Re: Privacy Review - Decentralized Identifier Specification v1.0

Great, thanks!

On Wed, Jan 6, 2021, 18:23 Pete Snyder <psnyder@brave.com> wrote:

> Hi Brent,
>
> Yes, we have a reviewer looking at the spec now, and will be sharing their
> findings at the next PING meeting (Jan 21).  They’ll either file any issues
> that come up before hand or immediately after (deepening on the reviewers
> findings, confidence and PING discussion).
>
> Hope that helps!
> Pete
>
> > On Jan 6, 2021, at 9:39 AM, Brent Zundel <brent.zundel@evernym.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Just following up on this. Do you know if a reviewer has been assigned?
> >
> > We are hoping to transition to CR in early February and would like as
> much time as possible to get PING feedback incorporated into our spec.
> >
> > Grateful for your work and for PING's efforts to support privacy on the
> web, and looking forward to seeing feedback.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Brent
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020, 08:38 Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org>
> wrote:
> > Thank you Brent.
> >
> > We have a PING call today, so I have added this request to the agenda.
> >
> > Thank you also for the offer to join a DID WG weekly teleconference. We
> will keep this in mind.
> >
> > Christine
> >
> > > On Dec 16, 2020, at 11:29 AM, Brent Zundel <brent.zundel@evernym.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Greetings PING,
> > >
> > > The DID WG is requesting horizontal review of the Decentralized
> Identifier Specification v1.0
> > >
> > > We have also completed the Security and Privacy Questionnaire
> > >
> > > We look forward to receiving feedback from you and invite you to open
> issues in our Github repository for that feedback.
> > >
> > > We also welcome PING members to join one of the DID WG weekly
> teleconferences. Please contact the DID WG chairs if you would like to
> arrange this.
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > >
> > > Brent Zundel, co-Chair DID WG
> >
>
>