- From: Matthew Finkel <sysrqb@torproject.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 18:55:33 +0000
- To: Nick Doty <npdoty@ischool.berkeley.edu>
- Cc: Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org>, "public-privacy (W3C mailing list)" <public-privacy@w3.org>
Hi Nick, No, we didn't have time on today's call to discuss it, but I also didn't have any new concerns of the draft (and that surprised me, too). It's a relatively small enhancement on existing CSS functionality, so I think any risks related to the proposed changes really lie in the original pseudo-elements spec. - Matt On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 01:33:00PM -0500, Nick Doty wrote: > Hi Matt, > > I don't think we got to in the PING call today, but I was curious about the > CSS Custom Highlight review. I took a quick look at the spec this week and > was surprised to find that I couldn't find any privacy issues with it at > all. Did you notice any concerns? > > Often I take an author's suggestion that there are no privacy or security > considerations with a new feature as a challenge that there probably are > some, but maybe this is a case where there actually aren't. > > Thanks for your careful reviews and presentation of these CSS specs. > Cheers, > Nick > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 6:08 PM Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > 3. CSS Color Adjustment Module Level 1 > > > > Spec: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-color-adjust-1/ > > > > 4. Custom Highlight API Module Level 1 > > > > Spec: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-highlight-api-1/ > >
Received on Monday, 25 January 2021 13:37:06 UTC