration Group ==
# Evaluation

A core part of our *Strategic* work is the evaluation of how proposed work serves the Web. In the "Evaluation" phase at the end of the funnel, we make the case whether work is ready to proceed to Chartering of a Recommendation-track deliverable. At that point, we need to identify:

* Will this work help to lead the web to its full potential?

https://w3c.github.io/charter-drafts/2024/ig-exploration.html

See also https://github.com/w3c/AB-memberonly/issues/207

* Is the work Rec-track ready?
  Not Rec-track
  
* Do we have the ecosystem of participants needed to make the work successful?

 unclear

  * users, developers, implementers; industry sectors
  * from that we can dig into
    * who specifically is involved? interested, opposed?
    * what tools and frameworks do they use?

Will it add value?
* something good for web users. what are the alternatives?

 continue as-is, with insufficient communication around the strategy work.

* have "horizontal" (a11y, i18n, security, privacy) issues been considered and identified?

 N/A

Will we be able to make it succeed?

unclear

* right participants interested. What does the ecosystem look like?

Special considerations?
* risk factors
* incentives
* openness, decentralization


## Procedural

Next step is the breakout at the upcoming AC meeting

See https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues/451


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 17 July 2024 17:05:22 UTC