W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-privacy@w3.org > January to March 2021

Re: css custom highlight

From: Matthew Finkel <sysrqb@torproject.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 18:55:33 +0000
To: Nick Doty <npdoty@ischool.berkeley.edu>
Cc: Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org>, "public-privacy (W3C mailing list)" <public-privacy@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20210121185533.sjjfqdqzhe5js4vg@localhost>
Hi Nick,

No, we didn't have time on today's call to discuss it, but I also didn't
have any new concerns of the draft (and that surprised me, too). It's a
relatively small enhancement on existing CSS functionality, so I think
any risks related to the proposed changes really lie in the original
pseudo-elements spec.

- Matt

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 01:33:00PM -0500, Nick Doty wrote:
> Hi Matt,
> 
> I don't think we got to in the PING call today, but I was curious about the
> CSS Custom Highlight review. I took a quick look at the spec this week and
> was surprised to find that I couldn't find any privacy issues with it at
> all. Did you notice any concerns?
> 
> Often I take an author's suggestion that there are no privacy or security
> considerations with a new feature as a challenge that there probably are
> some, but maybe this is a case where there actually aren't.
> 
> Thanks for your careful reviews and presentation of these CSS specs.
> Cheers,
> Nick
> 
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 6:08 PM Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org>
> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > 3. CSS Color Adjustment Module Level 1
> >
> > Spec: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-color-adjust-1/
> >
> > 4. Custom Highlight API Module Level 1
> >
> > Spec: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-highlight-api-1/
> >
Received on Monday, 25 January 2021 13:37:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 25 January 2021 13:37:14 UTC