- From: Shawn Lawton Henry via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2023 20:37:25 +0000
- To: public-privacy@w3.org
shawna-slh has just labeled an issue for https://github.com/w3c/strategy as "Horizontal review requested": == EOWG re-charter == New charter proposal, reviewers please take note. # Charter Review [Charter: EOWG](https://w3c.github.io/charter-drafts/2023/eowg-charter-2023.html) What kind of charter is this?: - [x] Existing WG recharter - If this is a charter extension or revision, [diff from previous charter](https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FEO%2Fcharter2020&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fcharter-drafts%2F2023%2Feowg-charter-2023.html), and any issue discussion: none yet 🤞 Horizontal Reviews: apply the Github label "Horizontal review requested" to request reviews for accessibility (a11y), internationalization (i18n), privacy, and security. * [ ] SLH TO DO **Also add a "card" for this issue to the [Strategy Funnel](https://github.com/w3c/strategy/projects/2).** Communities suggested for outreach: ... Known or potential areas of concern: In 2017 re-chartering, there was a push for making EO and IG instead of a WG. For 2020 re-chartering we headed that off by talking to folks beforehand and providing this info [about WG vs IG](https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/EOWG_Charter_2020_Additional_Information#Analysis_of_Working_Group.2C_Interest_Group.2C_Community_Group) Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised? (this strategy funnel issue, a different github repo, email, ...): hummm * this strategy funnel issue is fine or, for different visibility: * team-side: wai@w3.org * group chairs: group-eo-chairs@w3.org Anything else we should think about as we review? _(I might add things later if they come to me)_ See https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues/428 -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 7 September 2023 20:37:28 UTC